Suggestion for balance of vehicles in battle

but i have a solution to you. ~

why dont you ask for a “no vehicle option” / only tier 1 vehicles "on custom matches? and make everyone happy?

Not gonna lie i can relate to this.

Having spent 70€ on the game i kind of feel tied to it, an obligation to NOT quit

1 Like

buyers remorse?

1 Like

:joy: :joy: :joy: :joy: :joy: :joy:

You say that limit vehicles such as panther to 1 and then allowing players to spawn in another goes against game design, that thing with the reserves did too and people payed for it too, so it’s already been done, they should allow players to use another vehicle squad once the panther for example has been destroyed without using another slot for another armored vehicle. Now if you say they wouldn;t do it cause greed sure, but the game design is a none arguement they have broken it already

Agreed

Basic but would work.

(Product placement!) Possible solution.

1 Like

he got the data.

trust him

1 Like

Am i understanding your suggestion correctly?

You need to earn more points or something to spawn a better tank?

Id say thats pretty good, meaning you first must play infantry and achieve some good results in order to spawn a good tank.

Its like WT in Ground realistic battles, where you cant spawn a plane immeadeately, you must earn it by performing good

What’s wrong with you? I never said no vehicles. I said it would be better have some sort of spawnpoint system like one we already make in War thunder. Stop doing strawman argument.

Yeah probably :sweat_smile:

Not too easy letting go of something you bought for so much money. Kind of regret spanding so much, could have just gotten a 1 year premium membership, but i opted to buy them for a month packages each month.

Finally someone who properly understand what i mean. Thanks god

1 Like

where did i say that?

calm down sir. was a add on as suggestion over yours.

“no vehicle option” / only tier 1 vehicles "

only tier 1 vehicles, (as example coz i donno how vehicles are classified beyond what we find powerfull or not)

i did understand what you were asking, the no vehicles was a add on for someone that want inf vs inf only.

Same happened to me with WT but i finally ditched i don;t want to ditch Enlisted too nore get in a cock and ball torture relation with it, so changes have to be made and this is an FPS so there’s really not any monopoly nore a playercoun thtta can maint the game.

A lot of those issues will be resulted/mitigated by a basic matchmaker imo. Pretty sure devs had said they working on one. More restrictive and drastic measure shouldnt be on table since they can make the game unpleasant. At least we should wait to see the MM and see how it works. Just my opinion

2 Likes

exacly what i stated on my first answer.

ence why i m against it coz i didnt enjoy a single restrictive spawn system in hng.

1 Like

It’s a combined arms game, yes. Though that doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be a cap. HLL has a cap, doesn’t it? No one complains about that. If anything, the tanks should be classified and should have limited uses based on the classification of the tank.

the problem here, is what OP is suggesting.
its somehow like what HnG had, and no one , not a single player enjoyed it.

and what you see in HLL

in HLL tanks are limited to X models per batle. and tank A can fight against tank B. here is a grind game where i couldnt or will be limited to spawn a better tank coz someone relly on a worst one

i see a good tank against my team, i want to deploy something that can destroy it, if i dont have something to fight against it. ITS PURELY MATCHMAKER ISSUE to put a player against that gear.

if i grinded a toy, for countless hours, i want to use it.

Do you even play Enlisted? Do you think a matchmaker is somehtign somphisticated that requires months of developement? This is a Battlefield 2042 scoreboard tier issue, the problem is that there’s no players to add matchmaking cause it would cut the playerbase in half, and it’s already split in 8 different sides in 4 different campaigns, a matchmaker would turn that into 16 and with new campaigns coming the playerbase would be split even more, and we already have issue with playercount cause simply the game has a horrible playercount rn.

My thought is quite reverse. I like more when it is restrictive. I like when i have to constantly think strategically in between the restriction to maximize things. And i find it more authentic so that’s why. Idk i might be just a weird masochist but that’s what i think.

1 Like

No i am here randomly dont even know what Enlisted :neutral_face: