You do know the is a difference between complaint and negative opinion, no?
i would highly prefer if we had the option to choose if we want that 1 vehicle squad or all 4 slots be infantry, but when it comes to grinding and being unable to skip stuff you dont wanna use, there could be a solution by dividing the progress tree.

i thought this through for the simplicity sake, and i believe the best option is to divide the progression tree into 4 progress lines, first, the main one would be rifles, or any other weapon for that matter, and we could grind squads that use those weapons, and fully grind them out first if we want to, same thing goes for the rest, you will be able to choose whichever line you want to grind out first, and it wont be a singular line in which you will have no choice but to grind few infantry squads, then a airplane, then tank and so on.
this progression tree is of course for every campaign
Complain is to say that something is wrong or not satisfactory. You are expressing your negative opinion about that stuff so it can be seen as a complaint.
And i said it was weird, get over it.
Read again.
Based on you faulty logic, anyone who wants to make a bug report on some issue should refrain from doing so because they themselves don’t know how to fix it.
Example 1:
User: “AI is useless, pls fix”
Devs: “Yes, but do you know how to fix it?”
User: “no”
Devs: “Ok, shut up then”
Example 2:
User: “scoped SVTs shoot high, pls fix”
Devs: “Yes, but do you know how to fix it?”
User: “no”
Devs: “Ok, shut up then”
Example 3:
User: “This game needs matchmaking”
Devs: “Yes, but do you know how to do it?”
User: “no”
Devs: “Ok, shut up then”
erm… it should be Users:“yes”
only if you know how to code:)). Knowing what a matchmaker does doesn’t mean you know how to write one
it is not really that hard… problem is not enough playerbase for MM. current queue MM has sometimes problems matching players within ~minute range. for any other MM to work it needs a lot more players or otherwise you would risk waiting 5-10 minutes for a match.
Buy it and upgrade it on Normandy then transfer it to Berlin. This way you can have fully upgraded scoped G43s before you unlock the upgrades in the techtree
The term “negative opinion” is first used by you, you considered your opinion as negative opinion LOL.
Example 1:
User: “AI is useless, pls fix”
Devs: “Yes, but do you know how to fix it?”
User: “no”
Devs: “Ok, shut up then”Example 2:
User: “scoped SVTs shoot high, pls fix”
Devs: “Yes, but do you know how to fix it?”
User: “no”
Devs: “Ok, shut up then”Example 3:
User: “This game needs matchmaking”
Devs: “Yes, but do you know how to do it?”
User: “no”
Devs: “Ok, shut up then”
Lol, At least those thing you told them what to do. But you just say that thing is weird and that thing is actually not a problem, it is basically your rant. How can dev fix your problem when you didn’t tell them what you want it to be?
Besides that, it is not possible to be fix, since swapping levels must have this effect.
Besides that, it is not possible to be fix, since swapping levels must have this effect.
Finally… took you long enough to figure it out.
But you just say that thing is weird and that thing is actually not a problem
Because it a side effect of the above and there’s nothing you can do, but it can still piss you off because you have to regrind a level and the thing you were grinding for is now one level away. Can you do anything about it? No. Is it that much o a big deal? 34k points?.. Not really. Can it be a little bit frustrating? Sure.
Got it now???
Now let it go, the only reason this looks like a rant is that i have to find new simple ways to explain to you the concept of “this is weird, but not a big deal”
Finally… took you long enough to figure it out.
I already know this so that is why I asked you for solution.
Because it a side effect of the above and there’s nothing you can do, but it can still piss you off because you have to regrind a level and the thing you were grinding for is now one level away. Can you do anything about it? No. Is it that much o a big deal? 34k points?.. Not really. Can it be a little bit frustrating? Sure.
Got it now???
Now let it go, the only reason this looks like a rant is that i have to find new simple ways to explain to you the concept of “this is weird, but not a big deal”
There is really no point of bringing this thing to the forum when you know why dev did that and this thing can’t be solve, this is what I want to tell you.
There is really no point of bringing this thing to the forum when you know why dev did that and this thing can’t be solve, this is what I want to tell you.
You’re really obsessing over this.
its quite obvious that people dont want to repetitivly grind the same weapons over and over again
I just realised that i have to grind again for a squad that i already unlocked on Tunisia.
It was as a joke answer. The only reason the discussion went any further is because you didn’t get it.
You’re really obsessing over this.

Did i ruin it for him?
he want every time have the point on every discussion, i stopped even answer him
personally i dont see a problem there… yeah you need to regrind your AT squad, but you get engineers much earlier and they give you lots of bonus xp. in some matches i can earn 500-1000xp just on rally points, so overall you can get to 9th level much sooner
It was as a joke answer. The only reason the discussion went any further is because you didn’t get it.
Lol you literally said this you call it relevant ,if it is a joke you can say it right away not giving those useless explanations.
the topic is called “repetitive grinding” and while i am aware of the benefits of having engineers at level 5, what i said still fits with the theme of the post. I made posts where i explained what a collosal chore it is to grind a 180k level for a tank that i won’t ever use, imagine if this were to happen at a higher level and you’d have to grind AGAIN that 180k tank level.
he want every time have the point on every discussion, i stopped even answer him
Lol, last time you are the one who had comments on my reply on the Bersaglieri squad.You just ignore my explanation and always think you are right Lol. You just use he wants every time to have the point as an excuse to escape discussion. If you really have the point, you will not afraid of discussing it. Only people who don’t have point will give a bunch of excuse like you. Ignoring people is just being a coward, because you didn’t even dare to discuss.
Karen
-if a player has grinded 1 campaign fully (lets say berlin for example), the already unlocked weapons that cost 1 or 2 silver orders will be unlocked in another campaign, without the need to put down a single xp to unlock.
No. The different campaigns have different balancing, based on the adversaries as well as the map layouts. Simply enabling players to get things far ahead of what they should be able to would NOT be healthy for gameplay balance. It may be annoying to grind them again, but so be it.
now, there will obviously be conflicting issues where the same weapons cost different amount in campaigns
for example gewehr 43 sniper costs 3 orders on berlin, and it costs only 2 in normandy. the solution to that is to just change the prices, so we dont wind up having to unlock the same weapons anyways.
The prices are different because the environments are different. A semi-auto sniper on Normandy fairs much differently than they do on Berlin. Why? Mostly because of map layout, as well as other weapons present in that campaign.