Lend Lease B-25 for Soviets


B-25 Mitchell – Lend-Lease

Soviet Air Force

The USSR received 862 B-25s (B, C, D, G, and J types) from the United States under Lend-Lease during World War II[50] via the Alaska–Siberia ALSIB ferry route. A total of 870 B-25s were sent to the Soviets,[51] meaning that eight aircraft were lost during transportation.[citation needed ]

Other damaged B-25s arrived or crashed in the Far East of Russia, and one Doolittle Raid aircraft landed there short of fuel after attacking Japan. This lone airworthy Doolittle Raid aircraft to reach the Soviet Union was lost in a hangar fire in the early 1950s while undergoing routine maintenance. In general, the B-25 was operated as a ground-support and tactical day bomber (as similar Douglas A-20 Havocs were used). It saw action in fights from Stalingrad (with B/C/D models) to the German surrender during May 1945 (with G/J types).[citation needed ]

The B-25s that remained in Soviet Air Force service after the war were assigned the NATO reporting name “Bank”.[52]

Source North American B-25 Mitchell - Wikipedia

In late 1942 and into 1943, B-25 aircrews generally carried out strikes on German railway junctions, airfields, and other such rear areas, but in the second half of the war, the Mitchell crews bombed targets in cities such as Warsaw, Breslau, Konigberg, Tilsit, and Berlin. Towards the end of the war, however, due to the fact that B-25s required more room to take off and the advancing Soviet forces often had to make use of dilapidated and makeshift airfields, Il-4s were at times chosen for bombing missions over the Mitchells, despite the fact that their bomb loads were significantly lower than the American-made bombers. Nevertheless, the Soviets were able to modify some B-25s to convert them into transport aircraft. Mitchells were gutted out to carry as many as 20 people, and could haul up to one ton of supplies over a distance of 2,240 kilometers. Moreover, B-25s were used as reconnaissance aircraft, as they were capable of flying at night and were equipped with modern navigation and monitoring systems. On such flights, crews would place a 215 gallon fuel tank in the bomb bay, which would increase flight time by up to 7 hours.

B-25 were thus highly respected among Soviet bomber crews in the Great Patriotic War. One Soviet fighter pilot who test flew a Mitchell, Sergey Yakovlevich Tatushin, simply said, “It’s a beautiful aircraft.” Of the 861 B-25s delivered to the Soviet Union, 497 survived the war. In accordance with the terms of the lend-lease program, under the supervision of US officials, the majority of the Soviet Union’s American-made aircraft were destroyed, but not all. Indeed, the 330th regiment, stationed in Babruysk, continued flying B-25s until the introduction of the Tu-4 (a reverse engineered B-29) in 1949. The B-25 rightfully has its place in history as a major contributor to the Allied victory over the Axis powers in World War Two. Nevertheless, like so much about the Eastern Front, Soviet Mitchells were soon forgotten in the West. While Soviet air forces generally focused on providing close air support to the Red Army, the ADD did carry out long-range missions against rear targets, and the B-25s were undoubtedly the best aircraft they had for the job. The B-25 with Soviet marking truly was a beautiful aircraft (as were all Mitchells).

Source and more info “It was a beautiful aircraft”: The Soviet B-25s | vvs air war

I think i dont need to write much about the B25, it is allready used and known in the USA Tech Tree.

There are allready some lend lease Aircrafts for the soviets like P40 , A 20 Boston and Hurricane.

It could be a nice addition easy to Add , and i know its Copy and Paste.

The lighter Bomb load could fill the Br4 Soviet TT Aircraft gap.

  • Yes B-25 for Soviets with big Bomb load for BR5
  • Yes B-25 for Soviets with smaller Bomb load for Br4
  • No B-25 for Soviets
0 voters

Other Iders from me

Back to Topic

For what shoult it be?
Just if you did choose in the first poll on of the yes options.

I think it with event Without a squad it would be problematic then the Soviet bomber TT squads have a lower number of bomber crew, but to change it maybe just for one aircraft would be problematic i think.

  • For Tech Tree
  • For Event with Event squad.
0 voters

Stuff like!
Criticism, complaints, Ideas, questions, other, opinions,

Please down below ( in the comments) (replies) .

1 Like

Lend Lease can close a lot of holes, but here’s how it is, we already have Tu-2s, on the one hand, the Americans have 2 b-25s, one is angrier than the other)
Why don’t the other factions go too?
now the Japanese are lagging behind, they have a very weak g4m1 by 4 points, but still do not have total firepower by 5, I will not say that g4m1 is not level 5 br)

the Germans got a second aircraft with a 1000kg load, which is more successful in my opinion, but very difficult to implement

I would like to see the Soviet B-25 as 2 12×50kg bombs)

who is interested in reading :raised_hands:

For Japan High Br would be Ki 67 and Piy Ginga i would add.
Maybe a Ki 102 for Br 4 there was version of it with bombs.

The Soviets have a Br4 TT aircraft hole but it could be filled in other ways but i have links added about it in the post allready.

1 Like

the gap there is nominal, I could easily take the IL-2m type 3 or a-20 Boston, but since I have the IL-8, I take it, there is also a premium р-61, but just the fighters of the lower br are good up to 5 br
I also note that I have friends who fly Su-2s on 5 br, because carpet bombing is powerful)

I’m just disappointed that the Japanese were given the most flawed option possible.
Well , at least they thought to change 4 60 kg bombs :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

I think this would be more for lower BR A Japanese Bomber for BR2 or BR3 Kawasaki Ki-48 - Suggestions / Vehicles - Enlisted — official forum
Other idear for japan
Nakajima Ki-49 „Donryu“ for Japan - Suggestions / Vehicles - Enlisted — official forum

and you know, you’re right, give them 6 250 apiece from the Master’s shoulder and send them to 4 br, because unfortunately their aircraft base is terrible, this will be the k-1br argument, and in fact we don’t have to pull the top 5 br, it will be conditionally top br, but to make it look too bad send it to 4 br, anyone who wants to will take it to 5, as it was with the ju-188 at one time)

I think the IL 4 or the Yer 2 could be nice soviet BR4 aircrafts.

I think they with the weaker long range bomb loads would be perfect for br4

1 Like

most likely, I would like to see the IL-4, I like it the most, and the article that I threw off compares the b-25 and IL-4.,
The IL-4 is not bad, and as far as I’m concerned, it was an excellent aircraft with 4 250 kg bombs.

by the way, I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but the Soviet landing aircraft is actually a bomber)
which could take up to 1000kg of bombs)

Well, that is, in theory, it can be made a bomber 4 br)
There is already a model and there is no need to invent anything)

The Lisunov Li-2 Bomber ? , made even a post about it , in the link about the 2 Suboptilmal bombers .

I think this is most likely to weak for br4 , but for br3 i think its ok.

1 Like

We have a transport plane, an amphibious aircraft, and it can be a bomber. ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