Again, you implied that in my original post I stated that it was “the sole measuring stick”. I told you it wasn’t, and you clearly confirm that it wasn’t. As to being the most important - yes I still say the same thing. Your K/D ratio is the most important thing you must work on as a new player. As you progress in this you become an ACE, once you begin to be a useful member of the team with your specialization.
Have you watched Srg_Steiner play? You should watch him. He isn’t doing all these extremes of grayzone camping or one snipe and disappear sniper routine. He is always in the thickest of fighting, helping teammates, encouraging teamates and assisting. And he does so with incredible ability to stay alive and inflict insane losses. You seem to conflate a good K/D with some form of cheating or camping because according to you, it’s simply impossible to stay kill more enemies and die less if you are active member of your team. This is nonsense as you can be both.
It’s already been discredited. Implying that a tank positioning itself a safe distance from infantry and inflicting significant damage to infantry is somehow “camping” or
“grayzoning” and not helping YOUR team is your own assumptions.
You can’t learn that because if he plays in a game with a player like you who constantly wants him to build a ammo box, or run into an objective which is defended by a good squad and he doesn’t know how to shoot, how to lop a grenade or how to even order his squad about, he will be just that “warm body”, adhering to your sense of “team” and that’s it. He will die senselessly without even knowing who killed him and his squad. Hence why I disagree with your comment. Players need to learn to shoot and kill and effectively use their squads before they can do anything else. And if their first games are shared by gamers who constantly yell “GET TO THE OBJECTIVE YOU MORONS!!!” then it’s all ruined. Random players in this game and new players, aren’t concerned with your ideas of “TEAM” and “WINNING” because they haven’t even tried combat enough to know how this game works. Random games are made to be used as experiment with basics - shoot, kill, cover, relocate, lob a grenade, avoid a tank. Players can’t learn that if there is a self serving bully screaming GO TO THE LOCATION NOW>>> MARK COORDINATES NOW!!! BUILD SOMETHING YOU IDIOTS!!!".
Winning of the game in random matches is random! That’s why the rate of people playing in random game will always be 50%. It’s irrelevant stat because while learning the game you don’t need to focus on winning it. You need to learn to play first before you worry about winning. You have to evolve as an individual player before you can be a teammate.
I told countless times - I don’t play Normandy. I don’t know. But is it impossible to use a teammate with a plane to bomb those tanks? What’s the problem? Can no AT gun reach them?
This only happens if one sided battles where one team is way more experienced than others. If balance is the same - top team vs top team, random vs random - it won’t work. Your K/D will have to come into play because if someone is better and more efficient than you at killing squads, your rally points won’t matter. Nor will anything else you do.
It’s kind of ironic that you gave yourself 1400 games to play solo, experiment and do all that, just to get to the point where now you are doing things you think matter while you play “WITH FRIENDS”, yet you feel that simple instructions for newer player to learn to kill more and die less in their few couple of hundred games is somehow bad. There is a reason you got to where you are supposedly. And that high K/D rate you quoted was useful of course to make you develop as player.
But you want killers no? What good is all your rally points, your macine gun nests and your AT gun installations if players can’t stay alive to use them???
Lol, my friend, again, I am not interested in what “tactics” are vs a random team that doesn’t know what you are doing and frankly doesn’t even know what you are doing. My point is, when everything evens out, skill and lethanlity will matter the most.
I play enough games now to see guys, especially on Russian side, that will make your machine gun nests, AT guns and ammo depots and rally points absolutely useless. I saw a guy called “HUI HIBIKI” or something along those lines vaporize squad after squad with his 9 man squad. He was just all over the place. Running in and out, throwing grenades, laying frag mines. He was killing with such efficiency I actually thought that he was using some sort of aim assist, because it was just impossible the speed with which he moved in and out of rooms of the house and around it, and wiping out so many men. He destroyed our rally points and everything that was not nailed to the ground, ALL BY HIMSELF. And he was just 1 guy on his team.
The moral of this story is when game is not between two equally ranked teams, then pretty much anything a better team does will win the game. To think that simply building a rally point or ammo box is somehow decisive enough to win is silly. Don’t the other team build theirs? Why not if they are on the same level?
Actually, thats not true. Most players just learning how to play could not care less about winning. To them it’s all about progress, getting better. Hence why most of the time they don’t give to craps about some bully yelling “GET THE POINTS!!! GIVE ME COORDINATES NOW YOU DUMMIES”.
Well that sounds inspiring and all, but I do not believe you would last against some of the teams I’ve encountered. You are dreaming if you think you have enough time to “worry about the entire battlefield and someone can just be the eyes”. Of course, I cannot speak for everyone, but two of the teams I just posted about in screenshots, would have obliterated your team probably fast. Efficient killers, who understand objective play and have specialized squads of engineers, tanks and planes would obliterate any team unlike their own. Not knowing how to kill more than die, is the single greatest weakness that should be remedied early which is what my opinion is. A new player must learn to kill more than die. All else flows from here. Hence why I focused on K/D.
No insults taken. And likewise, I hope you aren’t offended either when I say that I am an integral member of my ‘team’ (if they can be call that because this game makes it harder to communicate with players) and my stats show it in every battle.
When I play, my role is clear. My job is to suppress enemy armor, and destroy enemy infantry. I know that if there is another at least half efficient guy on my team, his squad will have an easier time. I know that if there is an engineer on my squad he will be able to get to a better location to install an AT gun. I hope I have a good team around me everytime I start the game. And my job is to make their job easier. If I can blow up 12 tanks and kill 100 infantry in the process, while securing the objective and keeping them alive so that they could kill more men with their skills, then… well… that’s my purpose.
Thank you for your opinions. Enjoy the games! Hope to see you on the battlefield!


Im impressed 
