I have no idea what you are talking about.
It’s not weak. It’s just not BR4 strong.
You have no clue about this gun, do you? Otherwise you wouldn’t write this.
Again, it’s not about the gun being weak. It’s still a good gun.
Problem is, there are better ones on lower BR.
Like PPS may be a good SMG but it’s not BR5 meterial.
it’s not a problem, it’s a solution)
Ых
I don’t set out to convince you, everyone speaks out here, as long as there is such a thing.
the opinion of three cripples
Like my 4 crippled ones, he’s very good)))
He’s great, you’re the problem. 
So better gun being one BR lower is not a problem? That’s a novelty.
Sorry but I don’t understand those two.
Meh, MG34 is better imo.
MG42 has nothing to it except for better sights and marginally better recoil.
It’s good already)
Nothing will come of our conversation. 
I don’t say it’s bad. Start reading instead or writing.
Move to BR3 and buff it.
Increase firing rate=weaken, do you think this is MG81? This is the funniest joke I have ever heard this year.
I know some sad German main players lack skills, to the point where a firing rate of 900 can make them start complaining.
So I have put forward better suggestions for you:
Enabling MG42 to have a firing rate of 700 would make it stronger than MG34 and more suitable for staying in BR4.
As I’ve said, soviet-focussed mind struggles to understand the concept of more rof = waste of bullets. Especially on guns with not so large magazines/belts.
But I guess 0.05s faster time to down is some amazing advantage worth shooting 3 out of 50 bullets into the air. Maybe if you are good/very good player and can control your bursts very well this can be advantageous, but not for average enlisted player.
No more RoF increases plss im tired of this unusable rof shit, decrease dispersion, reload time, anything but rof increases.
No no no!
Commieboos say the ppsh41 (now br5) is weaker than beretta m38 20 rounds (now br1) because it shoots too fast and waste ammunition while being slow to reload!
Get your facts right mister! Soviets suffer and cannot compete!
Just take MG34 if you can cope with it’s sights. I really don’t see why ppl hang to MG42 so much, it’s mediocre for this BR.
(It “brrrrrr”)
It doesn’t even do that. Sorry but castrated legend is not a legend but it’s shadow.
Bigotte’s sound mod makes it sound cool but it’s like covering the rust with a new layer of paint.
Well I do use a sound mod.
With it it sounds great…
I do like the mg45 squad a lot however. Shoots truly fast, even if it has a mere 50 rnds belt box (but reloads fast because all soldiers from the squad are on Pervitin)
Does help that they have more reserve ammunition 
Well, I don’t see any other reason to use MG42 over MG34.
It is overall a better gun, higher RoF, yet usable unlike the mg 15 or 81 and I am unsure if it is a thing but I feel that the mg 42 has less dispersion than the mg 34, the RoF is good enough to do head ons against thompsons, or ppsh and come on top, not even mentioning the mg 42 with 100 round belt which solves the issue with the mag version, also it has a bit less horizontal recoil and last but not least important, it is a prettier gun.
theres very little you can do with “skill” against random dispersion.
No matter how skilled you are you cant control the random dispersion.
well, yes and no.
Germut LMGS ? Well the recoil & dispersion does play quite massive part here.
But you got to understand that, sovjets that apparently are completely clueless what dispersion is due to sovjet guns lacking it.
for someone who is throwing skill issue everywhere, i havent seen any evidence of you having the skill to handle it either…
I think MG42 enters the “too much rof” territory. But I guess it’s still a personal prefference as it’s not that high.
MG34 - 0.40
MG42 - 0.41
I guess you are just more comfortable with sights.
But 0.8s longer reload. Imo not worth it but I guess personal prefference.
That’s a tough one. I like both 
Both hot, that is true, but I rather the sound of the mg 42 over the one of the mg 34
I just realized, I dont play much br III tbh but yes it seems like the worst deal ever made for me now that I look at it closely.
Yet I am not 100% sure if it is, I remember when I used to play these mgs I usually had a harder time with the mg 34 specially against the soviets, the mg 42 was the safe bet, yes I do remember the reload being awful but still does not matter if you die because you wont be able to reload anyway.