My Take on The New BR/ Level Order

[CaptainSebekel]

@robihr

t50

Let’s assume +/- 1.0 Level exists and we use DF sheets:
J, Semo, J1, Puma, and the short barrel IVs.
So 50%+ of the tanks struggle to pen the T-50 (excluding the premium HEAT for the short barrels), not so sure about the Semo since this thing gets new stats every week or so.

And according to DF, the T-50 is lower than the short barrels.

In my case it would face:
J1, Puma, F1, F2 and the StuG.

Everyone/ 80% can really pen each other, not stupid pixel hunting. Sounds better than recreating a Deja Vu where 50% of Axis struggle to pen the stupid T-50 again. Sure, F1 is there but only as a starter counterpart against T-28E/ Anti-Inf with “better” frontal armor.

Sure, we can try to readjust but in the end, you have to consider A and B and AB reacts to C etc…

[robihr]

@CaptainSebekel

Everyone/ 80% can really pen each other, not stupid pixel hunting. Sounds better than recreating a Deja Vu where 50% of Axis struggle to pen the stupid T-50 again. Sure, F1 is there but only as a starter counterpart against T-28E/ Anti-Inf with “better” frontal armor.

Sure, we can try to readjust but in the end, you have to consider A and B and AB reacts to C etc…

like i said i am neutral about this. it is more of a feeling that tighter BR groupings will lead to more unbalanced matches in regards to tanks mostly in off peak hours. with wider grouping you can fine tune MM more than in tighter grouping.