I am just curious, why don’t you name campaigns Barbarossa and Western Front or something IDK?
Non of us history buffs would have anything to complain (T28 was not at Moscow, bla bla bla), and it would give you more space to maneuver with minor nations, equipment, prem squads and so on?
Overall this update seems really solid and balanced well!
Premium squads seems balanced and get weapons people asked for.
The new vehicles and guns (especially the tanks in Moscow and Thompson in normandy) will be a good reason for players to keep play the game and are interesting and well balanced (except the T-50) good job!
Heavier and heavier tanks coming…
What about tank destroyers? You already have Jagdpanzer IV and Jagdpanther modeled. They would also be a good tradeoff between good front armor nad mobility.
What? From when did battle of Moscow took place in 1942? First action for Tigers was september 42 near Leningrad for 3 tanks, which got either stucked or broken.
Whats the problem with Chafee in Normandy may i ask? That premium PZ III is miles better than it. Chafee is literally little bit better Stuart with bigger gun thats all.
The problem with it is not its power but historical accuracy. Niether Jumbo or Chaffee fought in Normandy. They showed up later that year, after that particular battle.
But, as Keofox said, from now it is at least clear that devs don’t bother with such subtle details and we will get things that were used in that “year”, not 100% accurate to the campaigns we have.