What kind of US Army line-up can you make for Tunisia that doesn’t include the Garand…? I’m not exaggerating. M1 Carbines only supported by a M3 Lee, no SMGs and no MGs.
Yeah, soldier by soldier, you are missing about 80% of the equipment on your guys.
“Hey Fred, give me a authentic US Tunisia line-up.”
“One authentic US Tunisia line-up…”
“And hold the Garands.”
“Hold the Garands…?”
“And hold the BAR.”
“Hold the BAR…?”
“And hold the Thompson.”
“Hold the Thompson…?”
“And hold the Sherman.”
“Hold the Sherman? Hey Jimmy! Give me M1 Carbines with nothing!”
“Nothing…?”
Your solution to not being able to make a American line-up, is to admit defeat and not make one…?
Interesting tactic…
Not that it would help much, where can I get my Lewis guns (early-war item, but BR III) and lend-lease Thompsons…? Where Lanchester Mk I* with 50-round magazines…? Technically speaking, using the Mk III Churchill in any current Campaign but Tunisia would be historically inaccurate, but you’d be barred from even trying to do that…
And then we’d be back to the topic of banishing the Commonwealth from Western Europe again…
It could not… not seriously, not even within your own framework would BR I-II Tunisia be defensible.
What on earth gave you the idea that I am in favour of reducing the BRs of Tunisia…?
Are you even reading what I am writing…?
I am pointing out that your obsession doesn’t make any sense. It’s just an arbitrary line in the sand that you have drawn, on top of a system that doesn’t do what you think it does.
Are you reading how I’m voting?
I voted Tunisia to be BR 1-3.
The fact that I can also mention the options of BR1 or BR 1-2 only seems to make you enraged, everyone else is cool with discussing pixels in a videogame.
Apparently not, discussing pixels in a videogame counts as being “enraged”.
Fair, but you’re still arguing for it, and you are still in clearly favour of the option even if it isn’t your preffered one. Besides, the logic you are using to exclude BR IV works on every BR…
I don’t need anything explained to me, after 6 years in this game, I know this game.
There are always levels.
Two problems is better than four.
Removing jets from Stalingrad, Tiger 2 from Rzhev, Crusaders and Semoventes from Normandy and Ardennes, as well as T-28 from Stalingrad would already be wonderful and so much better than what we have now.
Just because there are edge cases in maps, let Tunisian Tiger H1 actually fight there, the M10, Achilles (?) and Firefly were there too as I said, BRIV Panther can be ignored as Puma in Moscow.
BRV no thanks in Tunisia, but BRIV is essentially as advanced as I want to get with vehicles and tanks in most games…
As much as we wish for it, the campaign system won’t be coming back. I’m personally okay with all maps having all BR’s at this point considering all the ahistorical nonsense added in the tech tree. May as well. Enlisted feels like a casual alt-history game at this point which I’m honestly fine with. If I want historical accuracy / realism, I’d play easy red 2 or hell let loose.
