Who on earth ever asked to have German Panzer division emblems on Soviet tanks, fighting for the Soviet side?
What’s next, all weapons open for all factions? All factions FFA 4v4?
Who on earth ever asked to have German Panzer division emblems on Soviet tanks, fighting for the Soviet side?
What’s next, all weapons open for all factions? All factions FFA 4v4?
Strange way to interpret the demand here, but not technically wrong if you look at it in a twisted way I suppose.
I can commend the foresight here, matches are short as is, so its no loss to those who play as groups as is.
I mean… you could just make roadmaps with more attainable/realistic goals no? Regardless, more of these and more devblogs wont go amiss.
Looks suspiciously non-Manchurian, but I do like the vibe going on in the image at least.
Blessed be finally, I just really really really hope these arent paywalled for no good reason, if they need to be purchased, at least let it be done so through silver, or even better let us earn them through achievements like in War Thunder.
Its worded weirdly which worries me, but in theory thats a good thing, atm I’m thinking something a bit like the contract system in tf2, which is a bit long winded but I digress.
This depends, do you mean, any faction can use any roundel? Or do you mean British tanks could use the “US tank star” (Called the allied star for a reason). Because those are two different questions which a bit of clarification on would be nice.
Its a nice mindset for sure and a welcome change, but honestly even x3 for the capture point isnt that much, still an improvement is an improvement, cant complain too much.
Based af, now these are the type of statistics I want to see.
A very welcome change, will already be more effective than the half baked desertion mechanic that was added so thats good.
These I dont like however, this will only encourage more toxic gameplay from those would be effected by the desertion stat changes.
Ah yes, I see no arguments happening over this haha.
You really did take your time writing this huh?
It felt odd at the time, but its a very welcome change, big shoutout to @Euthymia07-live for really helping enforce it too.
I do think its nice to have such a range of even niche weaponary, however I have to ask.
Will there be any attempts to retroactively fix items that should have been in the Tech Trees of many nations that were instead locked behind limited time Battlepass content?
An example being here the Solothurn S-100, a solution I would offer in this case would be to exchange the battlepass limited item with a Solothurn S-100 which was scoped, allowing the base S-100 to be moved into the German Tech Tree which is strong in need of a semi automatic AT Rifle, but especially one which was used widely by all axis armies of the time.
Certainly a welcome change, the more interaction from CM’s, the better, especially in non news threads. Would be cool to see your opinions on the suggestions we offer once in a blue moon.
Very nice change, I look forward to it.
Same again for the MG change, all small steps in fighting back against the SMG meta.
I mean, its something, doesnt at all address the fact the majority of the complaints were about its turning circle, and honestly all the jets having insanely artificially buffed turning circles. Jets should be a trade off of speed for turn rate.
About time, sorely needed and welcomed.
As a closing statement here, Im left hopefully optimistic here, I just hope I get to watch my hope crash and burn yet again, that would suck.
Can’t see what this can bring to the game else than toxicity. Unless as long as we don’t have clans.
Vanguard with Garand drum magazine and laser sight lol
Can you please clarify whether this very welcome change will be only for more recent premium/event squads or for all of them?
Honestly this sitrep could use another part, building upon the “operation transparency” with acknowledging what was handled well and what was handled poorly by the devs. It would show some level of honesty and good will towards the community. Then again the devs and their social media management aren’t too adept at reading the room when it comes to comms, seeing as they had the audacity to ask for “labor of love” steam award after seemingly leaving the game on life support to focus on Active Matter. I really hope that those promised devblogs will come soon and will include some outreach and acknowledgement of community’s concerns.
In fact, you can see the poll is not 100% vs 0% - it’s narrower than this. Obviously we’ll wait for more time.
We see actually in WT that many players want this type of thing. Of course WT does not dictate this game, so to be sure, we thought we’d do a poll to ask to confirm.
Doing a poll about it is precisely the best action we could do regarding it, and is what the community have been asking for - more of this type of thing, asking players first to confirm.
A friend of mine wants the ability to put plane pinups decals on tanks also. I speak in his stead because he is shy. It is of course not me. I would never paint a huge pinup on my jumbo front plate, ever! But he would.
Right this is a bit concerning to see, since Enlisted and War Thunder have become very different games, I mean a large reason I left WT for here, is because how arcade like WT has been becoming, Enlisted however still have a nice balance of casual to realism.
It might give the idea of the Alps but it isn’t, from the landscape to that house, but it could be Slovakia or that area in general, i also hope for Manchuria
I don’t see that ratio changing the majority of people don’t want Enlisted to become war thunder, if they wanted to play warthunder they would, at least then they’ll playing a game with more dev resources/ support.
Yeah I kinda agree with this.
@MajorMcDonalds, could you give any insight in the future about for instance, the unpopular event structures, how small the updates have been, and the general concerns of the future of the game?
Dont dramatize
They gave a poll and asked for community feedback in this. Its currently a 70+% NO DAWG
Its very good to ask, and I appreciate the gesture, even if i agree with you
Please continue to consult community in this regard
Plenty of us LEFT WAR THUNDER, precisely because of this reason (and because its 24/7 conquest hell)
Will you guys also add an extra soldier to ther Soviet female medic squad or other unfinished squads? Maybe add on AT to the Medic squads so the squad is comparable to the Chinese Thompson squad?
(I promise to buy it if you do)
Excuse me, but when this

will appear on your roadmap?
What about kikka and F80
They also have more than 500kg loadouts
Kikka have almost nothing else though. Probably the plane with the least ammunition of the game (planes without guns apart)
All
Maybe it’s better to keep the old bombs, but with a reduced effectiveness against infantry while maintaining their effectiveness against vehicles?
It’s a matter of opinion, but I absolutely hate the Meteor as a vehicle that obliterates half a team in one strike, but I absolutely adore it as a means of clearing out annoing tanker mold from the gray zone.
Also, a Meteor bomb crater is the best place to build a rally point. Especially on points that are just a f*cking field with rocks 4.