Yeah, you are not of those “everything except BAs is unbearably spammed so I can’t enjoy this game properly” guys.
1 Like
I still play the game everyday just fine wino issue or complaint about balance, so whh is this br crap even getting added
Yeah I wouldn’t mind if there was only like 3 br levels. Early war/mid war/late war. I don’t care about balance, I would love to see variety.
I really don’t know why majority of suggestions here on forum has to balance weapons according to powerlevel, it’s just boring for me. Plus they divide it into at least 6 BR levels.
I love asymmetrical balance. But it’s harder to implement it right, that’s true. Plus there’ll be always crying of certain individuals about how unfair it is.
2 Likes
Imo this BR rating won’t help to ballance anything. Vets will still stomp noobs both in terms of skill and equipment.
It will only promote homogenous loadouts and will make ppl who suggested this feel better because “it’s ballanced”.
1 Like
the players BR rating should be the average medium of the players top 4 strongest squads + the average medium of BR of all the vehicles they have
perks should not have any BR BUT that being said any perk that can have significant impact on the game (more HP or increased move speed) should not exist
each red attribute point = maximum limit of physical strength.
Each yellow attribute point = weapon recoil restraint
Each green attribute point = soldier’s base movement speed
Based on players feedback from q&a topic, devs are thinking about some ideas about equipment and granades.
5 Likes
If i can say my opinion For me give equipment and granade a BR in base their effectines is better solution, there is no need to restrict or other alternative if we can ensure the who decide bring a granade pouch with 3 phosphorus granade figth only aganaist people who have the ability for do the same (same BR)
Example:
- If WP granade is BR 3 people with them can join only in BR 3 and superior BR battle not in BR 2/1 battle
When the developers first missed the BR system in Enlisted, players pointed out this flaw.
This response came 2 to 3 months after players raised this flaw before announcing the start of a new folder on it.
And because the QA for the third dev report is too similar to the QA after the first two dev reports, players have become pessimistic about the efficiency and speed of the development progress.
It is doubtful that the content of the 2023 development roadmap will be completed sufficiently within the year.
The events of War Thunder in particular show that developers and decision makers will not choose to listen to player suggestions unless there is a fierce player boycott (even if these suggestions last for several years).
2 Likes
Then perhaps you will be very happy to know that, according to known information, veteran players can have multiple regiments with the same function, while new players have only a few. For example, veteran players can have 8 Spitfire regiments at the same time through 10 slots, even if they don’t carry Spitfires, they will have 2*8 infantry with 147.3% (35% + 12.3%) life (Spitfires without Spitfires) among them
I guess by “spitfifire” you mean flametrooper / flamethrower.
Quite funny mistake of a translator.
Enlisted low BR gameplay footage :
3 Likes