My nine teammates are all robots,
so I’m just complaining about the low level of artificial intelligence.
Additionally, my requirements?
lord_sith said:
Players who do not actively capture strategic positions during combat, and who fail to engage in killing or supporting actions,
such passive behaviors in combat are considered improper gameplay.
So this is not something I specified.
Nothing new, still not sure how this is connected to removing AA guns.
Im pretty sure the Sith teaching translate into we need to remove AA guns and sniper rifles because of that.
Yeah, checks out.
Its agreeing with Op’s viewpoint,
All the things I mentioned are completely useless in the hands of ‘the robot players’
They used the engineers to build the respawn point just 200 meters away, construct AA, at, and then shoot at the clouds and rocks. not enemy plane, tank or solders.
they keep constantly repeat the requirement for marking.
and they take pride in getting low scores and losing battles.
Even when they were playing the role of engineers, they only used rifles to pretend that they were snipers.
Hammer? Perhaps it’s in their brains.
PS：
However, the real robot commander doesn’t think so.
They sometimes do better.
So remove AA guns and machine guns so competent players cannot use them as well, makes sense.
The only one who take pride is you, you constantly post and flex with your stats even though no one asked for it.
I’d rework them, we have a good example of airforce call ins in games like squad/post scriptum etc
so many options like make them not share cd with artillery, make the whole raid smaller, introduce AI Stukas that drop bomb on radio point etc, it could all be worked around instead of outright removal
They are proficient in using any content, but op is also causing them to lose the usable game content.
Perhaps you don’t understand what the art of language is, or to put it bluntly, this is a form of irony.
I hope you can keep on studying and at least complete the courses of the neighborhood university.
Wish you success in your studies!
I see many experienced players using data to showcase their heroism.
Why can’t I do the same?
Are you making rules specifically targeting me,
instead of going after those “robots” who play passively and break the game’s rules?
It seems you enjoy and support athletes who cheat in sports.
Why don’t you simply go to the bar and openly criticize those players who play negatively or cheat in the Super Bowl, NBA or World Cup?
please, are you going to the team’s training ground to criticize the athletes for boasting about their gold medals and trophies?
Or are you going to the military cemetery to confront those recipients of military awards, criticizing them for showing off their efforts and sacrifice?
Unfortunately, all I can see from your words is the color of jealousy.
PS: Maybe you should first criticize many Germans. They are proud of having contributed to the unification of Prussia and having dominated the land and people of the Holy Roman Empire. However, the French, the Russians, the British, the Italians, the Turks, the Greeks, and many others did not make any demands.
They did not ask the Prussians to establish Germany.
PS：
They also did not ask the emergence of Neo-Nazism organizations or institutions within Germany.
Shouldn’t you go to their assembly point and confront them face to face?
Just as you are accusing me.
PS：
Or, are you preventing me? Who r a normal player showing how to conduct normal gameplay? Are you preventing me from sharing my achievements to demonstrate to other normal players how to abide by the game rules while playing? Or are you promoting and supporting those “bots” that engage in negative combat and violate the game rules and player guidelines?
Like in this case, I think it’s necessary for you to go there so that you can confront them face-to-face and criticize their behavior.
You can also volunteer to participate in the police operation in Paris to capture the celebrating crowd (rioters).
Dumbest take I’ve heard, you’re just anti fun and selfish. Let players play the way they want to play. It’s not all about you so stop crying when people don’t play the way YOU want them to play.
A ridiculous viewpoint
Opposing fun? Their idea of fun is feed enemy, refusing teamwork, and rejecting learning how to properly use engineers, weapons, and soldiers.
They follow the nonsense spouted by certain YouTube streamers, rushing into high BR rooms with just a semi-automatic or fully automatic weapon. It’s like forcing civilians to fight as soldiers in the Battle of Verdun—now that’s no fun at all.
And it leads to more veterans being sacrificed for this. So who’s actually having fun? No one feels happy.
Only antisocial individuals who reject teamwork and conspire to cause defeat could possibly find joy in this.
For their own enjoyment, anyone can do anything in the editor and their custom rooms (except for negative combat, exploiting game mechanics, or cheating), as developers have banned players who profit from using game mechanics in custom rooms.
Yet, they deliberately engage in matchmaking battles to pursue their own pleasure by sacrificing the interests of other regular players.
So who is selfish?
They constantly complain that events require too many points, that they can’t complete the entire event to get all the rewards. They moan about earning too little and claim they need to spend hours every day playing the game.
I always teach them how to play properly, how to earn more points, how to collect more silver coins and research points.
All I do is guide others to become ordinary players, encouraging them to surpass me and reach higher levels.
My performance clearly shows that I’m just an average player—not a veteran or a high-level one.
As for deleting game content, please refer to the above( that the talk with captain). If you don’t understand what “irony” means, please make an effort to study.
According to Op’s perspective, he is likely thinking of deleting all the extra content and changing “enlisted” to “CS:go”.
His proposal to eliminate the air strikes by bombers was merely the first step he took.
According to his view, he believes that the air strikes by bombers are inefficient and useless.
But those other actions, from the perspective of normal players, are also inefficient and have a relatively small impact on the game situation.
For instance, the useless camping sniper; the useless tanks and aircraft; the teammates who keep bombarding you with mortars and messengers; the ones who refuse to use engineers; even the players who refuse to use the frontline respawn radio; the camping engineer who uses at and aa to shoot clouds and stones at the rear; the teammate who builds barbed wire and sandbags at the entrance of your strategic position to prevent your side from entering.
