Dude what?
Papashka41, Thompson and MP41(r) on BRIII.
The MKb42(H) would fit there too. It fires waaaay slower and is not as accurate, but delivers more damage.
But destroying axis tanks with german Panzerfaust 60 is okay?
You don’t know how annoying it is to fight PPSH’s, Thomspons and BARs but it is still managable even with BRII stuff like MP40s. But you are absolute right: It is annoying. I still think that the PPSH, Thompson and the MKb42 all are very solid weapons with pro’s and con’s and BRIII would just be perfect.
The PPSH got twice as much rof compared to the MKb42, but the MKb42 delivers way more damage at a firerate of aprox 500-550rpm. The Thompson is decent one with a mix of both (not the best in each categories, but a very good compromise) with solid rof and damage thanks to the .45 bullets.
In my opinion absolutely fair.
If you find it hard to play against Thompson, then maybe it’s time for you to learn to play? The axis has a huge selection of weapons, but you continue to complain.
Oh dude the velocity on the Thompson’s really is something else. Lol. You ever tried semi auto on that thing to hit a distant target? Well forget it cause it fell off to the side 30 feet from you
The USSR only has one weapon, but it even makes you cry. you know how to play, but you keep complaining. Of course, the problem is not you. Yes that’s right. only Germany should dominate.
How many people do care about unique mortar? Plus I have never said I liked that decision. I only respected it, since I really didn’t care about that mortar.
Yes, I first noticed when I made those three screenshots. Sure a bad velocity - but still this smg hits hard with its .45 when in CQB. But lets be honest - a smg is not designed for mid or long range engagements. I dont use the MP38/40s for longer engagements too and try to get closer to the enemies. Same goes to the PPSH because of weak hitting power when engaging mid or long range.
I really have no idea what your problem is. I did not open this thread, I search for good compromises and even say that in some points the MKb is better but also realize that the PPSH has its own qualities. If you did read exactly what I wrote you will realize fast that I am not complaining but COMPARE three weapons with their individual strenghts.
Take your medicine.
No one ever said that and again: If you read exatly what I wrote you’ll see that I mentioned the qualities, pro’s and con’s of every weapon and even admire the PPSHs brutal firepower in CQB. To put the MKb in BRIII is just a SUGGESTION and will not lead to german/axis dominance! PPSH is twice as fast, twice as accurate and theoretical delivers more damage per second (500rpm and 8.0dmg VS. 1000rpm and 5.5dmg).
American BR2 premium tommy hits so hard with such insane rof that it beats BR5 Mkb42, there was a problem in the past due awful sights but now they are fixed and i feel dirty just by using that gun. It’s even more op than pps-42. As usual muzzle velocity is the problem but as long as you get closer then it’s fine.
You should be using enlisted resource since in game stats are lying a lot of the time.
