jeez i was just making a suggestion for a tiger thats barely improved for an event vehicle, dunno why this is so controversial lol
3 Likes
I wouldn’t mind. As long as it comes with a very nice looking “skin” for once.
But for an event vehicle… what I’d like the most is:
Tiny pz1 tankette, ohohoh. I have a lot of fun with Soviets T60 tankette, I’d like that thing for axis.
Quite diametrically opposed to KT in TT I know 
but I love those funny tiny things, more than powerful monsters.
4 Likes
But…Why?..
i dont think the tech tree needs another tiger and i would really prefer something like this not be a $49.99 premium
1 Like
I don’t know, to me it just looks like a tiny pirate flag on the tiniest tank of axis arsenal 
I’d really just want a simple pz1. Infantry support is fun. Yes I know, it would be completely worthless against ALL other tanks in game, but I’d still drive it!
3 Likes
I’d rather leave the questions unanswered, because you won’t like them)
I’ve killed TIger II on perfect side of turret with T-34 STZ.
With those tracks this is impossible.
“Jumbo’s extra armor wouldn’t block anything frontally as you can pen it’s MG port on the hull”
Surely tracks aren’t big deal but this argument is pure 
No
70% of the time with I fight Tiger II it wasn’t facing me directly.
- He’s aiming elsewhere, you better pray for the RNG shell normalization happens well on your first shot.
- Any veteran knows there’s snail magic on spinning thing, you should always swing your turret .
1 Like
How is that even relevant? BR3 won’t be facing BR5 any longer.
3 Likes
Literally is not - if you played it in Wt you’d appraciate tthat extra 50 hp
Ah yes - more non-existent vehicles - just what Enlisted needs.
and indeed a superior form of non existence since COULD NEVER HAVE EXISTED in the form it is in WT (which is what wold be used) - the gun doesn’t fit into the turret!
KV-1(zis-5) have 96 / 82 / 22 (APHE) pen on BRIV
Tiger II turret have 80mm base armor facing slightly up
I have already told you in the most detailed way, even so, do you still have to continue pretending to be confused? Some axis players are really shameless, they will never bring any help to balance.
Didn’t you see the screenshot I just took? Rotating the turrets is sufficient to allow Tiger 2 to resist IS-2 (1944), but without these tracks, the side would have been pierced.
The special turret shape of Tiger 2 makes it almost afraid to rotate the turret, and these tracks will alleviate this problem, it’s that simple.
HMM you sure , you know the 8,8 cm didnt fit inside the panther but the idea was to just turn the gun upside down while 8,8 panther isnt the ideal example of this , the ideal example would be Firefly which fitted a 17pdr by flipping it , also 10.5 cm was meant for lowe which had more or less same turret space that mean 10.5 cm could have been used in Tiger II
Concept for 10.5cm Tiger from Krupp
same thing for 88mm panther though you were forced to reload the gun in specific way
and here how it was meant to be reloaded
1 Like
You shouldn’t expect a BR3 tank to destroy BR5 tanks every time. With such crappy cannon your only real choice would to be flanking and shooting at the hull. How about you play with BR5 tanks like T-34-100 that make Tigers explode one after another.
Don’t be stupid tracks are just 30mm of additional armor which is nothing while Jumbo has double of it’s armor when compared to the M4 Sherman, there is a reason why it’s a BR4 tank not BR3 like Sherman 75mm.
If it’s not facing you then it will be easy prey as it’s entire side will be exposed and even if you ricochet you will be able to destroy him in the next shot. He will most likely not able to be see you on most maps unless someone is marking you. First shot advantage is massive in Enlisted so use it for your advantage and don’t invent some imaginary scenarios as always you are Soviet mains. Nobody is swinging their turrets as it’s not a WT and will only destroy your breach or still 1hk your ass anyway due wonky shell physics.
Good you shouldn’t be using that crappy obsolete tanks anyway. Use panzerfust and destroy KT in a 1-2 hits.
You’d better not use Tiger 2 anymore, you hypocritical guy.
Yeah i will be spawning my Leopard A7+ and shoot your T-14 Armata. Oh wait it’s a WW2 game.
There are any number of threads on the WT forum giving great detail about how the 105 could not fit inside the Tiger turret in the way WT does it.
Certainly there WAS a project to make a 105 Tiger - but it involved a modifications to the turret or maybe an entirely different one - we don’t really know because it was never built - it never got beyond paper - not even wood mock ups were made.
the concept (which as all it ever was) apparently included a stabiliser and auto-loader - clearly NOT the model that is in WT, and never likely to be.
The Panther is an entirely different proposition, and your diagram for how it could be loaded is also here - with more discussion - Panzerkampfwagen Panther With 8.8 cm Gun Design Proposals - Tank Encyclopedia
But again only a concept - possibly a wooden mock-up was made, but the web page states that if it did then it disappeared by June 1945.