cause they are in mandatory grind and people will equip them.
Propose what I said to the devs? You mean like I and countless others have done for months?
Right, and they will receive a notification on which maps they will go to when having them equipped.
wasnt the first wave of marines equipped with old equipment such as springfields and vickers (sorry its a water cooled browning)
I thought garand went to army first which Is why marines started that way.
like i said if they are optional weapons in t5 i wouldnt have problem with it.
but not with them being in t2 and t3 in mandatory grind.
Except you have zero topic made about custom battle.
I’m not opposed to this solution
However, if the devs decide to go this way, I still think they should be Berlin only, since it’s not like the devs made actually any care regarding balance, since it doesn’t take in account squad composition or level.
yes coast guard and marines had springfields. i was talking more about europe/africa part.
1 Like
Within the last few months no, whenever the news was fresh yea.
Show link because I cant find it in your profile.
Ask if robihr will make a coloring book for you about the subject I really am not going to explain this in 60 pages again.
Probably que times.
Its actually a combination of many things, getting bigger playerpool = shorter que times
BR to balance things and various other things.
Actually you decided to nitpick with numbers earlier in this exact thread.
And you are minority so what is the problem here ?
And wrong again. You are trying to make the game fun for ~10 of you.
And imagine how surprised iam that you still havent delivered them ?
Oh boy…
And still none delivered 
About your statement earlier how topics of this ha subject gets closed.
Or something else.
I asked how many there is since you are speaking ( Depending of day ) of gigantic group, significant group, large group
But so far ive seen just ~10 ? Of you making these exact same topics / arguments.
And let me assure you iam surprised that you still havent provided.
What I could possibly bring to your suggestion that is shit ? Which you have brought up numerous times and for some odd reason you seem to believe that your suggestion becomes better or even doable if you keep spamming it ?
Ah yes, theres alot of us perhaps we are even majority but I still fail to provide any evidence.
Also, devs are after me.
Intresting could have sworn you mentioned something about devs deleting / damage controlling or what ever “im the victim” stuff you mentioned earlier.
Yeah im sure thats why theres gigantic group of you in this “trendy party bus” of yours.
Well according to you it is ? Since you apparently remembered the exact number I exeggerated in other topic.
I don’t believe it’s the topic title, but I’m am 100% positive it was a point in one of my threads.
It could also be in the one thread that I know the mods set to hidden due to people arguing in the comments like this.
ah . I guess I thought it made sense as Pacific is the “starter” campaign for USA, so springfield is a good choice.
What about this too. Have cross-time-period guns like the ppsh, avs36 and the ppd’s be moved to tier 3 that way they can see all soviets maps, however they will be set behind a great amount of mandatory unlocks to get to them.
Great. Not even the title but I definitly may have mentioned it once in the last weeks months years.
What even would be the changes in a realistic mode? It seems that absolutely no one can agree on the changes that mode would have
2 Likes
this is exactly the problem. everyone has his own version on how historical accuracy/immersion should be implemented in the game.
My interpretation of the original idea was more about less hud, no penetration indicaters or aim help, no sticky 3d spotting, maybe increased scale and movement, weapon modifiers.
Not really anything to do with the discussion thats been happening about BR placement and HA.
I could be wrong
Simply put, immersive environments.
Some weapons and vehicles have been added (before the merge was even an idea) that were a result to try and balance the weapon from an opposing side (MkB 42 vs Federov) when they could have been left out of said campaign (Federov not included in the game unless you guys release Finnish faction and Winter War), because they are not entirely accurate to the setting.
Ultimately, this merge could help fix these problems due to having a focus on the power rating of the weapon/vehicle, so with accurate weapons, it’s not a complete one-sided battle and the gear is more evenly matched (like seeing PPsH with a drum on Moscow, despite it having a higher BR)
TL;DR: With the new system of matchmaking that the merge is presenting, this mode would add additional parameters that lock certain weapons out of certain maps. It will most likely have a longer queue time due to the different checks the search has to go for to get a populated match, but as a lot of us expressed, we were willing to wait a few more minutes for a game that is more enjoyable to our interests.
Yeah I’d be down for that idea. And where we can still have bud and aim assist. Just have it be a mode in itself but not a hardcore mode