Strange, seems like something we have right now.
Don’t under estimate RP players.
Also BA rifles are quite good in my opinion so unless you rush CQC like an idiot it’s ok soldier class.
Strange, seems like something we have right now.
Don’t under estimate RP players.
Also BA rifles are quite good in my opinion so unless you rush CQC like an idiot it’s ok soldier class.
Trooper being capable to fight back in CQC was something you want to be nerfed due to historical accuracy so its relatively clear the balance doesnt bother you at all.
And yet again for obvious reason the other weapons just functions beyond theyr historical cabapilities are completely fine. Proves once more that your points are rather biased than actually wanting historical accuracy even less balance.
Excessive amount of SMG’s, doesnt seem to bother you OR the said SMG’s working by far better than they should, historical accuracy in mind.
Being conserned about the Trooper having FG but dont mind assaulters running around with SMG + BA combo. Not at all biased.
Yeah they made the LW “Realistic” you can go there if you so much want the realism.
If you charge CQC with bolt action rifle you are an idiot. Don’t expect the game to help you.
Like…
That’s only slight inaccuracy due to gameplay. There is a difference between “more comon weapons” and “rare weapons for everybody”.
It was adressed by other forum members and I agreed with them so I don’t see your point.
I made a post critisising dual weapons, so again bad argument.
I see that you can’t read my friend. Let me quote the picture you had in front of your eyes.
“The weaponry, soldier’s uniform, appearance and capabilities of the vehicles […] are in line with historical facts”
So in other words:
Yet in other words:
It’s meant to be realistic in terms of weapons, look etc, not mechanics (with exception of vehicles).
Its has Realism-Elements
but True Realism or 100% Realism is Wasteful in a Videogame because it wouldn’t be important.
Immersive is enough.
So your idea of balance is limit the trooper capabilities to sit at edge of map, because u like to get ezmode kills against BA’s.
No wonder no one takes you seriously.
Trooper can use the MG42 or Stg44 for all I care, they were more common. If thats actually what bothers you.
Slight ? PPD amongst USSR troops was about common as FG on wehrmacht. Doesnt seem to bother you.
PPD / PPSH being technically full auto sniper rifles even theyr accuracy by even USSR was considered “adequate”.
Yet they aint. And if that Mil-sim was the direction devs are intending, the game would have been that from the start. So your argument of this game being “Mil-sim” is absolutely ridiculous.
And if you really are intrested of Mil-Sim realism, you wouldnt have spent so much time to whine over the historical accuracy of the game. You would have played actual mil-sims and not waste your time on this.
Or if thats the case, How you said it ? Retarded as rushing to cqc with bolt-action ?
So you are one of those players who want to change enlisted into another CoD? No thanks.
Go play CoD or BF.
+84k vs +7k
Yeah, sure.
It isn’t. I skipped the rest as the 2nd sentence was basically a lie.
No wonder no one takes you seriously.
I mean, 29 likes is quite a lot of positive feedback for this forum.
Guns like: FG42, M2 carbine, AVS 36 and any other that may come in the future shouldn’t be available to troopers, they should be limited to either assaulters or gunners. If every soldier is able to run with full-auto weapon, then we will end up with CoD-like gameplay. Also it renders assaulters useless and completely kills ww2 climate of the game as it’s not historical in any way. I can’t find anything positive in keeping those weapons as they are now, unless you want more brain dead run and g…
So you are one of those players who want to change enlisted into another CoD? No thanks.
Go play CoD or BF.
Nah im very happy with this new Cod / BF variant. You dont seem to be so perhaps you should try your mil-sims
+84k vs +7k
Yeah, sure.
Yeah, 0.2% of entire USSR army had PPD and 0.05% of germans had FG. So yeah, both can be considered nonexistent.
It isn’t. I skipped the rest as the 2nd sentence was basically a lie.
You complitelly ignored my argument, so why shouldn’t I do the same?
So you actually think that devs first make arcade game to atract people and suddenly turn it into a mil-sim game that no one plays?
That sir makes shit ton of sense.
I wonder how the LW is doing as it most likely was turned into such shitfest due to realism requests.
Bots everywhere last time I heard.
I mean, 29 likes is quite a lot of positive feedback for this forum.
Yeah, thats a significant amount of all players on the game. Not.
Yeah, 0.2% of entire USSR army had PPD and 0.05% of germans had FG. So yeah, both can be considered nonexistent.
So for you if something is 4 times as comon it’s almost the same? I wonder how your finances look with that approach.
So you actually think that devs first make arcade game to atract people and suddenly turn it into a mil-sim game that no one plays?
That sir makes shit ton of sense.
I wonder how the LW is doing as it most likely was turned into such shitfest due to realism requests.
Bots everywhere last time I heard.
You still don’t listen to my argument. Instead you made up your own and sitck to it like a madman. Is that because you run out of real arguments?
Let’s make a deal, next time you write about mili sim (that you made up), I’ll consider I won.
Yeah, thats a significant amount of all players on the game. Not.
So show me how big is support for your cause, smartypants. So far I can see you, one guy that left and maybe 2 other guys from other discusions. Overall max 10 (while being generous), it’s still almost 1/3 of mine.
I don’t answer to you anymore since you are stuck in your mindset and noone will change your mind. You are a lost cause.
noone will change your mind
Noone presented good enough arguments. And noone will as they don’t exist (unless I missed something).
See you are not intrssdted in a disscussion. You just want the version of the game you have in your head and will not compromise under any sircumstace so arguing with you is a waste of time. The likes by the way are in total so could be 28 likes from you alone.
See you are not intrssdted in a disscussion. You just want the version of the game you have in your head and will not compromise under any sircumstace so arguing with you is a waste of time.
I have been discussing this topic a lot, and you know what? My opponents in most cases start making up arguments or start personal attacks or stick to one argument that I debunked 3 times already.
I am interested in discussion but my opponents lack arguments or have mental breakdown in the process.
The likes by the way are in total so could be 28 likes from you alone.
Yeah, sure, I have no better way of spending my money than buying likes on the enlisted forum to convince 10 guys.
Also you can check profiles of those people and their history of posts. So no, they aren’t my subaccounts.
Oh no what happened? Double the amount of likes and the other half just on the comments arguing against your realim argument? How did that happen?
What do you mean?
Refresh the page. There are 48 likes now and 20 all those 20 likes on comments arguing against your it’s not realistic wining.
You mean this post?
And personal atacks start.
I deleted it already. Sry i can’t stand people just getting hung up in their own heads trying to make everyone else agree to their narrow minded way.
Well, I’m not suprised.
We have been arguing for quite a while now I don’t think that somebody has will to read it all.
I won’t count those likes as your cause support as many of those likes are from the same persons.
I will however count likes if you make a separate post about your cause as under it likes won’t repeat.
Still personal attack but at least you put effort into it, so you get points for that.