Agree with Quadro. I prefer balance over where the match is being played. I mean who really gaf about where the battle takes place? What kind of mentality is that? “I’m outraged that a tiger is in Moscow” I’m deleting my account…
Good riddance
1 Like
Will change automatically. Will it mean I’ll have to buy the same soldier, a different attire
For all possible campaigns?
At those ludicrous prices?
Thats really pushing it.
What about special squads such as the Tunisia Moroccan warriors? They might end up in Normandy or Pacific.
Thats Tom foolery right here.
I’m not asking for historical accuracy, but Christ, seriously removing all map choices for the sake of a mm that won’t even solve the main issues it’s claiming, seems the inverse as
Seems like the cost will far outweigh the benefits the more I think about it.
In short. Keep your half thought mm and let me choose the map, or at least war theater I wish to fight in. I don’t care if I must wait minutes (never had to before, so this issue seems imaginary.)
2 Likes
Did you made an account just to write this?
1 Like
You don’t have to always play with the “best” (end of war) gear, since as far as i know the exp rate won’t change based on your rating. So you can still use f.e. the current top moscow gear with moscow premiums and you would get mathced with players using similar rating gear. So early war premiums wouldn’t lose their purpose if you use them alongside similar rating gear.
That’s Quadro’s alt acc he is shilling his posts since he haven’t got enough attention he expected.
2 Likes
I lied, I decided to go find the quote and found it quick.
1 Like
Didn’t see this.
But I wouldn’t be surprised at all if that magical new feature…
… was a paid one.
Still won’t solve historical premium squads like Tobruk, Moroccan warriors, Volksturm thought.
3 Likes
They never mentioned the system won’t distinguish between the two types of Moscow map for potential uniforms. Just because they mentioned uniforms, doesn’t mean they mentioned what you want to do with said uniforms.
Forget it.
My point is that the proposed system is filled with as many holes and questions as the devs one, if not more.
It’s an alternative, but it’s not outright better.
I feel like there was clearly a misunderstanding somewhere early on in our discussion so now we’re just going around in circles for points that aren’t consequential enough to warrant it.
Edit: I see you didn’t be a big main either and wanted to continue the argument a little bit more. Surprise surprise, forum user is toxic and must defend his ego at all costs.
Edit 2: You can also stop liking your own posts to make yourself feel more justified too. Yes, it’s extremely obvious you’re liking your own posts, no one even has any time to read your post before it’s liked, there’s no way a genuine person is doing it as they couldn’t even know what you said by the time the like appears.
it is simply (more or less) like in the current state with possibility of choosing a campaign removed which results in a single one merged queue for everyone
erm you are not talking about queue. you are talking about current player distribution across campaigns/side/servers and how it fares against new player distribution. you know sometimes language specifics matter 
I think the tech tree changes are good but again, I have literally no clue why such a drastic matchmaking change should go through. There will still be changes to faction grinding from just a tech tree but I just wanna play the maps I wanna play. People have complained about this loads of times, recently people complained about too much tractor plant in Stalingrad. I can see how pooling maps would diversify the scenery but I would like to choose where I wanna fight! And if the only way play my favorite maps is through custom matches would gaining EXP from it be a option? Or would I have to just play roulette with the matchmaking. This just seems wrong to me and many others are expressing their doubts. all in all I hope it go’s well but I am very worried about these decisions and I hope with some hindsight both the community and development team find and fix problems with this proposal.
4 Likes
My system does not care whether your Moscow map is winter or autumn. You have access to winter uniforms because winter maps exist in the campaign. You have access to non-winter uniforms because non winter maps exist in the campaign.
My system would be the same. You can already go right now and play Moscow and buy a bunch of winter uniforms and get thrown into autumn maps. My system would be no different, the devs proposal is also no different (Unless they account for weather, which I don’t think they will. I think they just mean you won’t have Moscow winter uniforms in Berlin)
I do not care about accounting for weather in a campaign that has multiple seasons… Because no matter what you choose, it will look weird on some maps, and its not that big of a deal. There are no snowy winter maps in the Pacific, that’s why you should not have access to winter uniform.
The likelihood that the devs are going to account for map weather is very unlikely.
1 Like
But I have Moscow premiums with maxed out assualter squads, so won’t get matched with mid tier, it will look at my weapons and put me against high level players, which means I would be crazy to bring rocket tank, or Stug against IS2…
anyways, I could type all day, but I have to trust the devs know the feedback, know how much money they get in from us now, how much MM matters versus potentially upsetting existing paying customers.
Not like wood penetration in Moscow which has been implemented with much consultation. At very least Alpha test this change please! 
1 Like
@1942786
The new system aim to put same level of equipment in your team against same level of equipment in the enemy team. And on lots of aspect I imagine it very close to War Thunder.
I can imagine the system will be the same as War Thunder “Battle rating”
The Battle Rating of the squad will depend on the BattleRating of each plane/soldier.
