By who? None of the dev blogs or steams have mentioned it?
All I have seen is people claiming they have inside info.
to start pumping vehicles in we need Mobile AA and AT options.
Seen staff mention it. Did not screenshot it however.
Them saying “tiger is coming soonTM” could mean two years from now and placed at campaign level 49.
why shouldn’t we have AA tanks when there’s Aircraft? and why shouldn’t we have AT tanks when there’s tanks? i Know it 's not WT, but as you mentioned its an Combined arms Game, so what the harm with more Tank Diversity? there adding more aircraft into the game. also its a historical game so again, why not?
[quote=“41048361, post:3, topic:17142”]
maybe they’ll show up in another campaign based in the Eastern Front along with the KV’s
[quote=“41048361, post:3, topic:17142”]
Tiger 1 and tiger 2 did fight in France but not in Normandy
Well, we needed diversity, but on lower levels, filled with vehicles meant purely to infantry support. Halftracks, Stugs etc. With heavier tanks coming much later in the campaign.
But its too late for that.
… iv been throwing the GIVE US MORE VEHICLES angle at them for a while now man
like shit heres a list of pretty much all the WW2 vehicles on just the americans side… were missing a lot of stuff…
Tanks
Light tanks
- Marmon-Herrington CTLS
-
Light Tank M2
- M2A1 (10)
- M2A2 (239)
- M2A3 (72)
- M2A4 (375)
- Light Tank M3/M5 (22,743) (“General Stuart”, shortened to “Stuart” and unofficially “Honey” in British service)
- Light Tank M22 (830) (“Locust” in British service, name adopted by America)
- Light Tank M24 (4,731) (“General Chaffee” in British service, name adopted by America)
Medium tanks
- Medium Tank M3 (7,533) ( General Lee American tanks purchased by the British under lend-lease.)
- Medium Tank M4 (58,000) ( General Sherman bought by British from U.S. under lend lease)
- Medium Tank M2 (112, used for training only)
- Medium Tank M7 -prototype
Heavy tanks
- Heavy Tank M26 Pershing (1,436)
- M6 heavy tank - prototype
- M4A3E2 Sherman “Jumbo” (~290)
- T34 Heavy Tank - prototype
- T29 Heavy Tank - prototype
- T28 Super Heavy Tank a.k.a. 105 mm Gun Motor Carriage T95 (2) - prototype
- T30 Heavy Tank - prototype
- T14 Heavy Tank - prototype
- T32 heavy tank - prototype
Tank destroyers
- M3 Gun Motor Carriage
- M6 Gun Motor Carriage (5,380)
- M10 tank destroyer (6,706)
- M18 Hellcat (2,507)
- M36 tank destroyer (~1,400)
- T25 AT tank destroyer - prototype
- T40/M9 Tank Destroyer - prototype
Self-propelled artillery
- M4 Mortar Carrier 81 mm (572)
- M43 Howitzer Motor Carriage
- M7 Priest 105 mm (3,490) ( 105mm SP, Priest in British service, Priest name adopted by America)
- M8 Howitzer Motor Carriage 75 mm (1,178) ( Scott )
- M12 Gun Motor Carriage 155 mm
- M40 GMC 155 mm
- T18 Howitzer Motor Carriage - prototype
- T82 Howitzer Motor Carriage - prototype
- M21 Mortar Motor Carriage
- T30 Howitzer Motor Carriage
- T34 Calliope
- T40 Whizbang
Self-propelled anti-aircraft guns
- M13 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage
- M16 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage
- M15 Combination Gun Motor Carriage
- M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage
Armoured personnel carriers
- Half-track Personnel Carrier M3 (4,088)
- M4 Kangoroo
Armoured cars
- M2 Half Track Car (13,500)
- M3 Halftrack (20,918)
- M8 Greyhound (11,667)
- M20 Armored Utility Car (3,680)
- M9 Half Track Car (3,500)
- T17 Armored Car (250)
Artillery tractors
Amphibious
- Landing Vehicle Tracked (18,620)
- Landing Craft, Vehicle, Personnel (LCVP) or Higgins boat (20,000)
- M29 Weasel
- DUKW (21,147)
Utility vehicles
- Dodge WC series light trucks
- Harley-Davidson WLA motorcycle
- Willys MB light truck
- GMC CCKW Cargo Truck
man i wouldn’t be suprised if the nazi’s had plans to make a weapon like that…
like they did create the concept for the stealth bomber decades before it was ever built. and they were kinda in the neighbourhood of insane weapon ideas
Yasss!! just slaying everything on the server without dying YASSSS!!!
the only problem with the nazis is that they have created too many projects and too few weapons to use in the war I don’t need the gundam project if the next day you lose the war
yea but if they actually did make that friggen tank we woulda been screwed… like the main cannons on that bitch were suppose to shoot an 11 inch diameter shell it was like a battleship on land lol
the concept of it was actually sound, its basically NASA’s Crawler-transporter but with guns and armour on it lol
and even if they had completed it in 1944 things they would have done with it, they would have sent it against the Russians to slow them down for a couple of weeks at the most, or against the Americans in France to be able to push them back at least towards Paris but the story would not have changed maybe the war would last only a couple of months longer, the German army during World War 2, compared to the Russians and Americans, was not mechanized the logistics still used horses, the tanks were difficult to make and once broken could not be repaired, the aviation and navy even if they were excellent in war were penalized in favor of the production of super weapons, Germany made too many mistakes that cost it the war.
lol you forget that hitler probably would have set up camp deep in the centre of that tank… also they were planning on making the armour about as thick as a vault door on a nuclear bomb shelter. so it was capable of taking a blast to the face from nearly every weapon available in the current armament of the us military at that time lol
like it was a mobile fortress, i don’t see the nazi’s not using it as a Mobile Armoured HQ
I am more than sure that the fate of a rat would be the same as that of a mouse
(Kubinka)
they will eventually come.
panthers has been confirmed by the " forum fox " ( KeoFox himself)
as far as i know, and i tested during the alpha, King Tiger II and IS-2 were present.
( and you can look up gameplays for your self ).
well, those are presents in the file, and in a devblog, they showed STUG IV and M10s for normandy. but we don’t know where currently they are. i think under work, or perhaps cancelled for what we know.
well, i used to believe the same, but war thunder vehicles and enlisted vehicles are not the same.
like, they get tweaked. in terms of statistics, than there’s the factor of animated hatches, view ports copula, and above all, weapons ( some of them, like the mg gets cooldowns ).
there’s quite alot more than simply copy and paste war thunder vehicles.
and lastly, the problem of SPAAs, are that, for how much good they can be against airplanes, they can be nightmares for infantry. so they have to tweak those as well in order to get compromises.
but, it’s just matter of time. we will eventually receive those.
But still never against the Americans, which is the point I made.
Tiger tanks did fight against the Americans, Battle of the Bulge? Do you think that tigers only fought against British and Canadian troops? and what about in Africa, where Rommel Commanded Tiger Against the British and Americans
Since when Battle of Bulge is associated with Normandy campaign?
he made the argument that tigers never fought against American troops in France, I know the difference between D-Day and the Bulge
Yeah, he did. As an argument to why Tigers shouldn’t be introduced in current Normandy Campaign, but rather left for the future, when Ardennes might come.