It’s not like they can’t have two versions of MG42 one with heavy bolt (900rpm) and another with light bolt (1200rpm). Both should be at BR3.

It’s not like they can’t have two versions of MG42 one with heavy bolt (900rpm) and another with light bolt (1200rpm). Both should be at BR3.

Same, MG42 is kinda buns in my opinion, BR5 version is good tho
Well, that’s nonsense. Are you suggesting that Madsen compete with MG42? Well, let’s say they move MG42. Then you’ll win by writing a thread about “Everyone forgot about MG34, move it to BR2”? Maybe give the Germans a G36c, a captured Javelin, an ATGM, and a “win” button?
i hope so, i would really like to play with the mg42 early en moscow, i use the mg42 because it is cool but always i use it in br V because it is my only option
I really want mg-34/100…
And about mg-42 for 3 br
Honestly, due to its accuracy and stability, it deserves its 4 br
I do not know the best machine gun of this game.
it is possible to reduce the br, machine guns have more disadvantages than advantages
It’s just that everyone forgets about the Johnson machine gun, which generally has 20 rounds and is at 4 br.
And the allies already have the T-24)
which is a terrible copy
The early MG-42 is a sniper machine gun…
He’s going to be sooo strong.
It needs to be improved wisely, not lowered
As well mg -45
They are not competitive with 50 rounds on 5 br
My suggestion is to add 100 rounds of tape and also leave for 4 br These two machine guns are essentially the best in the game… they lack ammunition.
What accuracy? It has the worst dispersion compared to all TT BR3 and BR4 MGs.
I agree it has good stability but it pays for it with the longest reload and the biggest movement dispersion compared to all TT BR3 MGs. So I don’t think it superior overall.
How bad everything is with you…
You’re making a big deal out of a molehill
Weapons in our game can’t have only advantages.
In two years, what you described has not affected my game at all.
So this is a claim for the sake of a claim.
(this problem is just negligible)
I remember being very sad when the mg-42 was taken from the troops and the mg-15 was given…
I loved this machine gun
And I’m glad that he got a 100 ribbon for the top shooting range, which is my 100% choice.
If you have problems with hitting, then I advise you to raise your game skills and review the perks of the fighters.
Because I have no problem playing effectively.
Even if you can’t sleep knowing that he’s weak, please suggest making him better but without the translation to br below It looks duplicitous.
But so far, no worthwhile proposals have been received specifically for TT mg 42.
Small Ammunition?
Let’s give a 75-round belt and increase mobility. this will reduce the recharge slightly.
Reducing br is the way of the weak
if I’m not experiencing difficulties, then neither are you)
I have no idea what you are talking about.
It’s not weak. It’s just not BR4 strong.
You have no clue about this gun, do you? Otherwise you wouldn’t write this.
Again, it’s not about the gun being weak. It’s still a good gun.
Problem is, there are better ones on lower BR.
Like PPS may be a good SMG but it’s not BR5 meterial.
it’s not a problem, it’s a solution)
Ых
I don’t set out to convince you, everyone speaks out here, as long as there is such a thing.
the opinion of three cripples
Like my 4 crippled ones, he’s very good)))
He’s great, you’re the problem. ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So better gun being one BR lower is not a problem? That’s a novelty.
Sorry but I don’t understand those two.
Meh, MG34 is better imo.
MG42 has nothing to it except for better sights and marginally better recoil.
It’s good already)
Nothing will come of our conversation. ![]()
![]()
I don’t say it’s bad. Start reading instead or writing.
Move to BR3 and buff it.
Increase firing rate=weaken, do you think this is MG81? This is the funniest joke I have ever heard this year.
![]()
I know some sad German main players lack skills, to the point where a firing rate of 900 can make them start complaining.
So I have put forward better suggestions for you:
Enabling MG42 to have a firing rate of 700 would make it stronger than MG34 and more suitable for staying in BR4. ![]()
As I’ve said, soviet-focussed mind struggles to understand the concept of more rof = waste of bullets. Especially on guns with not so large magazines/belts.
But I guess 0.05s faster time to down is some amazing advantage worth shooting 3 out of 50 bullets into the air. Maybe if you are good/very good player and can control your bursts very well this can be advantageous, but not for average enlisted player.
No more RoF increases plss im tired of this unusable rof shit, decrease dispersion, reload time, anything but rof increases.
No no no!
Commieboos say the ppsh41 (now br5) is weaker than beretta m38 20 rounds (now br1) because it shoots too fast and waste ammunition while being slow to reload!
Get your facts right mister! Soviets suffer and cannot compete!
![]()
Just take MG34 if you can cope with it’s sights. I really don’t see why ppl hang to MG42 so much, it’s mediocre for this BR.
(It “brrrrrr”)