If the Soviets get small little monster we get this Kettenrad
5 Likes
Here here.
Soviets and Japanese (also Italians) deserve (event) APCs.
Also M3 Scout Car, there were about 3 000 of them supplied under lend lease.
And while Voroshilovets might look massive
It’s actually not that far in size from SdKfz 7
2 Likes
It should be a Rider II vehicle IMHO, it’s as much a APC (as in “not at all”) as the Universal Carrier.
Should still definetly be added, and common enough to be in the tech tree too (though I’d want the Kubelwagen with MG 42 in the tech tree first, would not argue against both though).
2 Likes
And thanks to how small it is like the universal carrier you can get into a lot of screwed up areas.
I was wondering if you were too concerned about the Axis assault rifle with a scope in TT?
Also cold war
6 Likes
Recent events have been very bad for the Soviet Union and Japan. This situation must change.
They could easily give us a guerrilla event squad with the PPSH S, but I don’t know why they don’t.
1 Like
The fact that you’re asking for this just shows how incompetent you are and the fact that the developers were even thinking about this.
So let’s just stop and take a moment to think because do we want hordes of people running around with suppressed weapons at BR5 and if that is So what does that turn the game into if not a PVE when it’s supposed to be a PvP against bots because with one side running around with suppressed weapons it kind of looks like a PvE game.
And if you somehow find a way to reply to this and say it should still be added then realise you’re advocating for a PvE game and saying screw you to the Germans and the Japanese players 'cause we have to exist in your screwed up little world if that’s what you want while we have dumbed down weapons and you have weapons that function.
Because you can already do it with your gold weapon orders or give it to the paratroopers and then you have a suppressor division falling from the sky
Yep and the Soviets make up for that problem with Damage for their weapons or body armor So what.
1 Like
What do you mean? Is a event squad with a weapon we already have in files a big ask?
Event guns dont count smartass
With gold weapons ending up in the box for some whales they could essentially have an entire army outfitted with suppressed weapons.
1 Like
I think it’s because they don’t know what to give to Japan for a Br 5/4 smg or assult rifle
1 Like
The Mkb feels wrong being in the tech tree in its sniper configuration, only the STG 44 was ever used in any extent with a scope (not to a large one, of course).
However, to answer the question in full, if we have the the scopes available on other weapons, ones that could be (and especially, was) mounted on other weapons then I believe the game should offer us that option. Think of it as the company commander redestributing the supplies to other areas of the company, I feel like this makes sense, even if combinations were never actually used to any large extent. It is my choice, as the commander of my company, to deploy my soldiers in a way that I deem fit.
For example, I believe we should get 50-round versions of Commonwealth SMGs, the large capacity Lanchester magazines were compatible with the Sten gun family, as well as the Patchett SMG (future tach tree weapon, I hope), and even though I know of no use of them outside the Lanchesters it would still be fun to have a BR IV Patchett smg with a 50-round magazine as a event or BP weapon.
1 Like
It is when you consider the balancing issues of it or the fact that the developers had no faith in the Soviets to begin with So they did everything in their power to bend the scales for them.
Recent events have rarely had two squads. They’ve all been single squads. So I don’t think that’s a concern.
2 Likes
There’s no logic in what you’re saying. If they care so much about the Soviet Union, where’s my PPSH S? They’d rather give me a useless motorcycle with speed bug.
They will with PPD-Bramit, they don’t need to add anything new.