I mean realism and historical accuracy is a thing, but I´m afraid it is not followed into expected detail since we have back then already retired and obsolete PzIIIB in Moscow. Same goes for “Enlisted Veteran” posters… that is however, more minor detail.
So Enlisted devs have no idea what’s their actal goal
Do they want arcade or realistic gameplay?
it’s a way in between.
eh… i can’t say mostly which one prevail.
as we have half of the game based on arcade features, and others on realism.
hard to tell
1 Like
we’ll see
The ‘‘gun limit’’ suggestion can make the game more realistic
but that’s not going to fix the other issues…
Adding that particular Panzer III was a very deliberate nerf to the Germans. It also lengthens the grind for better tanks.
1 Like
PZ IIIB never participated in Barbarossa in the first place. It is not just nerf, it is huge historical flaw that people have been pointing out ever since the bloody alpha testing.
2 Likes
Indeed. Which is precisely how you know it is a deliberate nerf. I’m quite sure the developers have done their research, as even a cursory glance at Wikipedia would have informed them of what saw service when and where.