ok, not need to reveal even more details of where you live lets just leave it like that
It’s based on historical precedent and having distinct role. What about every other class that is “Riflemen but…”
I’m not giving anything away, really.
But seriously, if you wanted to find me in the UK, you’d have no chance.
I am off-grid. And yet I’m here… 
Idk man, feels unnecessary to add a whole other class to use a single weapon that barely impacts the game.
1 Like
I mean, they selectively listen to only those who agree with them
They bring up poll from a youtuber which we don’t even know people who voted actually play this game, over a poll from the forum
Like what’s the point of the forum if you gonna bring up a poll from a fking youtuber?
2 Likes
Who’s “they” in this instance?
Because that YouTuber was one of the first and most known enlisted content creator. He only posts enlisted content too so it’s safe to say that his audience are only there for enlisted.
“Coolness” and ‘I approve this to be added to the game“ are different things. Just ask the question ’should saboteurs be added to the game” and the result will be very different. Additionally, one should consider in principle whether such a class is good for the game. There already enough distractions for noobs in this game to play on and ignore the objective or teamwork. One more is not helpful, especially when it is similar to a pre-existing class in the game.
1 Like
Neutral polls on this forum and reddit were negative by majority about adding saboteurs.
A poll on a Sponsored-by-Enlisted-Youtubers-account obviously does not count as neutral.
Personally, I am very much not looking forward to the new saboteur class, but at least we should give them a try in the game first.
3 Likes
Not true at all.
This poll is proof otherwise. I have seen all polls and not 1 says they like. Preharps, you be so kind show proof?
So quick to want to add whithout testing…
1 Like
Lol. Holy hell. This is that forum dweller behavior i mentioned. It clearly means the same thing here. If you don’t want it in game then the new class would not be “cool”
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Did you not see the poll a few comments above?
I did see that. That poll wasnt even from enlisted players. This one is. That mod is wrong of course.
Now if you do like I wont insult you over it. Still roughly 25% players that want. They should of finished the Japanese tech tree before impasta time thou. Redit, YouTube and this forum is a no go for sabatours.
1 Like
You just called 75% of Enlisted player base low IQ. Thats the polls here im forum, youtube amd reddit. I ask for you to show proof and you said you know a guy. Yet you call me low IQ. You 75% an apology. Its now low not to want this style of unit in this game. Your a mod, show proffessionalism like the other mods.
I meant content to why did they make a poll.
1 Like
People are worried and winder if others are also. Like its hard enough to get players to take objectives or play them. This new class maybe to much horse play and burden the good players. We ask for other units in this game and this was not one of them. The is a problem with devs and players not communicating or seeing eye to eye. Jeeps, Japanese bombers tier 5 should of been priorty. So polls help to see how other players feel. What it dont show is what good players think vs just soo soo players. Most YouTubers are againts this.
We need a dev to start talking to players. No mods but player to devs straight.
May come a time for playera to go on strike even 1 weekend
1 Like