So you are addicted to shady and questiobable development practices and have a nearly sexual need to have byzantium featured everywhere?
No wonder you have such hot takes about development and history here.
There are two types of ppl:
- those who love Rome
- filthy barbarians
4 Likes
2 Likes
Imagine you download and play an MMO squad based shooter in World War II and actually don’t care about the era it portray.
Don’t know if this guy is trolling or not.
A lot of bad takes.
And yes, he’s indeed a new player, in my book.
Roughly 200 battles (!) played and yet lecturing people whose been investing their time, money and commitment on a whole other level to this game.
Akward.
1 Like
188 battle cute
innit bruv
2 Likes
Ok, that’s a good one, lol
I didn’t know playing a game makes you addicted
How so?
So, you’re just trolling…ok
This is not an MMO
Lecturing? No, just pointing out the bigoted arguments people make on here
Like I said, the devs offered a perfect compromise, and yet a bunch of idiots are still getting their panties in a wad.
Not my fault you want the game to be something it’s not
Just e.g.: I would’ve never even paid any attention to Enlisted, had I not seen screenshots of finally proper Eastern Front in a WW2 game with T-26s and BT-7s and Pz 38 Ts and early war charm.
2 Likes
Ok?
Not to mention, 68 hours is plenty of time to get a feeling for a game and understand it’s pros and cons.
Just because I’m not biased because I didn’t spend money on a clearly flawed game doesn’t mean I can’t point out the game’s flaws and/or people’s flawed opinions on changes to said game
LMAO what a joke, looks like you spent those 68 hrs dying 
So many of your opinions fall back on things being too difficult for you, blah, blah. We’ll see how the changes go but your rants are pointless, baseless, and ignorant
1 Like
Ah, yes, the classic gamer argument of “get gud”
Very convincing
Btw, I was shit when I first got the game.
Now I’m consistently getting 4-5k score per game, but yeah, go of
It will happen and the balance will be even worse than it ever was. High level gear WILL spill into low level matches when there won’t be enough players, the use of bots still need to be a thing and at least 50/50 bots and players should be a thing (still better than 1v1 and rest bots or worse 5v1 and bots.)
This “soft” needs to become tougher to never let this happen.
Not very often.
He’s saying it will always happen, which is false.
We already have high level gear fighting low level gear. This system will try to avoid that.
Then we end up with the same situation we have now with the playerbase being spread thin across too many queues
You cant possibly believe the matchmaker will be perfect without flaws
At least with now it’s for example T-34-85 vs Tiger II instead of T-60 vs Tiger II
The gap between T-60 and Tiger II is extremely bigger than any gap in a regular campaign
I thought it was to compromise balance, I would rather drive a T-60 and face bots then fight a Tiger II and STGs because the queue failed to put a high level person in a high level match because he waited too long.
No, it’s not perfect.
Will there be bugs? Most definitely.
That’s the nature of games
T-60 vs Tiger 2 won’t happen unless there’s like 50 people online at a time.
Fair enough.
But the queue will put that player into a match with a T-34-85 rather than a T-60.
Alright bud, stick with that “game is hard but I’m always top scorer” mentality 