This change is completely lovely. If the BR II plane data for the US is equal to the BR IV data for japan, then new players in the Japan camp will be slaughtered by the USAF’s super rocket attacker right from the start of the game.
Well spotted, sir.
I believe the BR has been changed from 5 to 4.
In the Reinforcements received topic, when the original schedule was first posted, it said BR 5.
I used that schedule to add the dates of the event, I added that schedule to the topic.
Now I see that the original schedule I had used, no longer says BR 5 but 4.
Since you also see BR 4 in game, probably the BR has been lowered without announcement (yet).
you did watch the video right…
same goes for 50kg bombs, soviet rockets and 20/23/37/45mm cannons (Soviet AP rounds are the best in game currently)
Show us. I want to see you make multiple runs, killing off both tanks and a heap of infantry with a “single Rocket and 30mms” (in one pass)…dont take too long now ![]()
vehicles are instant ticket deficit. you have to kill a shit ton of infantry to make up the same in tickets
“consistency”…not just stars align

That doesn’t change the fact that you can’t read.
Eagerly waiting for changes based on WW2 historical data regarding Fedorov 25, Fedorov 1912, Uragan, T20, Hyde, Rocket Pershing, HoRi, ChiRi 2, Autohei, AS, AF, RD and especially Su-9 1946 ![]()
Let’s play a game called “Help Darkjin make a WW2 game”:
Question 1.
Which nation in a WW2 game should have access to Tiger tank, PAK 43 cannon, Ofenrohr and MP-28?
The talking parts over. We are at the “showing” of Bf110 G2…specifically taking out multiple tanks plus infantry in one pass…to show that its at least equal to the IL 2s capability… justify its higher BR.
is it destructive??? yeah…is it easier to farm infantry with…yeah it can be…Does it bring more potential destruction to the team than an IL 2??..no…not really
Bf 110 G2 as with t-34-85 and perhaps the BR3 p38 should be downtiered purely because of player incompetence.
I will die on this hill… i can pick out BRIV trash in my 5 games every single time and they are always wasting the slot.
Support the idea of a BR6 purely for this.
The only people that can take tanks out with it are dedicated users that have learnt the pattern… also the 30 mils reward knowing where the enemy is.
Granted you can just spray the objective and get kills but you have to learn the drop and also its near impossible to take out planes that aren’t unaware unless you are just good.
It is a vehicle that rewards skill… why it is in the same bracket as A20 and JU188 (it is BRIV aircraft idc) is beyond me.
That sounds pretty like pretty much the same thing. If you didn’t like the type 99 and preferred the type 96 then you didn’t have to use type 99, the Devs didn’t have to make them identical therefore ruining the type 99.
We only have pak 40. Pak 43 is the 88 variant that doesnt exist in enlisted outside of jagdpanther
Well I haven’t played high BR Japan in about a year so I will trust you on that.
Let’s call it the “temporary but permanent German AT gun” of Japan.
They should honestly just add type 92 100mm cannon for japan. Germany could get pak 43 since pak 40 feels very weak in br 5
Oh no, they absolutely do, the Chi Ha is an extremely powerful BR1 tank, I use it in BR3 still.
The issue is that for the single most produced Japanese tank of the war, its paywalled for a particularly dumb reason that no one knows.
Holy argument in bad faith batman, like ffs its in the video, so many of those passes had the tanks he killed a post code away. Your just straight up lying here.
They should add many things, THINGS THAT ARE REALLY NOT THAT HARD TO ADD EITHER, but here we are, not even getting the scraps.
In a hypothetical Enlisted where the devs are actually passionate about WW2, we would get specific AT cannons for each BR bracket.
Something like this, for reference:
| BR Range | USSR | Germany | Italy | USA | UK | Japan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR 1–2 | 45mm M1937 (53-K) | 37mm Pak 36 | 47/32mm Cannone da 47/32 | 37mm Gun M1 | 2-pounder Mk I | Type 94 37mm |
| BR 2–3 | 57mm ZiS-2 | 50mm Pak 38 | 65/17 mm Cannone da 65/17 | 37mm Gun M3 | 2-pounder Mk IX | Type 1 47mm |
| BR 3–4 | 76.2mm ZiS-3 | 75mm Pak 40 | 75/46mm Cannone da 75/46 | 57mm M1 AT Gun | 6-pounder QF Mk II | Type 90 75mm Field Gun |
| BR 4–5 | 100mm BS-3 | 88mm Pak 43/41 | 90/53mm Cannone da 90/53 | 76mm M1A1 AT Gun | 17-pounder QF | Type 91 105mm Howitzer |
Nope. @VivaldiX96 ,You shouldn’t blindly believe everything you read on Wikipedia; after all, it’s written by people, and people can make mistakes.
Just wondering where the Wiki figure came from, because that is very radically different.
Japanese – Page 2 – Catalog of Enemy Ordnance
To save you the bother of clicking the link
Coming from this website
![]()

These figures taken from:
![]()
Of the:

Certainly wish I could understand kanji so I could actually read the image you shared as well.
When noobs argue against war thunder “gods of war”.
Cracks me up everytime ![]()
Be gentle with him, Myr. Poor lad has no idea what he’s saying.

