M26e5

Suggestions Vehicles
161

yes admittedly i believe i was thinking of the regular pershing.

162

bangs drum because germany still has the best tanks
the sp is better then what the us had but not as good as the ferdinand or k2h
wow the us/uk allies can fly the TU2 wow what update was that

163

and the regular pershing cant front pen the k2h thats why the sp was added

1 Like
164

i listed its advantage and you want to pick at something like that. it has a steady rof and better elevation…

Furthermore again, it can pen the front of tiger 2 which was the goal.

So per asymmetrical balance now germany needs a fighter/bomber with ridiculous payload like p-47… it can be better and that’s BRV… because once again i remind you of TU2, its front cannons are a MASSIVE advantage.

Whatever there is no reason in arguing and now i’m taking it off topic… i digress

1 Like
165

again The TU2 is ussr what does that have to do with the US/UK allies
the sp has 100mm of armor at best outside the turret shield meaning
br3 and br4 axis tanks can pen it
the kt2 can only be penned by the sp
the ferdidnand can only be penned by the sp
the us has not caught up to the axis
the axis needs better planes
that are worse than the f9 or p47
when the us gets something like the 26e5
then the axis gets the f9

again a hundred times the sp is not equal to the ferdinand or k2h

so what br4 us tank can front pen the ferdinand because as i have been told br4 is always uptiered to br5

166

it’s proving your asymmetrical fantasy land doesn’t exist.

If tu2 can be a counter to JU188 and be better then that means germany can get a p-47 counter that’s better. simple.

Because US had a fighter bomber basically as their attacker 3, yet they got a medium bomber that can be used ON TOP of the p-47… so also by that logic it means that germany can get a fighter bomber along side its medium bomber.

Really what the first part means is reinforcing your belief that US NEEDS the best planes. You have said that. The P-47 is better than the ju188, god forbid we tip the scales for once since the damn vehicles were released in germanys favor… it’s about time.

Also if the super pershing wasn’t an effective counter i wonder why the only person actively arguing against it that i’ve seen is you… simply can front pen the 2H, that’s what it was added for. so the balance was set.

2 Likes
167

Ok it gets a plane better then the p47 that can only be used against the ussr not the us uk
The sp can front pen the k2h
And the panther can front pen the Pershing and super Pershing does that mean they belong at br4
I never said it wasn’t a counter I said it’s not as good
The sp can beat the k2h
But the sp driver has to be no as good but better then the k2h

Again the axis needs a better attacker
But a. Attacker that is not as good or better than thecp44 but just a little wose
The us will have an equal tank when the 26e5 is added

The sp can front pen the kh2
The kh2 can pen everything but the shield of the sp
The sp can do the same only with a gun that reloads in glacial time

And again the tu2 is a Soviet plane wtf does that have to do with the us uk
Ask them to remove it if you thinks it’s so unfair
Don’t ask to destroy the allied axis balance because the ussr got a broken toy

I’d rather have a gun that can only front pen the hull of the kh2 like the kh2 can do to the sp
But in turn get decent armor and a cannon that has a reasonable rof

168

But it can destroy and withstand the 88 Kwk43 of the Tiger 2H

It isn’t

The F-9 is no better than the P-47, even if it burns you up.

The Meteor and P-80 were not needed by the Allies, unlike Germany with the Me 262.

Okay, Germany loses F-9s. But you lose T-20s, Hydes, Ofenrohrs, Meteors, P-80s, Pershings, Pershings with M8 rockets, and Super Pershings,Jumbo of 75 and 76 . And Germany retains its REAL weaponry And his Me 262

It’s your country’s fault, not Germany’s. They’ve already been given good tanks, but they keep complaining.

They did so, or came close, with Ofenrohr, Pershing, Pershing M8, Super Pershing and 76mm Jumbo.

APCR with 367mm Penetration If you can’t do that, it shows your lack of skill in playing and aiming at the vulnerable parts of the enemy tank.

