We can consider ourselves relieved too, haha.
3 Likes
6 Likes
Were the developers aware of the long-standing issue of booster card stacking? After the previous update to the booster cards, it was explicitly stated that players could only use three booster cards at a time. If there’s any confusion, you can try clicking on a fourth booster card to see the in-game prompt. So, how many players have stacked more than three booster cards in recent months?
3 Likes
Refer to the previous responses from our CMs.
That’s all I can say.
Ah another loyal player has fallen
See ya on camels land 
3 Likes
You must make a final funeral for them
They arent Bad guys or to controversional ones compared to Mr greyparrots or dregomz so i think it’s valid for them to have a more honorable last goodbye from enlisted community
I would have hired this guys instead as alpha testers seeing how they are capable of Spotting things that devs can’t
3 Likes
From iPhone meme
Developers also need to maintain rationality and consider the feelings of the player community when dealing with player violations. After all, players can decide whether or not to spend money on your game.
No one will tolerate excessive punishment and broadly defined terms. If you insist on such terms, then let the severity of the punishment be acceptable to the majority, that’s it.
Due to your permanent ban on players during promotional periods, it’s hard for me not to worry about your reputation. Although players may oppose some of the developer’s actions, they also do not want the reputation of their games, which cost money and time, to continue to deteriorate. If the game is completely destroyed, no one will be happy.
12 Likes
Jade, you know it as much as I do.
It isn’t our game. It’s the dev’s.
I get that the punishment might not always fit the crime, but each and every one of us signed up to the rules.
Exploits and hacks and whatever that goes against the rules will always run the risk of the wrath of the devs.
Is it always fair? No.
But we signed up for those rules.
And just for the record, I never made these rules. I just moderate the forums. 
5 Likes
I didn’t attribute the reason to you, ‘you’ of course refers to the developers, I’m just pointing out their problems and expressing my concerns now.
I quite enjoy playing this game, but with its current reputation, I’m worried that it might suddenly disappear someday. 
6 Likes
I figured as much.
That said, my comment still stands.
Whether or not I agree with perma-bans for someone who exploits a silver gain, as opposed to out-right hacking the shit out of the game, rules are rules.
We all have to abide by them. After all, we agreed to the T&Cs when we started playing.
All live-service games die in the end, and I feel your pain right now, but banning people for overtly exploiting game mechanics isn’t the death-knell that you think it is.
Those people will always find other ways to compromise the integrity of the game. And it’s best that they’re removed from the game-space, in my humble opinion, of course.
Unpopular opinion, I know.
2 Likes
The behavior of these people is certainly unfair to the game, but they will not be hated by other players like cheating. The opponents here are not against punishment, they, like me, oppose “Using overly broad terms as a reason for permanent ban”. The way to satisfy people is simple:
-
Make the severity of punishment acceptable to the majority of players (recycling silver coins or even adding additional punishment).
-
Explain clearly to what extent players will be permanently banned. If developers are concerned about players obtaining silver coins through exploiting vulnerabilities, tell everyone that ‘how many silver coins obtained through vulnerabilities will be permanently banned’, rather than just using ‘exploiting vulnerabilities’ as a reason. This is the solution to completely eliminate players’ concerns.
Choosing one of them is enough.
7 Likes
If i we’re You i would have switched games alredy
Idc about Game balance as i did before at this point hell… Even thinking on it makes me wonder it was worth to think that trying to be someone who analized as many aspects as possible and put My heart on the majority of suggestions i made thinking i could make this place a more wonderful one, but now i see that i cant do anything since this decisión is up to the devs, they have 2 choices, keep silencing until the Game dies…
Or actually starting to care about us as community for once…
4 Likes
Ban does wipe silver to zero.
2 Likes
Banned for 1 year yes, permaban maybe too much. I think, you may want not to loose those players forever, but give them a chance to come back after learning their lesson.
Afterall, even casinos that ban advantaged players onsite, do it only for 1 year. You may want to consider that and change the punishment accordingly.
2 Likes
if they truly love this game, they should relive the journey of climbing back up from the bottom — progressing from BR1 to BR5 with a mindset of atonement, and purchasing both the premium squad and account. After they log in continuously for four years again and complete another 15,000 real battle matches, the developers should award them a unique small badge (for example, a cross).
2 Likes
6 Likes