Sure its a lie it was in the updates
I just mean it’s not 2-2.5x, but 4-6x, there’s a misuderstanding here
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Ok i get you my bad fuck sake i keep misreading things…I thought you meant something else >w< my bad again.
i mean for smgs it is a good feature, it stops people from using them as a long range weapon
And can’t even show it in forum cause it breaks the rule.One sure way of keeping hidden data so they can do stealth buff/nerf without no one noticing.
For reference the new Fedorov has 0.35 dispersion meanwhile MP43/1 after the nerf still gets a 0.70 max dispersion
This was the closest target on the range so no its a really shit feature.
You should still be able to hit enemies at range will smg’s firing one round at a time its not like smg’s should have piss poor accuracy past 30 yards and should only be good at really close range.
For example suppresed Erma has poor accuracy at longer range, quite similar to regular Erma EMP except suppresed one should be able to fire more distant due to longer barrel, all 9 mm are good at longer distances, the best is schmeisser mk36 for me, the kiraly surprised me
Well that makes sense. Should we also implement system like this for bolt-actions ?
I mean it would stop people using bolt-actions in cqc as its clearly not cqc weapon.
How about shotguns ? Perhaps those shouldnt be allowed to be shot at all under 45 degree angel as they are supposed to be hunting guns ?
its not a modern day SMG
Just because it isnt a modern day smg mate doesn’t mean it should sometimes have the accuracy of a flintlock pistol at 30 yards.
World war 2 submachine guns were still pretty accurate just because there old doesn’t mean they fired off at angles.
funny thing just happened, i jsut tried out the smgs on the target range and hit all in the black from the bunker and even got a %40 hit rate on the target out at 50 meters with out really trying
i think you are just not aimming right
no you should not, its a smg, its burst fire or automatic
pretty accurate, means that it can hit, not that it can score bulls eyes
Mate. I was aiming dead center every time how is that “not aiming right”
Yes you should be able too mate. You can fire smg’s single shot pretty accurately
It should still not rear off and fire off at angles hence why the current dispersion system is shite.
Shitty random roll the dice accuracy has no place in enlisted. Sure dispersion over distance would be okay however the way it currently works is just odd. I mean its as if the rifling on the barrels is fucked.
i did it and it seems only every 3 shot is astray, so your doing something wrong and at
yea we “can” but by tapping the tigger you would jerk the tigger meaning that you just jerked your sights off the target thus MISSING
it does have a place in enlisted in the sense that as a avid shooter, even small nicks in/on the barrel can affect how the bullet flys and thus how accurate it is, this aint some cod where e have freshly minted weapons
I didn’t want to say anyone’s doing anything wrong. But I’m still lasering people in Stalingrad with SMGS and MGS. If I look at the OPS picture that kind of dispersion single fire would make me angry. Problem is IM not getting that in practice against players. Absolutely lasering them.
1ST OFF this is not the closest its the 3rd closest at about 20 meters and it seems you got 9 “misses” to about 20 hits?
the missed bullets dont matter when you shoot another three that all hit
shoulda clarified. I do half second bursts at long range (rifle combat range) with MGS and smg and still land enough headshots for kill at that range. no where near the dispersion in that picture.
remember when the PPSH could engage targets at 100 meters better then a rifle purely due to the amount of bullets it chunked