Fun fact: if you try to take on a panther from THE FRONT with a Stuart, you do it wrong 
Stuart is the best and funniest (light) tank of the game, it’s the mannlicher of tanks, change my mind!
1 Like
perishing fought there like a month after Normandy
proof?
please read above 1944-1950s in service
You’re funny. Adoption into service does not mean that these tanks crossed the ocean)
Here is an excerpt from wikipedia to make you understand that m26s have been in use since February 1945 (and in fact almost in March).
I personally don’t want the Tiger 2 or the Pershing.
2 Likes
yea im bummed to but it shouldn’t be our top tier tank thou
If making this game not realistic at all
Fact is though, it’s the best tank that’s historically feasible.
A Jagdtiger would be more historically accurate than a Pershing.
Ah yes, the eternal battle.
Wastedwoodsman vs everyone else
8 Likes
were not talking about that battle but Normandy they had super limited numbers of tigers mostly panthers not tigers so why you can spam a tiger i dont kno just more german bias
But admit it, it’s funny how his own sources work in favour of those who argue with him. Just like Wikipedia used above.
2 Likes
Few things
Make this an M9 against the Panzerfaust 100 and that should work
As for the Pershing issue, the precident the devs set with the Jumbo would allow for it, as "if equipment and weapons existed during the battles reflected in the game’s campaign, they have a chance to appear in the campaign itself. " (June Q&A linked below). As Pershing was adopted during Operation Overlord, it is entirely possible.
1 Like
how? not really i dont care about historical accuracy
This battle is part of the Normandy campaign. Once again I have caught you in a lie. You do not corroborate a single word.
It is absurd to compare the Tiger, which has been around since 1942, and the Pershing, which appeared near the end of the war and barely participated in the battles.
It’s like giving the Axis a Maus
1 Like
Ok. If that’s the case, we should add an IS-3 to Moscow and to counter it, give the germans a leopard.
For Normandy, I believe giving america M16s and germany G36 rifles would be a decent start.
no isn’t. giving the tiger to Germany without a counter is broken if you guys get maus i want nuke then
I do not want to look twice at the same grenade launcher of different size, I want to see Panzershek
Yes, you might think so, but we just don’t need any stronger tanks than we already have. Anything other than them would be impossible to use, as I wrote above.
2 Likes
The m4a1 76 (w) along with the tiger, if you haven’t already seen it.
I think it’s a psychological problem. I’ve been studying/working and playing other games for 2-3 months and came back to play after the update. This dude was crying 3 months ago and he’s still crying.
Literally the only one who reacts that way.
Problem with that is there is no good counter to the Panzershrek, while the M9 and the Panzerfaust 100 match each other pretty well
I’m not saying its a good or bad idea, I’m just saying its entirely possible with what the devs have said. Besides, the Ju 188 and Me 410 are in a similar state to the Pershing, both stuck on the ground in Germany during the duration of Operation Overlord although admittedly for different reasons than the Pershing.
1 Like