We already have para units.
By adding what is effectivelly another assaulter squad.
Actually I would accept it.
1 Like
As a unit type instead of stormmtrooper. Not just in name and uniform. Evry other unit has paratrooper uniforms.
fairly evident.
If that missing W made you entirely miss the point, may god have mercy on your soul.
Majority dont come here to cry like you do, they just play the game.
Nope. I wrote quite the oposite.
Why not âtâ? It makes a lot of difference.
I see that you didnât notice your mistake.
Yeah, it is as you have absolutely 0 arguments to backup your claim other than âhistorical accuracyâ which also is fairly evident to everyone with IQ over 20 that your historical accuracy < Balance.
I simply cant agree with someone whos whining over guns just because they kill you. Thats why.
I agree with that.
But giving full auto weapons is not ballance so I donât see why it should be tolerated.
From where you have that info? Oh, I get it, you made it up, again, just like your mili sim argument.
If not then just quote the sentence where I wrote about me not being able to deal with troopers.
Maybe all we need is a tier system, so you can equip just boltactions and will never see a single FG 42 and those enjoying it can play it as much as they want.
I want to see FG42, but not on every goddamn soldier.
Even if you limit it to a certain soldier type it wonât stop those wanting to spam it you just nerf everything else.
So because I canât stop it I have to allow it? Thatâs not how it works.
I donât understand that part. How lmiting FG, M2 and AVS nerfs everything else?
You give even more versitility to stormtroopers, which are good in close quaters only right now, but the more verrsitile troops canât fight them anymore even long range. So you basicly force everyone to play stormtroopers to be effective in fights. You wouldenât catch me dead with a normal infantry man, if he canât figt stormtroopers at any range.
I wanted to give FG to gunners. We talked about it.
Why? Semi auto weapons are more or less the same as FG at mid-long ranges.
He can at mid-long ranges.
But I have to agree that assaulters are too meta right now. I can only imagine what will happen after Stg will be added.
Then the historical accuracy is out the window now? Why would mg gunners have a FG 42? It was intended as a mg, but only saw use with paratroopers. I would somewhat agree with limiting it to regular infantry men. They more or less can only fight, but get bodied by everything else pretty much. It would bring back a reason to put regular infantry men in your squad.
Because we donât have paratroopers and unless map desing will drastically change we wonât have them. So we have to work with what we have avalable.
Also FG42 vs BAR is quite good matchup in my opinion (thatâs why not assaulter).
They are similar in power right now. I agree on that, but the Breda Mod 30 is gone then? M2 gone? And what about Berlin? DP 27 is better then the FG 42 in my opinion.
Breda will stay as I have no idea why devs added it so I think / hope that there is a plan behing this madness.
My âvisionâ is: US has BARs and at some lvl M1919A6 as a âgerman style MGâ; Ge has MGs and at some lvl FG42 as âUS style MGâ.
M2 vs Stg vs AVS maybe? But I donât know those weapons good so itâs a bit guessing.
I have to agree that Berlin is quite problematic as russians donât have such weapon as FG.
I didnât use DP at all so I canât tell if it would be suited for such role.
If so I can agree and letâs just get the M2 out and donât add Stg for Normandy. At this point it was not fieldready yet. So it would acomadate for your wish for realism.
1 Like