No, the BR of the Pershing is much higher.
The Jumbo with the long cannon also has a BR of 6.3.
Axies would have every right to demand KT Porsche in return.
i said nothing about perishing the m 36 tank destroyer was based off m10 and sherman
1 Like
Panther can core the Pershing through the UFP while the 90mm struggles to do the same right back
Pershing should also be 5.7 considering its just a US Tiger 1, but Gaijin loves to shaft US tank BRs
2 Likes
yes thank you
1 Like
The M36 tank destroyer used an M10A1 chassis (the M36B1 used an M4A3 Sherman chassis, while the M36B2 used an M10 chassis) mounting a large, open-topped turret mounting a 90 mm gun M3. The gunner aimed the gun using the M76F telescope. The 90 mm gun M3 was the standardized version of the experimental T7, a derivative of the 90 mm gun developed as a vehicle-mounted antitank weapon. The M36 carried 47 rounds of main gun ammunition, 11 of which were stowed in the hollow counterweight, while 36 rounds were stowed in the sponsons. For combat use, the 90mm gun M3 could fire five types of ammunition:
Of course the Powercreep race can always be continued to abrams, but 5.7 is a good BR to stop. There are plenty of tanks on it that wouldn’t be too huge and crazy for campaigns.
oh did you mean M36 GMC. Then why not, it or the M18 could be, but I objectively think the m4a3 76(w) is better
nah i want a 90mm gun
but lol if u really want perishing i would also take that but maybe as event vehicle or something
Why not, although I personally would prefer the sherman. The m36 fits the BR, it seems fine
Why not both?
M4A3 76 in place of Jumbo
M36 in place of M10
1 Like
I’m a fan of unique there’s a lot of Sherman’s already so show some love for the other ones
1 Like
the jumbo in game dont need replaced just add the 76 mm cannon it had and were in business
Imagine the crying if the Jumbo had M62 APCBC dude
I don’t think the forums could take it
I don’t see the point in replacing anything right now. We will have 1 more tank I think and it could be one of those two.
I will refrain from thinking about replacing because while the Axis asked to swap the Jumbo for a Sherman in the summer, the Allies were against it, but now they want it too.
I don’t like fighting against the jumbo, it annoys me, but I think the community chose to keep the jumbo in the game by resisting the suggestions.
I note that it would be incorrect to give two 5.7 BR and 5.3 tanks to the Allies when the Axis gets a 4.3 Pz4 H at jumbo level.
It seems to me the BR of the late tanks should be about equal
Play Berlin for Panthers.
6.3 BR, no
Berlin is terribly annoying with trash on the streets. Besides, that’s where I play the USSR.
It’s stupid to put a panther on a small street
Jumbo was in the same BR range as the PzIV H for most of its life until they uptiered the fuck out of the entire US tank tree this year btw
With a working weak spot like WT the Jumbo would be fine
1 Like
i know that’s right they crying wouldn’t stop
1 Like
Jumbo was awfully strong at 4.7 and was never at 4.3.
Even now, when he is at the top of the list, he is unkillable for most opponents.