Therefore, after experiencing the negative impact of these players’ combat behaviors multiple times, in the future, he will post again on the forum, demanding the removal of more content.
No, their idea of fun is playing the game casually. If someone wants to reenact saving pvt Ryan by using a sniper just let them. It’s a casual game that everyone deserves to enjoy. If they prevent you from having fun I’m sure there’s a more competitive game out there for you to play.
If everyone, or the majority of people, are enjoying happiness. Then why do you oppose OP?
Why do you keep complaining about the constantly increasing events that last for one month?
Why don’t you keep the cross-game mode on and enjoy the fun together with the PC players?
Why do you support the new changes made by the developers?
Why do you keep hoping to reduce the BR value of German weapons?
Why do you have a different opinion about plate armor?
If you belong to the group of people you described who enjoy games, then why are you complaining?
Shouldn’t you look for a game that is more fair and has powerful German-made weapons game?
PS:
You can also experience it in a match battle. Find three friends to be your team members. Let them hide in the rear area during the match battle and constantly call for artillery strikes and air raids. Don’t build respawn points, don’t build AA, AT and light/heavy machine gun shelters, and even don’t fire guns.
Continue this for 100 match battles. Then, when you are ready, please tell me that during these 100 battles, you had a great time and were very happy.
Your three friends will also fully agree with you.
If any of you are feeling unhappy, why don’t you think deeply about it? Is there really a game where one can move freely without following the rules?
stupid idea, what we need is mod the bombers, revert some of the nerfs and make it be worth depending of the br, different planes, different loads, not this, and make it don’t step on normal strikes
I don’t complain about increased events, I love move events. I just hate their slow drip fed format.
Why do I keep cross play off? Hmm well if you look at every single outlisted post and look at the names, tell me how many console players are on there? Just because I have it off doesn’t mean I’m playing any less of a game than anyone else.
Why wouldn’t i support the decisions of the devs of the game i enjoy? There’s times I don’t agree with them, and i voice that opinion. Nashorn being BR 4 for example.
I want to reduce weapons & vehicles that warrant being reduced, not just German.
Any other irrelevant questions you want me to answer? The difference between you and I is I don’t get mad at the way people play, cry about it and ask for content removed. Yes i think there’s definitely things in the game that require less skill and as I explained, if I had to pick something to be removed it would be artillery but I’m not up in arms calling for it to be removed and getting mad at people just trying to play the game.
I don’t need that experience, because I play the game and do my part every time I play, even if I lose I can confidently say that I did all i could for my team. It’s just a game.
At the very least, I believe some adjustments are necessary. For example, we should be able to request airstrikes and artillery fire simultaneously without any issues; we should shorten the time between the arrival of an airstrike and the actual bombing; and we should be able to adjust the size and number of bombs based on the BR. As things stand, the effectiveness of airstrikes is significantly low, and they actually hinder effective friendly artillery fire, so it’s clear that it would be better to remove them entirely. This effectively works to the enemy’s advantage.
Your double standard.
As for my suggestion to delete more content, I suggest you study what " Verbal Irony" means in the context of " Sarcasm".
Rather than being like a diode.
Why is it called a diode? You might need to study the principles of a diode.
Have you really disabled cross-game functionality? Oh, I’m not denying your skill level and gaming ability.
If you have disabled cross-game functionality, it indicates that you are complaining that PC players are interfering with your gaming experience.
Then why don’t you try playing the cross-game?
If PC gamers are allowed to disable cross-game functionality, do you know how many of them would choose to do so?
You can guess why these PC gamers want to disable cross-game functionality.
Although you did all the work, but the others in your team did nothing and said: “It’s an easy game.”
Even they might blame you, saying that it was you who reduced their kill count and who caused the battle to end quickly.
They will accuse you of cheating.
They will claim that your efforts are meaningless, that the efforts you made for the team are merely hindering them from having fun.
Although they are your teammates, they will deliberately throw incendiary bombs and explosives at the character you are playing as the soldier.
Shoot at you continuously with guns. Use tanks and jeeps to crash into the rallypoint you have built.
Because they think your score is higher than theirs.
Even when you were live-streaming, they will form several groups of four people and then keep catch you all time.
The console game platform effectively protects your SAN value.
Its funny how the USSR and Allies bombers auto aim you instantly but the Axis bombers are absolutely harmless xD
You know, for someone who claims to use irony, you write A LOT.
Tbf some of them are Italian and switch sides.
Not a double standard because you’re sitting here demanding things be removed when i merely said if i had to pick one thing it would be: we’re not the same.
I play with crossplay on every now and again or to play with friends on PC. Never complained about PC players “ruining my experience” either. I merely stated that outlisted is full of PC players who cheat so to 100% steer clear of them I decide to keep it off. I’m sure you PC players would have crossplay off too if you could, but I’m interested to know why because you PC players really aren’t as superior to console players as some of you claim to be 
Well if you’re claiming all these things are happening to you on PC then why would I want to turn crossplay on?
They are free flying XP the Soviet and the Allies are some wall of fire they auto aim you better not even go near them unless you are using some plane with a lot of fire power and speed xD
I said it. Please learn " Verbal Irony" means in the context of " Sarcasm".
This is a method of using a viewpoint that aligns with the other party’s perspective (op’s perspective), based on that perspective, and presenting an even more extreme viewpoint to refute the other party.Please study.
like this book u can read and study：
The Gift of the Magi
The Great Gatsby