Keofox has to say this at least once a month otherwise forum copium will eventually run out.
3 Likes
This got a little better,and is easier to trigger now
1 Like
translation software
1 Like
Basically no one will use it then. Basically no one want a td with inferior gun and armor.
It’s hardily inferior, that gun could Easly kill basically every American and British tank at most normal combat ranges.
The game consistently adds kit though to campaigns that was never there irl, latest addition to the game like the G.55 and the PIV L70 are further examples of kit that never saw service in those campaigns.
The same gun that I can get on the pz4j that is a 15 level unlock.
For me it is ok to add things that is not there but exist if there is no good alternative.
Also can you ensure all the gun are really beeing used in those campaign?
At least half of the Infantry weapons in most campaigns were never really used, they are prototypes or limited run weapons that never saw any action.
The issue I really have apart from the very unhistorical nature of including weapons systems that were not really in any one specific campaign is that you run into the problem of the campaigns blending into one another , that the kit is more or less the same, Normandy is a mess imo with a lot tanks that should not be there at all, this inclusion of late war tanks makes a late r were campaign like for example Nordwind meaningless as all those tanks are in Normandy.
They could off added a Jadgpanther for Normandy if they wanted a Big gunned TD for the Germans that is appropriate
I don’t care how many levels they are going to add to the campaigns. At one point there is literally no other possibilities to add. Maps need to be added.
The only issue I have is that the devs are adding tons of premiums with the fun stuff instead of adding them to the progression line. I wouldn’t even care if a squad gets just a slight modification of a weapon already existing but as a foreign squad. Assaulter IV as another nation for axis Normandy or something like that.
I would like to see whole outfits buyable for all squads (at least in one campaign). I don’t care if the outfit will cost 5-15 bucks but let me use it where I want, not just the soldier itself.
I don’t understand the current state of business of darkflow (or Gaijin).
I would spend more money if it would be reasonable and understandable.
My comment doesn’t do justice of the current issue with diversity. I hope you understand what I mean.
3 Likes
Keofox says 8 words and its full hopeium? I dont buy it. Im very glad they said something, but what about explosive spam, bombing runs, premium squads, bracing, plane cycling, grey zone tanking, and everything else? None of these are new problems, and yet theres been zero talk about them in a year. They say theyre listening and that they gather feedback, and yet none of these issues are solved or acknowledged.
9 Likes
It is definitely not. Or let me say that I don’t buy it. It is like a politician speaking out of the blue.
Game has some issues to address and they are well known. But for the moment the update was or is ok. Engineers being added to machine gun premium squads is just a hint that it’s possible to add engineers to older squads. Bombing runs are easily destroyable now giving attacker planes (specially in Tunisia) another purpose.
1 Like
have you shot down bombing runs in the current patch? They “made them easier to kill” before and it didnt do much. I havent tested yet so I dont know
Cannon now work so you can shoot down bomber
Still
One dude cant kill all of them and avoid the bombing run
1 Like
they just need to make it into the same thing Smoke is. Player determines path, one bomber swoops in and does a run along the path, and then flies off.
Less bombs, more skill, easier to counter with an active fighter plane.
I think part of this issue all feeds into if they increase team size in the future, which means more vehicles and planes.
Probably
Yes I did.
And it is definitely easier at a point that you can stop it. Ain’t a joke. I am conservative at this point but am surprised that you can stop it easily.
Either with an AA or with an attacker plane.
1 Like
Oho…sounds more or less like a random reply of a dev here.
As Wotan said, nothing touched core problems…and I really come more and more to the conclusion that I am wasting time here and also playing the game.
Yesterday evening was just a fckn spamfest. Idiot bots still running around like on crack, stuck in obstacles, looking everywhere else but not at enemies and if they do by accident, they literally do nothing. Small MG-nests bugged…ah, fck it, it’s a waste of time to sum the errors up again and again…
1 Like
Right.
As for me and the current state, I wouldn’t spend a SINGLE cent into this game.
Why? Because its core idea of using squads isn’t working at all.
If the devs can prove that they are capable of coding a state of the art AI, I’d start with spending.
Everything else appears absurd to me and I still struggle to comprehend how people leave tons of money in non-working squads. Plain insanity.
Oh, and IF squads would work properly, I wouldn’t even bother if they would be historically inacurate. I also don’t get these complains of the p(l)aying community, including questions about cosmetics.
Okay, maybe it’s just the most simplistic idea of “Better to have a good looking idiot squad than a bad looking”…well…
1 Like