There are some excellent low-ranked players, and sometimes Stg44 pewpew kids are useless.
1 Like
one thing i dont understand about this game,
how can you have 39 kills and 15 deaths IN 39 MINUTES ???
1 Like
Wow nearly 400 kills.
2 Likes
I have seen you at several matches. I thought I had seen your name somewhere, but now the mystery is solved. You were always in the top tier.
1 Like
At least they ran toward their goal, which helps.
Thank you. I play a lot on the Allied side in Normandy, so we may have been in the same match a few times.
1 Like
Once the update drop, probably US and commowealth playerbase become stable, and finally allies player on normandy map stop being a legend who only few have seeyed
1 Like
Especialy if you will not be 24/7 against Tigers, Stg’s and other friendly things.
1 Like
only 11k xp for carrying game single-handedly… xp system really needs rework also…
397 kills, 20 deaths and ~37 minutes.
considering high number of assists and 21 vehicle kills i would assume p47 with probably jumbo/sherman 76. and cause of high death counts and highest capture points count, he was also rushing the cap.
More likely he farmed four airstrikes.
nah… maybe 1 or 2, but game seems very vehicle heavy.
Got Gaijined there with the booster curse with conquest + shit team.
"Because the US troops in Normandy had inadequate weapons compared to the German army. Of course, the weapons of the US troops were good, but this is relative. We need to understand why high-ranked players are on the German side. The reason is that weapons such as the STG44, 75-round MG, and FG are far superior to the US weapons. If the US troops had at least good infantry equipment, there would be no reason for the Axis to win easily like they are now. axis in normandy is like Allies in moscow
Of course, you can win, but you have to do everything yourself. In the process,players get angry and tired, and they may even lose interest in the game and the developers wouldn’t even bother to make changes (sometimes even being lazy). And now, what has become of it? With their thoughtless balance sense and incomprehensible updates, they have driven away their own users.
Then they offered a massive overhaul that gives hope . I’m looking forward to it. I hope that the game where one side is unilaterally slaughtered will be fixed. I just hope that they make wise decisions.
2 Likes
If you read the dev and update blogs, you might be happy. Your issue should stop being an issue then.
Playerbase shifts campaigns more than you change your daily socks. Can’t predict or even say that X or Y side is unbalanced. It’s all about what the good players want to grind for the day.
1 Like
From my experience the past couple nights, Axis is just as bad or WORSE! Teammates not setting up any rallies, all shifting to the sides of the objective and very few on it. My buddies and I are the ONLY ones keeping the team afloat. We always take top 3 or even 4. Even my buddy that sits back with a sniper and spotting for us has more kills than majority of the others. I take the time to set up fortifications one objective back and still have 2-3 times as many kills and objective interactions as the #4 on the team.
I’ve been around for a while but hadn’t played since they released the player rank stuff. I’m just a corporal 
That theoretically solves lower-tier balance, but what are high-tier US troops supposed to use? They have nothing but the 1919 and M2 which still isn’t pleasant to use with the sights.
I’m sure this isn’t what a lot of people want to hear, but the Allies have a pretty solid second sniper rifle. In many situations its been because of these that we get pushed back as Axis. The snipers can provide extremely useful support against infantry that are a threat before they even reach the front line. This helps open the door for 1919 and M2. The only thing is that it generally requires teamwork to be fully effective strategy.