“Whistle innocently while skeedadling away”
2 Likes
“That’s exactly it.Not having a BR IV lineup is actually a great advantage for Japan—you don’t have to worry about being ‘uptiered’ and can fight opponents of the same rank. Now some people are saying Japan should be given Type 4 grenade launchers and moved back to BR IV, but that would actually hurt Japan’s current advantage. Against the US, Japan would just get shredded by Calliope rockets and HVARs.”
“As for the Chi-To…Oh, my emperor, don’t be modest. Its armor is as thin as the German Panzer IV at BR 3, and its gun is only around 75 mm. Don’t compare it to the Panther—it still can’t withstand 76 mm or even high-penetration 75 mm shells. It’s basically just an oversized Panzer IV. That said, it does handle KVs pretty easily.”
Well even war thunder is missing some fun tanks that Japan had but here some tanks like this one will be nice:
In wathunder there is no need of it but here will be nice since it has coaxial machine gun.
Well not exactly BR IV actually its playable and good BR they should add it add at this point in the past I would understand but now BR IV Japan would be very nice BR to play.
3 Likes
How should I put this to you—a crime is a crime. I’m not denying what was wrong, but if you overlook the greater good because of certain wrongs, then that’s not right either. That means you’re not being neutral.
But let me ask you: what if the Soviet Union hadn’t stopped Germany? Would more civilians have been massacred? The Allies were initially hoping to see Germany and the Soviet Union weaken each other. It wasn’t until the Soviets fought their way back to Berlin on their own that the Allies panicked and rushed to seize V1 missile and jet engine technology.
Could you elaborate on the issue of bombers attacking civilians?
Oh for the love of god! I just said that!!!
Good news — I saw a gold-card semi-automatic rifle, late model, mentioned on a Russian forum. It’s said to have a full-auto mode, 20 rounds… maybe you could add it to the tech tree. That way its BR wouldn’t be weak either.
1 Like
Well I Like the equipment on BR IV Japan its much better then BR III or BR II the only playable BRs for Japan are BR IV and BR V and they dont even let us play BR IV xD
Hear me out: Soukou-Tei | War Thunder Wiki
I have plans on how this could be in game. Would you like to chat in dms @Emperor_Yoshiro
“You misunderstood.Me repeating it is a form of affirmation — double affirmation means strong affirmation, not teasing you — don’t worry. My own country has had historical conflicts with the Soviet Union as well. So we must treat different situations objectively. Did you know that the United States, in order to test the effects of firebombing on Japan, first conducted firebomb experiments on Chinese civilians?”
Its a ship how we gonna play it on map that have no water ? 
Plenty of Japanese maps have Water which plenty of them have drivable boats on them already. There’s also this much better version of it: Soukou-Tei No.4 | War Thunder Wiki
Is that really the case? Or do you think Soviet BR 3 is still too strong and Japan needs to rush open BR 4 to counter it? Because—I feel—right now BR 4 is like dead weight. If you want to play BR 4 yourself, you’ll most likely get dragged into BR 5 matches, and since you’re intentionally using BR 4 equipment, the gap compared to BR 5 is huge. My friends and I tried playing German BR 4, hoping to counter U.S. BR 3, but we ended up facing U.S. BR 5 every time and got bombed silly by rockets. You’ve got to be careful with this!
Well I dont see the problem with it they just need to give some semi auto and reduce BR on some planes and it will be OK maybe some BR III anti tank weapon for Japan and better ground attackers but we shall see what the new update brings.
Well it can be map vehicle on the maps but I dont see how we gonna put them in the TT.
Although it’s already been said, The Ho-Ni I is decent for BR2 and has a good cannon, but the one thing you need to keep in mind is that it can’t frontally penetrate M4a2s and Sherman 105s with it, otherwise I have a good time using it. The Ho-Ni III is utterly useless on BR3, since it has the same cannon as the 1st Ho Ni that can’t penetrate shermans and is on the same BR as the Chi Nu, but it would be a decent choice if it was lowered to BR2.
2 Likes
TT? No, but event that would take its own squad slot? Yes.
“What topic are you talking about? I couldn’t find it earlier.”
Manchuria has no water (for seaplanes/aquatic operations) — better to rely on land airfields.
Well depends if it come to all factions have some ships but simply there is a lot of maps without water and will be strange how this class gonna operate there should be spawning without a vehicle and also it has crew personnel of 10 xD I don’t see ships being implemented in Enlisted unless its some mod.
Actually,I don’t like how Df forces pre-set squads on us for events. If they want to restrict weapons, just restrict them directly. Our own fully upgraded weapons become useless—premium accounts, high-level squads, all wasted. Df’s balancing skills are… well, obvious to everyone. It would be better if they handled it like this marathon event, but just limit the scoring to the Soviet-Japanese battlefield.
Let naval ship cannons become a kill mechanism for black zones or a new type of artillery call-in — that would be a fresh feature (referencing Helldivers 2).
Well there is options but I really don’t think Enlisted is ready for Ships I love ships but that will be a lot of devilment time and it must be implemented only on specific maps maybe can work on specific map as a game mechanic. Just like the armor train in the past but hope its not that horrible xD