Is the front turret armor different from the original? For example, more armor or more angle?
1 Like
3 Likes
Facing the enemy: It will definitely be penetrated.
Facing the enemy from a certain angle: may be penetrated.
The part without tracks: must have been punctured.
The part with tracks: may be punctured.
Rotating the turret after shooting can increase your survival rate.It is best to turn the turret to the left so that the barrel can block more area, and the right side of the turret can be penetrated smaller.You are facing IS-2 (1944) here, and if it were IS-2, you would be completely indestructible. Do you actually want me to teach you how to use Tiger 2?
I wouldn’t mind using it as an activity vehicle. Activity vehicles could be better, but it’s shameful for you guys to demand something by ignoring your weapon advantages.
3 Likes
Don’t both IS-2s use the same gun?
The cannon is the same, but the penetration of the shells is different, and the penetration of the IS-2 is even worse.
1 Like
If true that is a very odd balancing decision by the developers.
Because they are two types of shells.
1 Like
Yea I know, I’m saying it’s quite odd that the devs decided to give the two IS-2s different AP shells.
Added track armor wouldn’t block anything frontally as you can pen it’s armor by attacking at the bottom of first track armor as you just showcased.
Are you saying that sla 16 Tiger would always expose it’s upgraded side turret armor to block enemy shells? It’s just ridiculous it would never happen in a real match.
Tankers will be always facing your tank and never angle it’s turrets this ain’t War Thunder.
jeez i was just making a suggestion for a tiger thats barely improved for an event vehicle, dunno why this is so controversial lol
3 Likes
I wouldn’t mind. As long as it comes with a very nice looking “skin” for once.
But for an event vehicle… what I’d like the most is:
Tiny pz1 tankette, ohohoh. I have a lot of fun with Soviets T60 tankette, I’d like that thing for axis.
Quite diametrically opposed to KT in TT I know 
but I love those funny tiny things, more than powerful monsters.
4 Likes
But…Why?..
i dont think the tech tree needs another tiger and i would really prefer something like this not be a $49.99 premium
1 Like
I don’t know, to me it just looks like a tiny pirate flag on the tiniest tank of axis arsenal 
I’d really just want a simple pz1. Infantry support is fun. Yes I know, it would be completely worthless against ALL other tanks in game, but I’d still drive it!
3 Likes
I’d rather leave the questions unanswered, because you won’t like them)
I’ve killed TIger II on perfect side of turret with T-34 STZ.
With those tracks this is impossible.
“Jumbo’s extra armor wouldn’t block anything frontally as you can pen it’s MG port on the hull”
Surely tracks aren’t big deal but this argument is pure 
No
70% of the time with I fight Tiger II it wasn’t facing me directly.
- He’s aiming elsewhere, you better pray for the RNG shell normalization happens well on your first shot.
- Any veteran knows there’s snail magic on spinning thing, you should always swing your turret .
1 Like
How is that even relevant? BR3 won’t be facing BR5 any longer.
3 Likes
Literally is not - if you played it in Wt you’d appraciate tthat extra 50 hp
Ah yes - more non-existent vehicles - just what Enlisted needs.
and indeed a superior form of non existence since COULD NEVER HAVE EXISTED in the form it is in WT (which is what wold be used) - the gun doesn’t fit into the turret!
