Solution to BR 5 Jet payload Balance šŸ›©ļø

The surface of you and other players inability to cope with stressful environments that they willingly choose to put theirselves in.

Thats… just how it is.

Constant complaining of auto spam in low tier to rifleman cycle in high tier is bluntly pathetic… that is the charm of BRV and if you don’t like it dont play it and is that a ignorant stance to have? Yes.

I enjoy it how it is and i know others do too… this only serves to cater to people that instead of improvising adapting and overcoming choose to whine to the game developers about ways that can dampen their frustration.

Because what… you don’t like the explosions that jets make? Get over it dude.

bollocks it does. it doesnt stop you from using Jets AT ALL…in fact it affects you as a player on the individual level NOT at all. you cant be in two places at once.

1 Like

Yes… it does, p-47-meteor has been an essential part since it was added and proves well… i would have to choose between two very powerful aircraft when instead i could run both… and i have no problem with the latter as im in the big boy leagues now.

you have to chose now…you cant fly both at the same time.

Other borderline griefing teammates could be wasting the slot… which happens quite frequent now with people using the fighter with something as pitiful as a p-51 in high tier instead of meteor.

I can spawn one and then die then spawn in the other and also not have to have another squad die before i can get the plane again… this would fuck up so many peoples line ups which is me rationalizing it doing it to my own.

TU2, SU9

P-47, Meteor (and or P80)

Jabo, JU188

Kikka, Ki83

Which you apparently have such a problem with.

not likely…if you spawn in the fighter slot first, someone else is likely to occupy the Attacker slot…so when you die its locked…in fact, from your point of view, this would help you as an individual cycles attackers evern easier…because YOU are locking the slot…so when you die the chance you get it again is far higher

on the individual levels…its actually better for you if cycling is all you care to do

2 Likes

Often… but i mostly play in bot filled lobbies which require almost zero skill that doesn’t have enemy-teammates competing to steal my next vehicle cycle… but i can pull it off in public games and also do trade offs with my squad mates.

You have me pegged for the wrong person… i simply enjoy using vehicles when i like… they are a tool not playstyle.

I have gone on sometimes and just play as us to aircraft cycle… no doubt.

Not pegging you, just trying to understand any possible reason this would affect you on the individual level. this change is targeted on the team level. And if you are playing mainly bots, that hardly matters

2 Likes

To be clear, Im not saying fighters should have no ordnance…they require enough to deal with tanks (with some competency)…just not on the level of attackers…they should not be the ā€œgo toā€ like the IAR 81 C and P-40 have been since merge

2 Likes

I edited to list my plane lineups which have the high level attackers and jets… it works well and i have no problem with it regardless of the BR honestly im just not the type to care.

I enjoy the ones i have and would not like them changed… say there is bozo in the attacker well then i cant spawn in any of my planes because all of them are attackers now.

Changing a core feature like this i think is too much just to really lessen the amount of explosions which i will go back to again and say the argument drops off when you enter high br

We can agree to disagree i suppose i just personally think since it’s high br all bets are off the table and let shit hit the fan… haha

1 Like

perhaps if we get BR ±0, it will acheive both camps needs. (it would)

1 Like

Just last thing, (cos I saw you added it and I missed the first time) I just want to add that this is a key example of why I think its better.

Ki 83 is such a good plane. Japan has really good fighters, but…they can only have ONE in the air at a time. Its such a disadvantage for the team. (and on the individual level it hurst a little awell because you will be 2 vs 1 all the time)

and you did say add a high BR japanese attacker but honestly…they dont have one that could rival the current implementation of the kikka…not one that existed anywhere other than on paper as far as I know.

If the Kikka was an Attacker and the Ki-83 or the N1K2 was in the air at the same time…Japan would be hugely formidable as a team at top BR in the air


Im not a plane hater by the way…quite the opposite :slight_smile: I fly everything…and I want it all to have its day…not just meta aircraft

2 Likes

A large price to pay but does make sense yes

1 Like

The Japanese faction requires attack and bomber aircraft of levels 3 and 5.
Two types of Japanese airborne attack and bomber aircraft.

Is covering multiple issues with the same suggestion unfair…?

One would rather think that would make a suggestion/fix better, if it covers multiple concerns, and objectively better than another which only covers one…

If it wasn’t obvious i don’t think being able to use jet combined with top tier attacker is a problem… i also don’t like taking an L For 3 factions just for japan to get their respective slot filled.

Quite significant portition also hates it, since the jets are more than frequent subject of topics.

This isnt exactly one of those games where one could expect people to put such a effort.

Making things go boom is one thing, making thing go boom better than dedicated attacker plane is the issue.