An E-75 will be the appropriate rival for your prototype.

*only against the Allies,

169

Is this just a bit, like hyperbole to make your point, or do you unironically think that these changes would make things balanced.

1 Like
170

A total of 254 M4A3E2 “Jumbo” Sherman assault tanks were manufactured. Produced by the Fisher Tank Arsenal between May and July 1944, these heavily armored tanks represented less than 1% of total Sherman production. They were designed for assault, featuring 102mm thick front armor, and while only 8 are known to remain worldwide, Cobra King is the most famous survivor.
The Armaguerra Model 1939 was an Italian semi-automatic rifle designed by Gino Revelli. Although it was formally adopted by the Italian military, it was never mass-produced due to various factors, including the outbreak of World War II. The model was intended to use the 7.35x51mm cartridge but was adapted to the 6.5x52mm Carcano round due to production constraints. A total of 10,000 rifles were ordered, but only about 100-200 were actually produced before the project was canceled.
4,000

By the end of World War II, over 4,000 Gloster Meteor aircraft were produced during a twelve-year manufacturing period. The Meteor was the only Allied jet aircraft to see combat during the war, and it was used extensively in various conflicts following the war. 2,000 M26 Pershing tanks

By the end of World War II, a total of 2,000 M26 Pershing tanks were produced ,

Approximately 500 units of the Czechoslovakian ZH29 semi-automatic rifle were produced. While sometimes mistakenly referred to in connection with larger numbers, production was limited, with recorded contracts including 210 imported by China in 1930-31 and 100 ZH-32 variants for Ethiopia, among other small orders.

Total production of the Beretta Model 1918 automatic carbine is estimated to be between 3,500 and 5,000 units. While a 10,000-unit order was planned, only about 5,000 were delivered before the contract was cancelled in 1920

Approximately 500 units of the OVP 1918 (Officine di Villar Perosa) submachine gun were produced, with production starting around 1919 and lasting until approximately 1930. These Italian weapons were primarily designed for the Aviation Corps as a personal defense weapon.

Approximately 5,000 to 7,000 units of the FG 42 (Fallschirmjägergewehr 42) were manufactured during World War II, with Krieghoff initially producing around 2,000 of the early type, and total production reaching up to 7,000. These rare German paratrooper rifles saw limited, specialized use and were largely destroyed after the war.

Approximately 9,225 or more SIG KE7 light machine guns were produced in total, with the vast majority destined for use by Chinese forces during the Second Sino-Japanese War (part of WWII

The FNAB-43 is an Italian designed and developed submachine gun manufactured from 1943 to 1945. The first prototype was built in 1942 and the ~1,000 built by the FNA-B according to Ian McCollum of Forgotten Weapons (Fabbrica Nazionale d’Armi di Brescia, “Brescia National Arms Factory”, hence the name) were issued to German and Italian RSI (Repubblica Sociale Italiana) units fighting in Northern Italy.

278

By the end of World War II, a total of 278 Panzer IV/70 (A) and about 950 Panzer IV/70 (V) were produced during the war.

91 units

By the end of World War II, a total of 91 units of the Ferdinand tank destroyer were produced. These units were built in 1943, and they saw combat during the Battle of Kursk in 1943.

The Potez 633 was a light bomber version of the Potez 63 twin-engine design. Although it was initially ordered in large numbers for the Armée de l’Air, these orders were soon cancelled, and only those aircraft ordered for export were built. In total, 74 Potez 633 were built after the prototype made its first flight on January 16, 1937.

25

By the end of World War II, approximately 25 Henschel Hs 129 B-3 aircraft were produced . This variant was developed from the Hs 129 B-2/R4 and was equipped with a 75 mm BK 7,5 gun, which was a modification of the PaK 40. The production of the Hs 129 B-3 ceased in September 1944, coinciding with the declining military position of Nazi Germany.

