Just strafe it, it’s honestly the easiest thing to kill if the person in it isn’t playing it right.
1 Like
I guess it’s time to bring T-28/E and M3 Grant to BR3 too. Why not bring all tanks to BR3? What a brilliant idea
4 Likes
But if person play it right its a cancer though
You must try harder. Look i will show you:
it just shows you that the developers had no faith in the Soviets to begin with so they tried to push the Axis gear all to higher BRs 
just that the developers making more excuse for more Soviet nonsense buffs by putting all the GE equipment on higher BRs what next 75/32 M41 BR III
2 Likes
That’s the player, I could say the same of the PPSH-41
2 Likes
You can easily destroy it with your plane, tank or even at gun.
Not as cancer as BR2/BR3 soviet vehicle lineups.
BR2
BR3
Now i can create even bigger cancer with KV-2
2 Likes
OK, say it. It on a br 5
But at br5 KT is dominate
You have Panzerfauts 100 + T-34-100/IS-2 + Demo pack for that. And we are talking about BR2/3 not BR5. It’s easier to destroy KT than a KV-1 and it’s a fact.
2 Likes
Well, its easier to destroy IS-2. And quite easyer
1 Like
Its not great br3 material but it shouldn’t have faced BR1 like ever
SiG is the strongest HE slinger in the game. The second best is SiG but loaded with HEAT rounds. It has significantly better gun than any other tank in the game and moving it up so more experienced players will face it instead of some newbies being destroyed by forces beyond their comprehension
4 Likes
There are plenty of skilled players who have a play lower BRs, no matter where you go there will always be some inexperienced players. The tank is a BR II tank, not BR III.
3 Likes
no big ass guns should NEVER face br 1 even if people is capable of handle it with crappy guns doesnt quit the fact still being a fucking nuke
1 Like
Then just make it so none of the BRs are connected. Haven’t people been asking for that? Also it’s an event venue so it’s not that common.
1 Like
until we get +0 mm this is not possible sadly
1 Like
I’ll bite.
I can’t remember the exact figure, but the SIG’s HE filler is something like 40-50% more than the KV-2, and it reloads faster. The absolute epitome of a glass cannon. I think BR 3 makes sense for it, as you get the strongest HE shell in the game on a crap platform, meaning the best way to play this vehicle is at long distances in the grey zone, near ammo refills.
For any gear that has a niche role and is opportunistic, I think it’s important that it sits at a BR that, when it has those niche opportunities, it performs better than other options but isn’t gamebreakingly strong. I think the SIG was gamebreakingly strong at BR 2.
Ah yes! Thanks.
KV-2 HE radius: 30.36m
SIG HE Radius: 46.50m
so yes, 53% larger radius, and 134% of a larger area (πr²) in a two-dimentional plane.
Any tank at BR5 gets easily destroyed if you have Panzerfaust 100. But not a single tank has such weak sides as KT at BR5.
And it’s fine for Germany to get some advantage while Soviet get dozen of advantages. Or do you want Germany of BR5 to be as pathetic and useless as BR2/3 Ger with nothing outside of few premiums/gold order weapons being good and usable?
2 Likes
just to clarify that is the fragmentation radius.
1 Like