Technically so would the kirally and zh-29 lol
3 Likes
or thompson with drum on t1, AVS 36 on t1, SVT 38/40 on t1 etc.
3 Likes
Or maybe we get both “versions”.
In 12 hours, I watched several TV shows, enjoyed some traditional art content, ate, went to the bathroom, and played other games that kept people entertained. A BR tech tree is here.
so,there may be many issues with this table, especially in the classification of individual aircraft, class definitions and weighting factors.
Feel free to discuss them.
6 Likes
by your reasoning AR15, AK47 and M249 will PK be on the same BR as MG42, stg44 or Fyodorov’s Automat?
2 Likes
There, fixed it. Can I at least get a cookie?
Custom loadouts?
DF probalby:
1 Like
Maybe instead of creating BR trees, look for a solution how to reconcile historical correctness with the stillborn idea of normalizing and adapting the game to children who don’t pay for anything anyway…
let’s just go back to the roots and make the weapons more powerful for the guns and mechanics ONE SHOT ONE KILL. And only on the limbs the effect of injury.
All weapons should be equally effective, but so that it’s not too easy to increase the dispersion in the standing stance, hugely increase while moving, and deny the machine guns the ability to use the sight without resting the weapon on the ground, wall or sandbags.
This is a wargame with firearms, not airsoft guns.
6 Likes
-
Why did you put M1 Carbine in the same place as SVT 38 and Gewehr 41 ? It is inferior weapon.
-
GrB-39 has the same place as Panzerfaust 60, so Germans have nothing to fight T-34.
-
Jagdpanther should be the same or even higher level as Tiger II P.
-
Explosion pack or TNT should be available at the beginning (level 1- 2).
It is still a lot of grind (M1 Garand at level 9 from 14), but overall looks OK.
no. they would have their BR depending on their battlefield performance and not on year of design.
according to you this
should have BR 10 while this
should have BR 1.
3 Likes
Mentioning modern war, wouldn’t make it more sense to lock later BRs to cold war etc. because otherwise we would end up with like 15-20 levels.
1 Like
no point in getting later weapons cause we hardly have enough playerbase for ww2.
1 Like
BuT lOnGtErM-wise
I mean this whole thing should have long-term effects in terms of content iirc.
Ignore that guy. According to him - battle rating = year of production, even if it means that the Fedorov should be available at the beginning. It is waste of time to explaining anything to him.
there is no long term if playerbase doesnt increase. currently we have around 22k non unique players in peak hour, crossplay on on all 3 servers and that number goes low as 9k in off peak hours. that is ~11.5k unique players in peak and 5.5k in off peak. this is stat for weekend. on weekday we get ~17.5k in peak hour and as low as ~7k non unique players in off peak hours on all 3 crossplay on servers.
if they make cold war, they would only split playerbase and essentially kill game.
Im not saying they should do it rn but just preserve it for the future.
Ok so you just copy pasted WT down to same decoloured fonts.
Welcome to WT this month +/-1 B.R adjustment weekly and historical immersion byebye!
You have completely ruined the game. bye
5 Likes
Even if they retained the right to change the mechanics or appearance of the game. But we paid and backed the project for promises of historical accuracy.
So they will not deliver on the promise of the product we paid for?
Because the game is moving away from the assumptions that were in cbt.
2 Likes
for the nth time enlisted doesnt have nearly enough playerbase for ±1 BR . you will most probably get ±2 up to ±4 MM in peak hours and up to ±10 in off peak hours.
so please dont start shitting again with HA. you can choose either historically accurate PVE or actual PVP with human players.
Why not ? I play Armored Warfare which has maybe 200 regular players and about 1000 (?) total players.
For a match in the same BR I wait about 1 minute.