why should I be against it? oh yeah, I’m a soviet maine…
and what do we have here? a forum topic about the historicity of Soviet weapons. yeah, that came out awkward.
and what do we have here? a forum topic about the historicity of Soviet weapons. yeah, that came out awkward.
It’s strange, I need to grow up, but you don’t realize the consequences of offensive statement on the forum. It’s very strange.
are you sure about that? and this is an old site with old information so i cant compare it to a current beretta. so only the combination with the cuirass makes this weapon really strong in the hands of an experienced player.
Honestly the ideal solution would be too just delete the body armour so that Germany mains would not have any excuse for complaining and they move the Uragan back with 7 damage (as the MP-40 has) and 550-ish fire rate. Everybody is staisfied, balance restored, we live happily ever after.
1 Like
I have one, but I hadn’t planned on playing that event to get it, I just had a ton of 100-200% boosters that I wanted to use before they expired, and the next thing I knew, I was the proud owner of a batshit white MP40. I didn’t let it go to waste as I gave it to one of my fighter pilots.
1 Like
Really?
I have a couple of thoughts on this matter. But no one will like it. Especially the developers.
2 Likes
I mean, if in the real world a substitute was sought because the weapon was already obsolete, expect it to be better in the game? Use higher-level weapons and stop complaining. German players are just long-suffering women.
in an optimal world - PPS43 would be at least equal to PPSH41, but rate of fire simply matters too much in this game.
and you have shown me exactly what? that pps is better than mp40 in majority of use cases?
if mp40/pps43 was balanced around vitality, then it would be somewhat balanced. mp40 would get better performance within 15m and pps43 after 15m, but BR2 is not balanced around vitality. majority of players and bots on BR2 dont have vitality and only experienced players do. when experienced players play, if they know about body armor, most of them will also carry body armor.
so out of 3 possible situations, pps43 gets advantage in 2 and in 1 it is somewhat balanced.
that is why i am for removal of body armor and that is why i say that pps42/43 has advantage over mp40/beretta on BR2.
it would just have mp40 stats but with 5m worse range.
5 Likes
The Soviets hate the concept of equality and fair gameplay and they can’t play without their hidden advantages and somewhat same goes to the Americans as well and also thanks to this mindset it kills off the veterans for those factions.
So at the end of the day we are stuck with people who just collect points instead of playing the actual game.
5 Likes
Yes.
Well no, not really. Its still better.
Anyway, because little numbers matters I calculated with rof + velocity + 40m distance how long does it take to hit target twice from pps & mp40
Mp40 ( velocity 400 rof 570 ) to hit twice at 40m it takes 0.205 seconds.
PPs43 ( velocity 450 rof 800 ) to hit twice at 40m it takes 0.1639 seconds.
So as you can see the PPs43 is significantly better and your graph just didnt take this in account.
But if you need another somekind of silly as fk excuse for soviet weapons
Id remind the Mp40 has 0.6 more dmg at 100m.
Perhaps you can use that as your next scapegoat.
2 Likes