Shame on you!

You could be right

Maybe they play RU more but wehrabs are more active on their forum section

I mean, just go to their section and look at their profile pictures, some of them are basically screaming: I’m a wehraboo

And there are a lot of German mains on their section like mooleu and OMG_play

3 wehrabs is 3 more than 0
as far as I noticed there aren’t any true wehrabs here.
All of the old buff Germany threads were mostly based on the on-paper stats, which were objectively in favor of the Soviets despite Germany having the higher winrate.

Because the Bazooka rockets are SHIT
Same in WT
Put one in the open top of a ZSU and didn’t even get a Hit lmao

I think it would help greatly though if they upped the render distance for shit since nothing renders when you’re in a plane until you’re about to slam into them.

Dude that game is complete and utter shite and is dead as fuck
It’s not a competitor anymore
Thank god for that

1 Like

More likely they’re sticking around to try to grind up to high levels before the German mains come back.

1 Like

I’m sad I haven’t seen a single PzIV yet
I want to split wigs

With literally infinite amounts of MGs overlooking the beach, if the Germans can’t stop Allies at the first point, they deserve to get stomped. Competent players will hold those points quite easily.

3 Likes

true

Germans have the upper hand

1 Like

Defending team in general has the upper hand in invasion. They can easily abuse the engineer builds.

This is even more prevalent in Moscow canpaign where maps are smaller. I’m happy that’s not the case in Normandy.

1 Like

me too but I do have to say most conquest maps on Normandy are garbage too

1 Like

Conquest is garbage. Make a great multiplayer game and then slap capture and hold the point on it. How original!!

I said it more times and I will say it again

Conquest should be lone fighters exclusive
Make more Invasion maps and give them to squads

Instead we have only 2 Invasion maps and 6-7 conquest maps

2 Likes

I appreciate this topic.

Okay so I’d have more of a suggestion rather than pure complaint. I would appreciate if armies (like germans) would share levels and progression across campaigns. While I know people like the authenticity and are very nitpicky about tiny details, wouldn’t it be more fun to have the whole armies’ arsenal at your disposal and not just the fraction which was used on the XYZ front?

That would also cut down on IMO redundant grind and open up maybe even more squad combinations. That way you can wear the uniform you like most across fronts in a still relatively authentic fashion. Maybe even add vehicles and aircrafts as one bigger collection per faction instead of multiple armies you have to level up from 0. That way we could even have a playlist and randomly get into one of many campaigns with the same army and progression.

I dont understand what you meant

Add Eastern Front winter troops to Normandy summer???

1 Like

Bit of an extreme but if people choose to be a bright target then why not? And I’m only giving this idea because the game advertises squad customization. Similar to Warthunder you can have the wrong camo in the desert and be a nice, visible target.

Like i said, not exactly historically accurate but still authentic and a better way to monetize than pink camo.

The main focus of my suggestion is cutting down on the grind and making the armies more unified, giving people an incentive to play multiple campaigns.

I for one am not a huge lot into history, not enough to know what guns, gear and vehicles were used on what front. Maybe i’ll notice if a bright yeti looking guy is running through a wheat field but otherwise it’s the same to me because my knowledge isn’t as in-depth

I appreciate the enthusiasm

BUT

Enlisted is and should stay historically accurate and thats what developers focus about
And honestly, I want Enlisted to stay historical
image

I see and understand. Maybe keeping campaigns historically accurate is the better way to go. But at the very least I would appreciate shared levels between armies of the same nation. Maybe letting people choose outfits for their squads according to each campaign. So in your inventory you would have Squad Alpha with loadouts(weapons and outfit) for each campaign.

Because otherwise you may find your favourite army in your favourite campaign and never touch the other ones because you don’t feel like starting over or that campaign doesn’t have things you like or enjoy

I don’t like the idea of artificially inflated grind. That’s my main gripe.

No, it would not.

Care to elaborate? Not much of a discussion if there’s no counter-argument coming.

Something needs to be done about the rockets on aircraft, they’re real annoying

1 Like