Oh and ghost shells don’t forget that i literally can’t penetrate the side armor of a t26 with my pz3b it was at a very close distance the crosshiar turn bright green and i can’t even kill anyone of its crew its bs
Usually the first shot kills your gunner/loader, and while you change seats and try to find the turret pixel again/drive away, another crew member is dead again.
You wish. Beloe Lake grey zone T-50 hold, Monastery 1st objective grey zone hold behind the house, Quarry hilltop grey zone hold are all meta.
Get good yourself at logic if you think Moscow tanks are perfectly balanced.
Theres a stuka for that
Absolutely… well no when it comes to facing a T50. but most of the soviet tank are penetrable if you’re still at a pz2 or 3. killed a t28 with a pz3b yesterday
Working as intended.
IL-2 also kills tanks fine. Doesn’t mean it’s balanced.
See:
That’s exactly the point. It has a couple pixels where it can be hurt and it is available for $8 with the first tanker squad.
Not all of the matches in moscow will you counter a T50. f2p are stubborn fuckers they aren’t going to spend a dime on a $8 tank just so they can get better at the game
i like ti do a thing in this case, of the t50 shoot and hit First i Just exit the vehicle wait until the T50 get bored shooting the turret of the pzIV.
repait the tank and do like a Surprise Attack, its pretty good and It saved me a lot of times.
Doesnt really change the balance issue.
reverse trolling 2.0, Before the F1? PZ IV could pen the same weakspot nexto turret but it rarely did anything else than killed the turret crew.
Thus with the remaining crew T-50’s just head on crashed to PZ IV as rest of crew was save behind stalinium armor.
Got to try this reverse trolling 2.0 next.
The T-50 gets trolled by the Premium PzIV with the HEAT round.
That P2W thing basically rules Moscow. Its still a PzIVE so it can be relatively easily killed by the T-50 or T-28’s but if it sees them first they’re dead. The T-50 though with its reduced crew tends to be an OHK.
There is no need to nerf the T-50. Give Germany a tank to face it. How about Marder? A high-penetrating tank destroyer would be able to effectively contain the T-50.
Honestly STUG in Moscow when?
Play the Stug in Stalingrad. Its hard yards… The rounds will still bounce off “angled plates” and you will be mostly grey zone camping with it to avoid the detpack spam.
At least in Stalingrad GZ camping is significantly reduced because of LOS restrictions and the availability of alternative avenues of approach that are often off the street.
Most streets are also sufficiently cluttered to obscure the Stug’s ability to intervene with its HE, as it will explode on contact with poor hitboxes well short of the intended target.
You do realize right that, unlike Stalingrad, the Moscow campaign has more open spaces and almost no ruins
its quite sad that only thing that can effectively counter it on that distance is stuka … i know the bullshit around angles and etc. but… isnt the tank obviously too durable ?
Sure, but I think I have confused you with the Stalingrad reference to GreyZone camping - when I re-read what I wrote, I realised it in hindsight.
The key take away is that you will have to pick your spot and chances are it will be as far away as possible in the grey zone, because as soon as you’re in range of detpack its gg.
Danuvia M39 can’t beat PPSH at close range… ?
Nah, not really
9 months later: T-50 is still absurd.
Let alone T-34.
It’s impossible to fight against the camo T-50 in Pz III/IV, the advantage T-50 has in both cannon armor is simply insane.