with Stalingrad I was first disappointed because of many reasons including immense grind, with boring gameplay pattern of enlisted,repeat gear and many more but the new features got me interested but the new system is really a burden for f2p players as they have to grind another whole campaign while only the present 4 campaigns are a pain in the ass to finish for free and irregular players…the new system will give everything to the buyers very quickly while f2p and irregular players who are still unable to finish even one campaign will struggle more with another campaign with full campaign grind .the new system is better than the old one but if you give the buyers 4 times xp,give the f2p players at least 2x or 1.5x more xp.f2p players are already unable to unlock anything or finish a campaign due to immense grind and since the gameplay is also very repetitive which gets very boring so please think about these kind of players as they may leave this game already and with the crumbling playerbase it will result in more loss as players are also needed
If you play for the gear grind I think you will always be disappointed be it now with slow unlocks or even when you are done and there is nothing left to grind.
I have no interest in Stalingrad so I wont be buying into it BUT I do like the concept. Those who are interested can pay for a better experience and those of us who dont can just grind as normal. I dont think this new method makes F2P suffer more but I think it does help alot of people who like certain campaigns have a better time.
I think give f2p player ability to skip locked level will be enough.
Or, suport the devs
Well, if you are only going to concentrate on unlocking all the levels, you are simply going to get stressed, play the campaign that you like the most and play with the faction that you like the most, the developers do not force you to upload everything to the maximum, also if I do not remember bad xeofox said that the weapons that we already have repeated in other campaigns, we can unlock them a little faster, to avoid the repetitive routine, but that will be tested in staligrando, anyway, just PLAY FOR FUN, if you get stressed generating a routine is your PROBLEM not of the game.
We talk about 30 Euro, Or?
I dont play STALiNGRAD but i want that 2 Pre Order Tanks.
If you dont can invest that Little ask your Parents
Stalingrad campaign is the place for traditional players. And they are testing to get rid of F2P +P2W game style.
Well… 30$ is really cheap for what is offered compared to what’s in other campaigns. As for ftp players having a harder time grinding… If ftp players had it as easily as those who pay, why paying at all in the first place 🤷
30 is a good investment for this and I see no reason why people would complain about it.
but here nobody can wait for them to show us those “some” locked levels to point the finger, obviously not!
the fact remains that the game has never been for non-paying players, the minimum you have to spend is 10 euros to buy the battlepass and get the necessary resources to complete the game, so I only have a laugh when I read certain topics, here no one forces you to spend or play, and if you pay or not the game don’t change, maybe stalingrad will have some squad / weapon blocked so what? these would have been monetized in any case and instead of 60 euros each you have to pay 30 for all, you don’t want to pay well, we will use the free weapons as usual, which as usual are always the same is a problem for you? If the answer is yes then tell me games on ww2 that make you use different weapons than those in enlisted, do not force yourself, they are always those in every game.
Have u ever play warthunder? 
It does combined with the lack of matchmaking, you’ll have low level f2p players up against maxxed out players in a couple of days on a brand new campaign. No one would care about that fast leveling up system if matchmaking was a thing.
The fact of the matter is that 30 dollars/EU is a fair price imo. Think about how much SINGULAR SQUADS cost in campaigns. Some mediocre planes for over 50 USD. 30 for the whole package is more than fair in comparison, since the devs need to make SOME kind of profit. The act of developing a game itself costs money, and they can’t just service everything for free. I do think that f2p players make up the strong backbone of the community, and i hope that the maps at least bring new people in who don’t want to pay.