Moscow players! How do you want the tank game to go further on ad new levels will be added? (Hopefully in 3 weeks)

Suggestions
21

That would be nice. But i dont know about that. I think it saw combat at the end of 1942?

22

yes it is true but we should apply this rule also with the jumbo or mkb42h a bit of flexibility does not hurt, when it does not create powercreep

2 Likes
23

Su-76 would be nice too

2 Likes
24

If they do split it off into larger front campaigns, Moscow would probably be ā€œEastern Front 1941-1943ā€ while Battle of Berlin would be ā€œEastern Front 1944-1945ā€. Thatā€™s when the Soviets ended up pushing out of Russian lands into enemy lands, so that would probably be the best turning year.

4 Likes
25

stug vs su76? the idea teases me a lot, nice idea

4 Likes
26

The devs have already stated their intention to take that approach equipment-wise.

No word on if maps will be the same, but it wouldnā€™t be fer fetched

27

Stalingrad!!! Urraaaa!

1 Like
28

Bis zur Letzten Patrrrroooone wird zurĆ¼ck geschossen :pirate_flag:

1 Like
29

Maybe they gonna add them into Stalingrad.
I mean iirc the devs said no to KVs in Moscow.

1 Like
30

My feedback says that we shouldnā€™t increase disbalance and make starter tanks useless. This armory race sucks at all as we get packs of useless guns and vehicles which could make gameplay more different. Iā€™d agree on t-34 (40) with his weak turret and stug 3 with HEAT as a exception but kv and pz f2 are too overpowered for tanks and still too useless for fighting with infantry

3 Likes
31

I donā€™t think the addition of tanks to Moscow is a good idea with how AT guns work nowadays.

The germans couldnā€™t get anything historical beyond a Stug-3, which due to powercreeping would be a worse/turretless Pz.4 E, just like the LT-35 would be a worse LT-38 (Panzer 38 ingame).
Hungarians had tanks comparable to Pz 2 or early Pz 3, Slovaks had early Pz 3 equivalent, Italians had armored cars and something like a Pz 2, Romania is similarā€¦

The soviets could get T-34s or KV-1s which did exist then, but Iā€™m not sure I want to hear the complaints about 76mm guns tearing apart axis players.

The PTRS-41 is already a stretch to have in ā€œMoscowā€, although I guess it makes sense for balance since tanks seem to brush off the PTRD shots until a number of them accumulate (slow process).

The engineerā€™s AT guns seem like a joke, to be honest. In theory, the soviet one at least, it can penetrate every tank from most angles, and thereā€™s some spots to kill tanks: engine, ammo.
In practice, it seems like waiting half a minute for the engine to explode is not practical, and that ammo can only be hit from the sides on most tanks, only in very specific points.
And that on the Pz.4 E, several shots are required to explode the ammo because of the distribution of the ammunition casuses that less shrapnel hits them directly.

32

I want both of them! Itā€™s best not to miss a vehicle

I think they can add all of those tanks in to the game, But first of all, we need some thing like this