Lol
Yes in the end it was starting to be so hilarius watching ākill feedā how many friendlyes those two where killing. 
1 Like
Well I donāt blame them, they were 2 players killing an ocean of brainless bots on their team
Lol, so funny.
Either they can just remove friendly fire (WP spammers, flamethrowers morons that like to attack allies, etc) or harshly punish the stupid players that choose to do this.
They choose not to do anythingā¦ First because āif they do remove it the spamming will be unbearableā and secondly because there are no so many players doing this.
Jeezā¦
2 Likes
Really bad idea, your friendlies running in flame just because lol no TK!
And punishing is hard to do right to, what if you throw WP, and some troll player just kills himself so you get punished for something you didnt even wanted to do.
What do you want to do, suggest some good system that does nut punnish innocent players that didnāt wanted to kill allies.
1 Like
sometimes people do intencionally,others people do accidentally, me I admit I accidentally killed people of our team,sometimes because I am going to throw a grenade and they kill the guy who was going to throw it,others when I throw a molotov or a phospore grenade to a certain point and the people get in,I try warn people, but sometimes itās impossible
1 Like
If there will be a spawn score mechanism, you can deduct their spawn score as a penalty
At the same time you can avoid spamming white phosphorous grenades, grenades can also be used as a item counts for spawn scores if done properly
2 Likes
your friendlies in the middle of an allied bombing because lol no TK!
your friendlies staying in front of an allied tank because lol no TK!
your friendlies staying by an allied grenade because lol no TK!
your friendlies in the middle of an arty strike because lol no TK!
your friendlies not getting shot by you because lol no TK!
Do yo see the flaws in your logic? And donāt tell me itās a different thing because itās not, itās friendly fire/damage. And Iām telling you this because of the direction that Enlisted is headed to, especially now, where Enlisted will be inaccurate in some things and wonāt have a good realistic historical base thereās no point at all to maintain this mechanic.
And about the punishment, Iāve never said to immediatly punish team killers that killed 3-4 guys by accident. What I meant it was to pusnish those who kil a larger number or if they usually have this behavior in different matches, even with the help of other players, if they receive a lot of reportsā¦ Well, punishment for your account or you gameplay.
3 Likes
Did i say its a good thing? No.
Then suggest some real workable punishment tool for this, because i donāt have some real idea how to do this fair.
1 Like
Theyāre just trying to encourage you to get out of your hole and get on the point.
What you propose would just create a meta where one player spams WP on objective while his team caps it because no friendly fire.
1 Like
had too 
just too funny
BS. Almost every game there is WP spam.
My number one suggestion is remove WP until it is actually fair to use. Hitting through walls is ubearably OP.
4 Likes
This would be good idea, attleast for my opinion. 
2 Likes
You sir/madam deserve my +1 here.
1 Like
I understand, but if you play a 5 matches you gonna see 4 where the enemy and allied team are spamming WP, so, given the fact that now you can spam allied arty, spam bombings and some other stuff ('cause you aināt receiving any damage from all this) why not remove this friendly damage as well. We have spam anyways soā¦ I dunno, itās just what I see.
Bro, I was giving the argument that most of the morons who defend the friendly WP damage are repeating.
And itās funny, 'cause out of 5 matches you gonna see 4 where they spam WP grenades
Yep, according to some answer I read a few days ago: avoiding gas particles to pass through walls and other materials itās an expensive mechanic, so thatās why we have this ābugā or problem.
This might not sound good to certain groups of people but Iāll just say it here at least.
Maybe they could place grenade limit of 2 or 1 for WP for Squads just to keep players from spamming with it every so often and causing teamkills, It could force them in a way to tryout other throwableās than just WP only so that thereās some form of variety for peopleās playstyle with squads than just WP spamming.
It might not sound perfect or worst case alot of people will complain but they could also use the upcoming matchmaking system to kinda force people with WP grenade / Rare Weapon gear to be put in semi-historical battleās just to face off with other people who equipped there entire squads with rare weapons and other things explained from the matchmake update.
And for normal grenadeās / weapon gear seen or used during WWII, Maybe those people could be placed in actual Historical Battleās against other similar equipped players than the oneās equipped with alot of rare weapons / WP Grenades (Basically entire squads packing the gold weapons & WP Grenades)
But I do admit on using it alot usually on Pacific with all the squads being fully equipped for it to deny points or just make it annoying for enemy teams during hard pushes but I also can see how its annoying for team if not used carefully when teams are nearby defending or pushing.
In-case this is a little confusing, Basically:
Alot of Squads fully equipped with WP Grenades or Full On Rare Weapons for entire squads are just grouped into other players with similar builds to prevent them from being used against the more historical players that might use less of the rare weapon or WP.
(Unsure if historically there was an entire unit like in-game say example like 12 people all with WP grenades in real life)
And by Semi-Historical I just mean player wise that are equipped and such.