At low br Germany you could whale yourself to increase your power to reach similar power level as Soviets and USA (but still worse than M1A1) but at high BR you can’t throw money as all German guns are completely inferior to both USSR/USA TT unlocks and events/premiums.
True and not even money can save us and the only thing it will get us is just to fighting state but not on the same level as a Soviets or the allies.
But it doesn’t.
There’s quite huge difference between downing an enemy and killing an enemy.
In vast majority of cases it kills in a single hit since dmg is over 13.5 even at 100m. And even if it downs enemy it’s not end of the world as you have 24 more rounds to wipe him and entire squad of enemies.
And you will be downing Soviets constantly at BR5 instead of killing them in a single hit with your brand new Scotti Naval Rifle as that gun has below 13.6 dmg at mid range so i hope you will be happy with your purchase! With such massive dmg drop off it’s a Rifle in name only.
No no with him pointing out such things I think he means the Japanese and the Germans should actually get some form of standardization of damage to their weapons so everyone can be equal considering it doesn’t down in one shot from what he says.
No, that’s not how it works.
You need 20.0 dmg to 100% kill an enemy with full health reliably everytime.
Anything between 10.0 and 20.0 downs an enemy with percentual chance to kill the enemy the higher the number is.
Of course, without vitality perk.
In many cases, shooting down an enemy means they fall somewhere you can’t shoot anymore, or simply survive for some other reason.
There’s an extreme difference between guaranteed one hit drop dmg and guaranteed one hit kill dmg.
If that wasn’t the case, there would be no point in having this mechanic in the game at all. And no point in increasing dmg to BAs way back then.
If you are trying to pretend like the difference doesn’t matter, then you simply have no clue what are you even talking about in the first place.
And which weapon will have higher chance of killing people instead of downing?
Scotti with 14.5 - 10m and 11.9 - 100m
or
Fedorov Rifle with 15.1 - 10m and 13.6 - 100m
Just by going through your logic no matter what you will say Fedorov Rifle is just better. And Fedorov Avtomat will also perform slightly better than Scotti as you won’t waste as many bullets and be able to fire for longer.
You also don’t need to worry about TMNT armor that increase enemy hp to almost 15HP. (14.9HP). Due armor higher dmg per bullet of Scotti is completely negated and both Fedorovs deal more dmg per shot than Scotti.
This is not a BR1-3 where you can argue that body armor won’t be used by a lot of people, at BR5 many have them and my entire army have them equipped and ready to block and negate a lot of shots. What will say to dude that just unlocked Scotti rifles and be going vs my entire lineup full of cuirasses?
You also ignore massive and very sharp damage fall of. So my point still stands Scotti naval rifle is only a rifle in the name.
Scotti - 14.4 dmg -10% from body armor = 13.6 dmg which is still worse than Fedorov Avtomat (13.9 dmg) despite having just 15 rounds and much worse recoil. Did you forget that Fedorov got massive buff few months ago?
Scotti Naval Rifle belongs on a workbench and need a full rework (aka buff).
I think they updated the scotti in the last day or so.
Feels like laser…
BUT…
How it feels was never the issue for me
He won’t admit it but he’s actually a PVE advocate.
That’s the intention because for those at the top of the food chain they cannot be threatened
I used the Scotti for the first time in battle tonight. It wasn’t too bad, however it could definitely benefit from a 25 round magazine along with an increase the ROF to maybe 650. I still prefer to use the Stg 44 though, but may consider it more if they raised the mag size.
You’re just being a biased buffoon, as you literally always are.
Anyone who has tried to shoot a federov rifle on a test server knows that it’s pretty much impossible to hit anything at 100m with it in full auto. Even with a fully maxed soldier with recoil perks.
Nobody will ever use it on 100m in the first place.
It is truly pathetic how you can never accept the simple fact that you are wrong.
If it’s a waste of time debating with anyone on this forum, it’s the duo of you and the parrots.
Not to mention my point was not even to tell what weapon is better. Neither of them is meta, that’s quite obvious to anyone who’s just slightly competent.
And where i said i’m using or willing to use it in full auto. I always used that gun in semi fire. And it’s nowhere near as weak as you people make it to be. It’s really accurate if you can handle vertical recoil and 1hk German soldiers or at bare minimum downs them every single shot.
I was using it at the very far distances and doing great i was surprised how much dmg you can dish out compared to usual semis. Maybe it’s time to adapt instead of complaining that Germans are so strong and need to get nerfed for once?
You never proved me wrong. Yes you will sometimes down players instead of outright killing but it’s never a problem for a gun with 25 rounds while for a gun with 15 rounds it’s a grave issue that you can’t avoid.
Two most infamous criminals with hefty fine above their heads, when we can expect the bounty hunters coming our way?
Remember always be positive, no hate, no toxicity and end the day with at least one idea how to nerf Germany.
It’s fine i never said that any of them are meta but Feddy Rifle is significantly stronger than Scotti Naval Rifle. It’s a fact and you just need to press H once instead of going full auto like with MG42 100 while jumping around.
There are other way stronger guns but what’s the point of a BP gun in it’s not fun and can’t compete against average power level of it’s BR? Who’s going to use Scotti rifle if they can use STG44 or Squad with 9x FG42 II? Nobody except masochists or Italian roleplayers.