I don’t understand what the developers use to balance weapons. The most weird thing is that they weakened the damage of the M1 carbine family and VG1-5 in the previous update. I have never seen a post on the forum asking to weaken them. At the same time I didn’t think they were strong in the game, but they were still weakened. And equipment such as FG42 (I think it should be weakened), Soviet submachine guns (because the two sides of the Soviet-German campaign have their own strengths, I think they should not be weakened) such equipment can see many posts in the forum that they should be weakened, but so far there is no Seen weakened. Then the strangest thing is the FG42, which has escaped the previous weakening of semi-automatic rifles (increasing recoil) and machine guns (increasing the distribution of bullets fired when moving), making its already powerful attributes even more powerful.
if you notice that until 2 weeks ago they did not know that the fw was buggy, one wonders if they play the game at least
i hope its an event vehicle if not that means they will be adding tiger soon
I want Hotchkiss H38 as Panzerkampfwagen 38H 735(f) as German premium tank, after all they used them there. 
Hahahah the Mini-Maus.
I remember that well from WoT. Until they started bringing out TD’s at lower tiers and some other tanks, it was practically invulnerable. I lost more because I ran out of Ammo than because of battle damage back in the Beta - Release.
I advocated to remove the british weapons from Normandy since it is just lazy work to have them there with US squads. If they wanted British stuff there as well they should have put British squads as well. Personally i would prefer the later, AKA having the UK weapons with UK squads
I’ve said it 100 times before- it’s a morale issue.
The community’s confidence in their equipment matters more than their equipment.
The army representatives who ruined the M16 by adding a forward assist were right- belief that it works matters more than it working.
also, talking about pz4’s in normandy.
why the image of the batlepass variant doesnt even correspond to the tank we might buy? lol
Does it correspond with another tanks? I cant check now, maybe it is global thing that tanks have just “default” image?
oh yeah thank you.
its the default tank on that image, as far as my memory goes its the only one like this .
Pff… The DeLorean of DF fix this issue.
Well. According to them, their game isnt even broken.
Tiger 1 will be in Tunisia first. Mark it. Maps are made for it. Normandy? Heck no. Maps are way to small for it.
I’m betting Berlin, even if it’s ahistorical.
- It’s in the promo art
- T-34-85 can pen it
- Panzerfaust can pen it
British units on Normandy?! I will start to play the campaign if so! 
He looked the most logical in Normandy:
In Berlin there will be a Tiger 2, which is much better.
Tunisia has too weak tanks on average, they will never get him anywhere.
Normandy has both adequate grenade launchers and tanks that will be able to penetrate it
Personally, I hope to see it in Normandy, because I’m not interested in the KT there at all. Let this giant be in Berlin, and Normandy will see his little brother
“76 mm cannon” and that is how we kill panther, nice BUT i dont like the camouflage in this tank, it’s so bright in Normandy Campaign and seem like not real.
it’s also a 17 pounder with much better AT characteristics than the american 76
BIG POG
.
additional words for that damned spam filter
Tiger in Tunisia would also be a GIGANTIC carrot at the end of the grind to attract more Axis players in the campaign.