Really its a cold world war game since majority of BR V equipment is cold war. How many jet to jet combats happened during World War 2 ? Here you see it all the time since they added the jets its no longer world war 2 game.
I really like Type 77 the side mag reminds me of Johnson.
The Korean War is part of the Cold War. Game developers have stated that they will only produce content related to World War II.
When they gonna remove BR V from the game then ? Since like 75% of the BR V equipment was used during the Korean war and not during world war 2. 
The M26 Pershing tank did see more significant operational service and impact during the Korean War compared to the final months of World War II same is with Jets. There was no jet to jet combat during world war 2 thatâs Cold War majority of the jets and equipment specially for the allies and the soviets is cold war era equipment.
No it is not
That is technically right but thatâs because there were not many jets built compared to all the other planes so they operated where they could. Even then what matters is that they were made and used in the war
Jets were born in this war and did see service
They were still used actively during the war. It doesnât matter if the M26s use was limited because it was made during the war and used during the war however much so
The ultimate point is that it is fine as long as it was made and/or used during the WW2. Prototypes are fine in my book too, as long as if they were made, designed, tested during and for the war. If its from WW2 itâs good
As far as I know, there were 9 pershings in korea, but 20 in germany
What are you talking about there was Over 300 +Pershingâs send to Japan during the Korean war and 146 saw active service. A total of 309 M26 tanks were fielded on the Korean Peninsula by the end of 1950, and 29 North Korean tanks were defeated by them during the same period. Its Korean War tank that saw limited service during world war 2 like the M2 Carabine. M2 Carabine also saw far more service during the Korean war and the jets Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star saw combat during only the Korean war and not during world war 2. If you like using allies BR V equipment sorry to brake it to you but more of the BR V is Korean War equipment same is Gloster Meteor all the combat with other planes happened during Korean war not during WW 2.
Yeah sure just the BR V equipment in game is same as Korean War.
Only Germany used a Jet for Combat during WW 2 and there is 2 unconfirmed uses by Japan. And not to shoot some rockets just direct combat. However all allies jets in game saw service during Korean War.
Not exactly only the German one saw the British one was just finished sadly came too late to see combat against other aircrafts. Jets are associated with the Korean War more then World War 2 since literally only 1 nation deployed jets during world war 2.
And whatâs the problem using the same equipment that saw service and its not some fantasy scenario during Korean War that was actual conflict ? I mean if you dont wanna see Korean War dont play BR V allies or China easy solution really.
BR V still sees germany, condemning it to see korean war jets is too much
Yes much of the same equipment was used, but it is about this war only
Iâm not against other eras as a concept but I would say that should not be for a long long time, maybe never.
So we should only care about WW2
They are in the game already ⌠Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star and Gloster Meteor are Korean war jets.
Well I dont mind other wars close to world war 2 as long as they use the same Equipment Korean war is perfect and Second Sino-Japanese War.
for the love of god no moving past WW2, this is what destroyed WT as well for me; there are so many battlefields they still have not done or touched for WW2 so there is plenty to do for the next years to come
Well Korean war is pretty much WW 2 Soviet vs US equipment it was well implemented and liked in H & G. Iâm not even suggesting moving past WW2 its just something you already have if you donât wanna play donât play China BR IV or BR V. You are having literally the same equipment from WW2 and the focus is still WW 2. If you are playing BR V with Majority of the factions you are mostly playing some fantasy scenario since its not World War 2. Not to mention there is no Battlefield in Korea. Battle of the Bulge is the final campaign we have majority of BR V allies equipment did not participated even there.
Godspeed Emperor, your antics will be missed! 
Sorry, when I first read your post I mistook one of the added US aircraft for a Sabre. I mean, if itâs not going to interfere with WW2, then why not? Itâd also take out all of the not HA equipment from other factionsâŚ
But that bring another question: How will the old jets stack up against the MiG-15s? Are they balanced?
Well Mig Shock was what happened and Meteor is already the best jet and for first time US will have unique enemy that have stronger air force but weaker tanks. And this same aircraft had to fight Migs they have chance but yes Meteor for first time will be outmatched however it can kill a mig this aircrafts fought over Korea.
How Australian Meteors Fought MiGs in Korea - Part 1
And Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star vs Mig was the common sight at early to mid stages of Korean war.
The First Jet vs Jet Duel (That You Didnât Know About)
The entire BR IV and BR V Chinese faction is just a bonus to have realistic battle BR V and BR IV instead of some fantasy scenario so it doesnât need to have full Korean war equipment. The WW 2 Stuff used is enough for a balanced match.
The Mig is better but its worse dog fighter so yes if you go in a dogfight against a meteor you will lose.
Thank you my fried wish you good luck. Im still around simply im not that active outside specially after I start my next project xD
The M26 Pershing was ready to land on the beaches of Normandy the troops decided to leave them behind because they thought the Sherman was good enough, they were sorta wrong after a while though they were actually used quite a lot hence why a lot of them were knocked out during the war.
Yeah I wonder which factory was going to mass produce them⌠Due to the aforementioned resistance and design changes, full production of the T-26E3 (M26) only began in November 1944, with few reaching Europe by V-E Day. Even at the end of the war was not fully ready but I really donât know what you are saying since I cant hear you from the music ⌠but yeah as I WAS SAYING THEY WHERE USED MOSTLY IN KOREA :
M26 Pershing (1944)
M26 Pershing was in general a bad tank even the Sherman was better far better tank then the Pershing ever will be and the numbers prove it the best thing poor old Pershing could do is turn itself to M46 Patton so sorry Black Jack but I go with the good old:
So yeah game portrait terrible tanks like IS-3 and M26 as good or lets not start with the German WW 2 Doom turtles that to this day are over glorified and yet the moment Germany deployed them the war was lost.The Sherman and T-34 where the best tanks of WW 2 and even during Korean war Sherman tanks outclassed poor Pershing that got overrun by Chinese and such tanks where really not made for mobile war not like the Centurion that was amazing Korean War tank sadly poor Pershing was not fast enough :
The Shermans may have outclassed the Pershings but they both still out outclassed the Asian special ed and da great Chinaâs T-34-85s in every conceivable way a propaganda photo doesnât change that.
Iâm still waiting for the M4A2E8 the definitive best Sherman I will die on that hill.
I also prefer the Sherman.
Well not Korea had not enough roads for the Pershing to be effective mobility was very important in the Korean War and T-34-85 was far more mobile then the Pershing. China received IS-2 tanks but T-34 was simply better for the Korean terrain. The Pershing was designed for Europe not for Asia really for Korea was a terrible idea. People love tanks with underpowered engines but they are good only in video gamesâŚ
I prefer the chaffee