The Panzer III Ausf.B was produced by Daimler-Benz, with a total of 15 chassis and superstructures ordered by the end of 1937. However, only 10 fully operational tanks were actually assembled due to various reasons, including the use of some parts for other purposes.

sd kdf 234/ 2 puma 101

The Dora-Nine was produced in good numbers, but Nazi Germany was falling apart by that time; there were few pilots, there was little fuel. Many of the Fw 190D-9s built never saw combat, and in any case they were too few to have any influence on the course of the war. Those that did see action were often used as “top cover” for airfields operating the Messerschmitt Me 262 jet fighter, whose poor acceleration made it highly vulnerable during landings.

171

According to him, the F-9 will give Germany total air supremacy, even with the weak armament of the P-47 against the maximum armament of an F-9. The German fighter jet is poor in firepower compared to its counterpart.

AND?They are still fewer than the Panther

These are the figures valid until the end of the war in Europe, and much of the weaponry you mention saw combat, and in greater quantities than your prototypes or later weapons. Like it or not

2 Likes
172

In the past, the era of 75Jumbo vs. Number 4H has come to an end.
There is no longer a need for a new 90Jumbo (t26e5). You need to hide your vehicle-mounted machine gun.
Because you need to consider that during World War II, Germany had more highly-advanced tanks to deal with any opponent.
Do you really want Germany to become stronger?

173

Right… so you want to tell me that WW2 lasted for 12 entire years or what?
Did you even proof read whatever nonsence the AI halucinated for you?

So are any other of your numbers equally ficticious aswell?
Because atm it doesnt look good for your argument…

174

~2 years murrica havent received anything else than massive buffs.
This snowflake still has audacity to ask even more.

Id suggest to just ignore him, apparently there was a reason why ive had already ignored him but it had expired.

2 Likes
175

which is why i am say neither of them belong in the tech tree
sorry but of those 500 zh29 how many did germany use
25 planes
92 tanks
i am not saying the prototypes belong in the game
i am saying neither belong in the tech tree
you are setting the bar just high enough to not include the allied weapons but so low it becomes a joke
you are a joke if youre going to demand standard’s they have to be reasonable. i never said the prototypes should be in the tech tree i am saying so long as these weapons are in the tech tree there is no bar

176

you are a joke a joke if this is youre standard for tech tree you are not even a funny joke

177

Gloster Meteor aircraft production in 1944

In 1944, the Gloster Meteor production began with the first batch of 20 aircraft delivered to the RAF on June 1, 1944. These Meteors were assigned to No. 616 Squadron, which had been a Spitfire unit based at RAF Culmhead. The squadron’s first operational jet fighter squadron, No. 616, was qualified on July 27, 1944, by downing 14 V-1 flying bombs. The Meteor’s first major production version, the Meteor F.3, was introduced in 1945, featuring improved speed and better pilot visibility. The Meteor F.4, powered by two Rolls-Royce Derwent 5 engines, was introduced in 1946 and saw further enhancements in powerplant, airframe, and cockpit pressurization. The Meteor F.4 was widely exported and became the RAF’s primary fighter.

12 months starting in 1944 not 1945

178

So I assume that is supposed to be aimed at me but so far it doesnt change the fact that the 4000 produced is factually just wrong unless you REALLY count the 12 year periode including the post war and not the WW 2 timeline…

So if you only count the meteors until the F4 version that came out 1946 (so even including some post war production in late 1945) you only get 230 ish which is nowhere near your stated number.

179

ok i was wrong i was trying to make a point and made a fatal flaw, i relied entirely on ai. my point is you either let everything in for balance or set a reasonable standard.

180

I don’t know, but the Gewehr 43 is more commonly used.

When the numbers are in your favor, you like to talk about whether the weapon is valid or not. But when it’s not, then there’s no logic anymore.,You only seek the benefit of your allies

The same can be said of 0 T20 in WW2, which you constantly defend in every post related to Germany. And that same HS 129 did more kills than your tanks.

Good words, and you demonstrate it even more when Germany asks for counterparts for enemy fighter jets, but according to you, it can’t.