Thank you.
Yet amazingly, you choose to conflate the two together. I.E. what you basically said was “you can be a good player with good K/D but since you can also be a bad player with good K/D, I am going to assume you are the latter”.
A very dumb post - I haven’t shared any opinions on Normandy. In fact the only thing I said was I don’t know it cause I don’t play it. In fact the entire premise of your question was - how do you get a Jumbo in grayzone in Normandy without dying as infantry? It was so confusing. I don’t play Normandy, and I didn’t even know what Jumbo was referring to. Told you just as much. Was confused why you would have to be infantry to destroy it? Don’t you have those teammates around you to blow it up with a plane or AT gun? Anyways, that’s all I said and you come back with “your opinion is VOID and NULL”??? Lmao, ok. I didn’t know my statement that I don’t play Normandy and two questions were “an opinion”.
That’s actually complete nonsense. If you are in a tank and actively helping your squad, you don’t need to die because some artificial “commander” decided its not longer time to “TANK” anymore. What a bunch of nonsense?!? Why would you abandon your tank that supresses enemy team, assisting in objective and covers your team as it advances??? This is nonsense.
I dont’ know what you watched in your 1700 games and I don’t even know what “farming” is, but you apparently faced way too many random teams where people weren’t doing much against you, and I am glad you won all those games. If this is all you got out of those games, then congratulations! I am very happy that you are playing on good teams!!! I am not against that.
I make videos too. And please spare the me “teacher” drama. You’ve made assumptions and false statements a plenty.
You implied that I said K/D was “sole measuring stick” - that was a blatant lie.
You also implied that people with high K/D are automatically useless because they are obviously farming kills - that was also blatant lie.
You also just stated that I flaunted my stats - that is another blatant lie because I never said anything about my stats or posted them.
So next time you attempt to take a high moral ground please take some time to self reflect. Writing all this nonsense which is not true doesn’t make you sound smarter. It just undermines your statements because you generalize everything and often doing so in poor manner.
I am not going to bother to explain 5th grade level math to someone who doesn’t understand random probabilities for unranked, randomized games. If math is not your forte, I certainly do not wish to rekindle long lost passion for education. Anyone with high school level math knows this - random game of ten people vs ten people, where skill is even, will result in equal number of wins/losses over a period of 1000s of games. It’s a mathematical certainty. When balance is tipped - faction too strong, team is stacked or better equipped - then so does a result. But as long as we are talking about random games, it’s inevitable that the balance remains the same, around 50%. You win more? Congrats, you admitted to being on better teams, you admitted to having more than 1700 games so probably have top tier equipment. Congrats on your victories. That doesn’t change the fact that your team wins more not because you are some kind of monster of team games, but simply because the teams against you, are either less stacked, uncoordinated and full of random players of lesser skill level. Gloating over victories over teams whose composition was random, whose skill level might have been 1700 times lower than yours is just silly. Hence why I never once criticize enemy teams - neither in defeats nor in victories. I don’t know what they had to work with. Claiming that our victories are solely based on how WE play is silly. It gives no credit or accounts for any enemy shortcomings or weaknesses there from start.
Again this is nonsense. This is crazy coming from someone who appears to be able to think clearly - how can high K/D MIGHT make a good player POTENTIALLY, but DECISIVELY WITHOUT DOUBT makes him a bad teammate? How did you come to that definitive conclusion? What about his lethality, so unequivocally and decisevely made him right away a BAD TEAMMATE? You didn’t even use "might or potentially’ - just flat out “bad teammate”.
Btw, I don’t need to see your stats. I don’t want you to flaunt them or accuse me later of some other lunacy. You do what you want.
Top tier teams don’t attack in regular routes. They flank and they move off grid to avoid your mortars and your artillery fire because they assume the team against them will target those exact routes. And that precisely how they stumble into a rally point full of guys who all of the sudden do not feel safe, and since they have no experience killing enemies and staying alive, they will be dead and those rally points overwhelmed in seconds.
It seems to be a theme of yours to give examples where you think enemy is just a bunch of random guys, that can’t do anything. Ok, what happens when you play a top tier team? Want to show me a stat? Show me a stat where you won a game with your buddies where an enemy team LOST but had 8-10 players with badges. I’ve posted at least two. Have one? Post it. Cause I would like to see your results vs a team like that! I’ll wait!
No one questioned that. The only difference is my emphasis on learning to survive and kill first and then specializing. And also your belief that somehow doing that definitely makes you a bad team player, somehow.
Likewise. You don’t need to change my mind. In fact your gaming experience (1700) is almost equal to mine in terms of games, and whether it’s one campaign or four is irrelevant because we aren’t discussing campaign specific issues.
Thank you for sharing your opinion. Good luck in your games!.
Im impressed 
