yeah the more the better that’s why I picked 80 MM Navy AT rocket Launcher since it has poor pen and we don’t need it in the TT. (there was variant Type 97 automatic cannon or 20mm Type 99 Cannon as options for events).
I hate to be the guy (or maybe not), but that first picture was Iwo Jima, not Okinawa.
Yeah I know but I needed something very iconic the Iwo Jima picture is simply more iconic.
yes please
I simply didn’t figure out a name for the event since the Japanese divisions didn’t fight in Okinawa and the US did so I was going to call it something like pacific anti -tank event but when I think of a good name I will change the tittle.
But they did. Ferociously! Until the last man, or there abouts.
And I’m not sure, but I don’t think we have any Okinawa (or Iwo Jima) maps in the game. Which is a travesty, in my eyes. Don’t quote me on that though, because at this moment, I’m not completely sure.
No I mean the Shanghai landing force the Japanese event squad
Sadly I wish we had Iwo Jima or Okinawa very iconic battles. Personally I prefer Iwo Jima because of mount Suribachi.
Ohhh… Gotcha!
That’s why I called it Battle of Okinawa but it needs to have some original name since the divisions didn’t fight in the same battles but when I figure out some interesting name I will put it. Something like Navy Infantry anti tank event but I must think more on the name xD
If we believe what is written on the Internet, then this is the only Japanese rocket launcher that was actually used in combat.
Therefore, it MUST be in the game.
The penetration is absolutely bad but the weapon looks very very unique compered to other rocket launchers.
Penetration is documented as 80mm. However, due to some mistake, the actual guns had a penetration of 57mm. Sad.
Well for BR II is ok if they give it something like 60 mm will be fine.
It can be assumed that in this defective batch there were some missiles with correct penetration:):):)))
hahha yeah they can give it maximum potential value.
And this weapon will be more authentic than 80 percent of the Japanese branch.
80 is also OK on paper its possible if it had no problem with the rockets.
I read somewhere that the Japanese used captured bazookas . . .
well yes they did many nations used captured anti tank weapons.
The weapons seem really nice and a proper land US-Japan event would be nice