The Game is DYING

[Shiivex]

Oh just too add,

You don’t need xp on that historical setting on mod maker, coz everything will be avaiable to spawn with.

[Aurora_Pioneer_I]

You try to show that historical mods are easy to make, and that no one plays them shows that they are not popular. However, after all, you haven’t made such a mod, and you haven’t refuted the idea that mod has no EXP, which leads to unpopularity. Now you’re trying to denigrate my personality. Interesting huh

@Shiivex

you trying too hard to make a point that isn’t true.

Prove which point is incorrect
Although DEA and I often disagree, we can have a friendly discussion (technically and theoretically). But I can only see irony here, so there is no need to continue talking to you. If I say something wrong, you’d better refute me directly instead of beating around the bush. But an excuse and complain is more easy, isn’t it…

@Shiivex

You don’t need xp

It’s hard to say that some people really don’t care about EXP. Most people don’t waste their time on unprofitable games, except for those “fools” like us who waste their time making mod

[Shiivex]

Again, you and your friends that want historical batles won’t need xp, COz thst xp will lead to get stuff on normal campaign that isn’t historical.

Or, you guys just. Want to play a historical batle with historical gear?

If so. U guys don’t need xp.

.

[robihr]

@GiltBurrito7238

Every weapon in game is historical.

it is not historical if weapons were used months or years before their actual deployment. ffs just look mkb 42 and moscow. earliest account of their service is 50 prototypes in april 1942 in leningrad, but even that is questionable considering field tests were being done in july 1942. and battle of moscow ended in january 1942. and game is getting more and more historically inaccurate with weapons and vehicles that werent used in particular campaigns being regular unlocks in them.

[Aurora_Pioneer_I]

@Shiivex

Again, you and your friends that want historical batles won’t need xp

Of course, if we can get all weapons and vehicles for free, XP is unnecessary. The problem is that there are not many people playing mod with us (because they care about EXP), so we have to play normal XP games. This is a logical paradox of yours

[Devenddar]

@Night_Voyager_CN

Caused bugs. I tried to combine the Soviet Union and Japan, but failed completely and could not run

Well… I meant by this way emitate it all:

Custom Profiles Guide

There have been a lot of questions about custom squads, profiles recently, and i thought I would make a post about what i know, and explain how they work to my best knowledge. First of all custom profiles currently don’t work to their fullest. (Event profiles do) Only profiles for bots work online. *Player profiles works ONLY IN LOCAL MODE. (Probably to prevent access to late game content by devs to new players) As a start i will load the squad profile that was used for the Sea Predator eve…

But yeah… You cant make playable Japan/USSR for players… But still can emitate it with weapons.

@Night_Voyager_CN

My map of Berlin uses existing scenes as much as possible. However it is very stuck due to too many entities. So I’m afraid to make too big a map now, while small maps are basically not historical (generally speaking, large-scale battles in history), and I can’t make special forces missions because of AI and other mechanisms

Well… I think I should recheck your map.
But I remember that you heavly edited it. Many destroyed tanks. Many new objects and some weird terraforming moments. I mean do it minimum so you will able use original NavMesh and unlimited big map range.
I dunno. Enlisted maps are cool. Just need some changes. Not so much like you did.

Hmmm… I maybe should finish my map (Day-D or Arena) to sure talk about it…
But yeah. Currently time I changed only beach area and added airfields, but they’re in gray zones (only for aircraft battle zones). So don’t have problems with NavMesh.

[gastanofrizzi]

@Night_Voyager_CN

You try to show that historical mods are easy to make

They are, as @Devenddar said, the editor even if is a shit currently it let you fix some maps and reuse them for make some historical battle, @tommyZZM showed that with hard work large historical costum map can be made

So yes they can be made with a decent effort

@Night_Voyager_CN

and that no one plays them shows that they are not popular.

Because people want pew,pew and so the most played costum map are the pew,pew one, or you gonna want prove that there is a swarm of player asking for make a new HLL in enlisted?

@Night_Voyager_CN

the idea that mod has no EXP, which leads to unpopularity

@Devenddar

You already can do historical maps with only historical weapons.
(We already can full customize bots and 50% players (weapons)).
And these maps don’t require any progression.

@Devenddar already answerd

[Aurora_Pioneer_I]

@Devenddar

heavly edited it

I’m sorry, this is my style, keep improving until it is extremely fine. So it bothers me,
Anyway, thank you for your help, but I do have a bottleneck in mod, and I haven’t found any perfect solutions

[Aurora_Pioneer_I]

@gastanofrizzi

@9331497 showed that with hard work large historical costum map can be made

He often complains that he cannot use custom templates. He did not make a new historical map, but made innovations in playing methods (unfortunately, limited by functions). Please do not confuse concepts

@gastanofrizzi

Because people want pew,pew and so the most played costum map are the pew,pew one

So why don’t players choose BF or COD? Historical accuracy, vehicles (and stupid AI?) are Gaijin’s only advantages. When they abandon them, Enlisted has come to the end

@gastanofrizzi

@79498559 already answerd

I don’t think you understand the use of the editor. What DEA said is just some reluctant solutions, which I am not satisfied with

[gastanofrizzi]

@Night_Voyager_CN

He often complains that he cannot use custom templates. He did not make a new map, but made innovations in playing methods

What I sayed hard work, he do whatever he can do and achievied a good results

You cant make new map or costum campaign but you can fix the existent one and make them more historically

@Night_Voyager_CN

So why don’t players choose BF or COD?

Because they buy them every year, enlisted is more a safe solution for long terms if you want only pew,pew

@Night_Voyager_CN

What DEA said is just some reluctant solutions, which I am not satisfied with

Your problem not our, take a plane for riga and go complain undr darkflow main studio, because the editor is shit

[gastanofrizzi]

D-DAY beach part need more bunker to capture, is stupid German and US, figth for a single bunker

[Shiivex]

That’s true… would be cool to fight for a front…

[Aurora_Pioneer_I]

@gastanofrizzi

What I sayed hard work, he do whatever he can do and achievied a good results

Our ideas are different, and has he really succeeded? Pewpewpew players are the overwhelming majority, and TOMMY’s work is not really popular with many people (some people just like it because of curiosity, how many people really play it?). He and I agree that the game needs to be greatly improved

@gastanofrizzi

more a safe solution for long terms

I’m worried about whether this game can survive

[gastanofrizzi]

German soldier: officer US infantry captured that bunker in front of the beach
German officer: we lost the Normandy fall back to paris

[Ratta_01]

that’s another big problem imho

[mergenthewise]

I just want good bipod nothing more at this points

[Shiivex]

One day… One day

[mergenthewise]

Metallica - The Day That Never Comes

[robihr]

anyways my problem with the game that every campaign is starting to look like copy paste of another one. just end game whoring with invulnerable tanks (vs early campaign counterparts) and automatic weapons.

game needs unified technology tree, campaign historical weapons and functional equipment based MM. also they need to focus more on bug fixes/QOL improvement and not on adding new content.

[Aurora_Pioneer_I]

Let’s observe the future of this game… I’m not optimistic about this. I hope I’m wrong