Do I really need to explain that comparing the Battlefield series to a Gaijin title makes no sense?
They’re completely different kinds of games and projects.
Or do you already understand that?
Fun point, the BF6 developer fought with the players, which reduced the review and the number of users, and the developer who saw it surrendered and relaxed the conditions.
A funny fact: in BF4 you could upload your own decals — and people really did. You could even export emblem templates through a certain website (Eye of Sauron, or a bunch of other banned symbols), and trash-talk in the chat as much as your vocabulary allowed.
And now you get banned just for typing GG.
2 Likes
In the end, the developers should not try to fight users.
Because the end was always bad.
1 Like
there is a saying: dont bite the hand that feeds you.
Though there is a distinctive difference between banning a few users and fighting your own playerbase.
1 Like
Ideally, no, it’s not worth it.
But in practice, we don’t really have a choice right now.
CoD has lost ground, though it might make a comeback in a couple of years.
Arma 4 hasn’t been released yet and is still in beta. (arma reforge)
There are niche projects like Squad, HLL, and Enlisted.
And Battlefield is the current leader
Honestly, it wouldn’t have been this bad if only the abusing player had it solved.
But it’s not wise to fight against all users to blocking it.
What DEV has done now is the latter.
They could have just have Made the booster be desactivated after getting em 
1 Like
Or just limited boosters to be used only in multiplayer and not casuals…