Is there a possibility to have, just like in war thunder some saved preset with lower “BattleRating”?
ex: This one is a BR2.7 because it’s fun to play will low power plane/weapon too without changing everything manually. I can switch from the 5.7 to 2.7 with one click.
I can understand that it’s not planed for it may complicated the User Interface too much. Yet, It could be a nice addition for people like me who will probably get very sick of High tier like MP44 and Fedorov spam.
Maybe the BR could be shown in the squad selection too:
3 Likes
Yes maybe we misunderstand what we are trying to say to each other, Idk. And if I have came off as a dick at any point it was not my intention. I’m just trying to propose something that I personally think would be better than what the devs are proposing.
In theory (because we don’t know what exactly each weapon’s rating will be):
If you would use Moscow premiums with maxed Moscow assaulters (with Mkb 42) and Moscow tanks (Pz4 F2) you would get matched with players using similar rating gear, so (currently) top Moscow USSR gear (Fedorov, T-34 1941) or something similar from US. But if you would use Moscow premiums and assaulters with StG 44, yeah you would get matched against IS-2 or RD-44.
Tiger in Stalingrad? AS-44 in Stalingrad? Stalingrad is a symbol. This is a deliberate dishonouring of a symbol. Once Volgograd is renamed back to Stalingrad, it will be a force that cannot be countered. There was a deliberate mistake on the Kalashnikov memorial around 2017 - it showed a drawing of the German StG 44 rifle, not the AK-47. The sculptor who was in charge said, “There is no diversionary person in my collective who would deliberately plant the wrong drawing, nor did I do it. There could have been a mistake. We have not yet investigated whether it was made. If it has not, then glory be to God, if it has occurred, it is easy to correct.”
In translation, the sculptor said this: “There is no divisive person in my collective of workers. But I deliberately planned it in advance.”
Today, if you create a project that is globally disseminated, you are interfering with the events of the present and the future. You can say that you have created something for fun or for money (in the new world, modesty, creativity, loyalty…), but it is not. You, by what you are doing now, are helping either side build the world. The world will be new or this old one. But the old one will end and there will be nothing. There won’t be room for everyone in the new world. That’s all there is to it. There’s only one way to build a new world.
Stalingrad must not be dishonored, and especially not today. This would be dishonoring all the dead civilians, the fallen soldiers of the USSR and the dead soldiers of the 6th Army of the Wehrmacht!
Today’s Russia, and indeed the whole of Europe, is strange in that the soldiers of the Russian Liberation Army are made heroes and the soldiers of the USSR traitors. History is being bent and everything is being drilled into the heads of children at school. They don’t know that the T 34 is a Russian tank. But they know that the tank named after the animal fought in Stalingrad. “We saw it in the movies”. It won’t be long before the questions are asked: why did you have such losses in Stalingrad and Moscow when you had IS 1 and AS 44 tanks at the time? Were those soldiers so incompetent that they couldn’t fight with those weapons? After all, everything was so well balanced at that time. Machine guns against machine guns. Rifles against rifles. IS1 against Tiger… And you had such losses? And you were outnumbered! But my grandfather in the Immortal Regiment only had a rifle and a few rounds of ammunition at the time…Who cares about the truth…? Where to find the truth…
It’s the same as with the symbols of the German platoons. These symbols, in this day and age of war, have meaning. Enlisted has always prided itself on creating something no one has ever done before. But many people reject the rotation of maps for logical reasons. These players play, for example, Eastern Front, Moscow, Stalingrad, Berlin, whichever way they fancy. These players buy premium troops for real money for their favorite maps. And this in this day and age where people are increasingly bad with finances.
This message is not for 99.9% of people. But it is a message meant for those who are supposed to understand.
5 Likes
in first big topic about this change someone suggested this and keo said he will pass it to dev team. dont ask me for quote, but i think it is in first 100 or 200 posts if you want to check.
1 Like
But that would also split the playerbase
It just can’t be done
War thunder is a much older game with a community big enough to do something like that
1 Like
exactly this and…
I had over 2000 hours of hope and fun but from update to update it became unplayable.
You’re kidding people who have supported you with €
You nerf and buff weapons as you please.
an example:
Before the patch, it was possible to equip €50 premium tank squads with 2 primary weapons
So it made sense to get a second premium squad for €50 or even a third or fourth
So I invested a lot of time and material to give every tanker 2 max lvl weapons.
After the patch you can only give soldiers one weapon and I have now over 30 max Star5 weapons in reserve and don’t need them.
Your endless greed I hope you choke on it. I have invested a lot in you and I am very happy to do so.
But the fact that you didn’t consider it necessary to sell pistols, knives, mortars, flamethrowers, anti-tank rifles or much much more for orders was one of many reasons to show you my back.
The next key point
is the fact that while you allow premium LMG squads to add a pioneer, the SMG squads have not been included
and while we’re at it
My personal hate reason
You make it possible for one side to acquire 11-12 premium squads in a campaign. But you only allow 10 of them to be taken into battle.
Premium squads should have their own squad slots. and the prizes should include them for free.
6 Likes