And you are giving example that only some specific faction encounter?
Late war Germany now can play on Moscow and Stalingrad.
late war Soviet also.
If we have have late war Italy stuff in the future they can join Tunisia.
late war US and British may join Pacific if Japan receive late war vehicle in future.
This is the solution, late game player definitely have early war weapons, HA weapons on specific maps gives even more diversity in terms of weapon and combat style.
No, Moscow will be all the maps from battle of moscow
It’s not confusing at all
will be just a winter map to be played on.
i have 0 issues with the above pic. for me, its just a map with snow.
Why? All weapon * All map should be greater than Some weapon * some map.
Dunno man…
I dont know what you think about Japanese and Italian stuff but if you think it will be competitive against Jumbos, Pershing and whatnot, the result wont be entertaining.
Heck, sure. Japanese stuff is so wunderbar that almost all of their current tanks get rekt by a driving pair of M2HBs…
1 Like
I fixed it for you.
1 Like
There will be br so why is meta weapon * all map?
Other faction can play more map and you said it have little difference because some faction can’t . There is definitely an increase lol.
Chi Nu? Chi To?
Because people naturally will gravitate to meta.
Br only causes people to use br meta before reaching the ultimate meta. Because why would anyone voluntarily give up on an advantage?
Then how is your ha method didn’t have this problem?
I like this “I don’t care about HA” 15min later “gtfo with your HA” rethoric that seem to be present in those discusions.
I wonder when we will see one here.
2 Likes
- people go for br meta, then for ultimate meta
- people go for br meta, then for meta in this campaign
Instead of one meta for all, you have meta for each campaign.
Lol no, if we have a united tech tree people will go for ultimate meta according to you. It means that all people will be in Berlin in that case.
Exactly not. Rethink it.
meta in this campaign may be normal weapon in other campaign. So they will still look for ultimate meta.
I mean for late player, early weapon * early war map + late weapon * late war map, gives more different combat style compared to only late weapon * all maps.
I agree this is more diversity, however as there is always a balance between different demands. If the developers have the ability to achieve this level of diversity, and there is enough players to fill it, then why do not give different options of game mode like War Thunder.
No because for each campaign you have different loadout.
So you have loadout for campaign X with it’s meta etc.
Meta from one place may not even exist in other (that has it’s own meta).
Imagine what we have now but with nation tech tree, no transfer cost and with queueing for many campaigns.
1 Like
Ehm yes because at the end, only Soviets and Germans really have more maps and iirc we have more factions beyond them.
Cant pen Jumbo.
soon.
2 Likes